Scheduling 1 crossover game a year in football is completely different from scheduling a nationwide basetball league. Most football games are saturdays or fridays, bball can be any day of the week. There's a reason Boise and SDSU aren't asking the BE for an all sports membership, they're asking for the BE's help to get the BW for their olympic sports. The costs alone are prohibitive. And it'll hurt the BE's only bargaining chip when negotiating with TV broadcasters, the quality of the bball product. I would bet a case of beer no TV network is salivating over having UCF and SMU, let alone Nevada-Reno and San Diego state basketball as part of their inventory. It's bad enough UConn is not going to play Syracuse and Pitt. Now you want to relegate Nova and GTown to nonconference (i.e. meaningless) games (and their contributions to SOS, etc would be taken away)
If you are looking for a way to convince UConn fans that #BegHarder is the right decision, forcing UConn bball to play in a watered down, national conference that nobody wants to watch, that would be the way to do it.
As always I admire your passion Dan. And I will allow some slack on the potential for UH, UCF, maybe SMU to improve their bball programs. But a) that's going to take a few years b) those bball programs are way down the pecking order in their markets c) UConn is going to be going through a transition period when Calhoun retires, the worst possible time to be in a league that, even if all the improvements you cite hold up, would be light years behind what the BE was the past 3-4 years.