ACC considering reducing conference schedule to help boost the league's NCAA Tournament profile | The Boneyard

ACC considering reducing conference schedule to help boost the league's NCAA Tournament profile

Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
17,860
Reaction Score
102,750
Too funny. Now that the conference stinks. I laugh in their faces.

The ACC is strongly considering reducing its conference schedule so teams can schedule more marquee nonconference games and improve the league's chances of landing more at-large teams in the NCAA Tournament, CBS Sports has learned.


I guess they're listening to their coaches.

"We're not the ACC of old," Wake Forest coach Steve Forbes said of his team's few Quad 1 opportunities after Thursday's ACC Tournament loss to North Carolina. "We've had a lot of change-over with coaches. Once the league play starts, it's hard to move, especially in our league this year. If you look at my schedule, we played 20 league games, and 10 of those were either Quad 3 or Quad 4 games. You just don't have as many opportunities. So how do we fix that? Well, we have to be creative."
 
The problem is this only helps your resume if your crappy teams can win some games against other conferences. They’d be better off going the other direction and refusing to play any other conference so no one would know how terrible their crap conference is.
 
The problem is this only helps your resume if your crappy teams can win some games against other conferences. They’d be better off going the other direction and refusing to play any other conference so no one would know how terrible their crap conference is.

They should copy whatever the B1G's strategy is. Maybe play a lot of Midwestern mid-majors?
 
Gee.. maybe inviting teams willy nilly from 2000 miles away doesn't make so much sense????
You are forgetting how much Stanford and Cal adds to the prestige of the ACC as a football women's swimming conference. And depending on how the Tara replacement goes, it will solidify their position as the second best women's basketball conference ahead of the rising Big 12..
 
Yeah, scheduling more B10 teams will help. Go 2-21 against them next year instead. Keep it up BCU!
 
Not sure that would work since the ACC would like to win a national championship some time this century.

Not sure about that, the ACC chose money over championships when they went with BC/Syracuse/Pitt/Louisville/SMU/Cal/Stanford over UConn for expansion. The B1G has been very effective at winning tourney bids and credits without much performance.
 
Pretty soon they’re going to go the route of the WCC and give the #1 and #2 teams byes directly to the tournament semis. It’s already the Duke Invitational every year anyway.
 
I'd say the extra slots only help if the teams actually win those games, which none of them would have last year anyway....except for UNC...where losing every big game you play still grifts you into the tournament.
 
Eventually this whole thing goes to something similar to college hockey now.
Different conferences and levels for different sports. Football. Men/women’s hoops. Hockey. Baseball. Maybe Soccer. Then Olympic sports.
Establish appropriate nil rules for each and there you go.
 
Too funny. Now that the conference stinks. I laugh in their faces.

The ACC is strongly considering reducing its conference schedule so teams can schedule more marquee nonconference games and improve the league's chances of landing more at-large teams in the NCAA Tournament, CBS Sports has learned.


I guess they're listening to their coaches.

"We're not the ACC of old," Wake Forest coach Steve Forbes said of his team's few Quad 1 opportunities after Thursday's ACC Tournament loss to North Carolina. "We've had a lot of change-over with coaches. Once the league play starts, it's hard to move, especially in our league this year. If you look at my schedule, we played 20 league games, and 10 of those were either Quad 3 or Quad 4 games. You just don't have as many opportunities. So how do we fix that? Well, we have to be creative."

I remember when we were originally jilted by the ACC and they rubbed it in our faces. I thought this would be the start of a slow steady slide for the UConn Athletics, especially w/ K Ollie, Paul Pascolini+ the AAC Days of half-full stadiums on the road,

But fast forward to today where last Fall Syracuse called us their biggest Football game of the year - that was kind of their coach to say, even if it was only 1/4 true :) and we've been the top BB program 2 out of past 3 years. We pounded a depleted North Carolina in a bowl game which dominated a couple of news cylcles due to Belicheck's announcement. Another embarrassing loss for the ACC.

As we know they have top football schools dying to get out of the conference.

When you look at BC, Pittsburgh, Syracuse and other teams they took over us - look at how irrelevant they have become over the past 10 years. They simply don't move the needle on a national scale.


I think the new narrative and the most accurate one is....

The ACC made a huge error in not selecting UConn which led to THEIR slow and steady decline as basketball conference. BC never brought northeast market and fizzled out once they joined. It was a management error by ACC that should be studies somewhere. What was it that they missed and how did it happen?
 
You know your conference is in great shape when your plan to help its image is to play fewer games.

Books will be written about how the ACC took a winning hand and somehow managed to end up dead in a dumpster.
 
You are forgetting how much Stanford and Cal adds to the prestige of the ACC as a football women's swimming conference. And depending on how the Tara replacement goes, it will solidify their position as the second best women's basketball conference ahead of the rising Big 12..
Theres that!!
 

Online statistics

Members online
222
Guests online
2,422
Total visitors
2,644

Forum statistics

Threads
163,959
Messages
4,376,698
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom