dayooper
It's what I do. I drink and I know things.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2013
- Messages
- 1,667
- Reaction Score
- 4,371
NotreDameJoe, post: 915473, member: 4632"]I can't help you with your historical fiction but at least you should know how a contract works. Two parties exchange promises (I paint your house, you pay me $). IF they want to agree to be legally bound by the promises then they form a contract, usually written down and signed.
This is a simplistic view of things. There is much more to a media contract than I pay you to paint my house. Almost every case of media rights (many times in the recording industry) the publishing company does hold the rights, but still must pay what the original contract specifies. Conference by-laws mean nothing if the courts decide the are in breach of the GoR. There is precedence that they just may be.
The school holds the rights to her own home football games, mostly the right to broadcast them to a greater audience. If a conference of schools decides their rights are more valuable when pooled together then the individual schools contract to GRANT them to the conference. (and if they decide they'd rather hang onto their own rights, they just remain independent). Now the conference as a corporate entity owns the rights to any home games during the contract's duration.
Yet, you are missing the final piece of the puzzle: the conference has sold those rights to the media outlet (ESPN, Fox, NBC/Comcast, ext.). Since they are sold (or leased), ESPN can do whatever they want with them. The GoR isn't about keeping schools in conferences, it's about making sure the media gets to keep what they pay for. They don't want Kansas basketball out of their inventory. ESPN could care less if they are in the Big12, they just want to be able to broadcast them (and the advertisements that go along with them). In fact, some might say that ESPN might want them in the Big10. Imagine the match ups: Kansas vs Indiana, Kansas vs MSU, Kansas vs Michigan, ect. (and with UConn, if they were in the Big10). The only thing the conferences do is distribute the media payouts. That's the only card the conferences have. The Big12 can't deny ESPN what they paid for.
ESPN doesn't get a vote as to whether to pay the school or the conference or another network, they go by what the signed contract says. IF espn didn't pay the right people then they themselves wind up in court. Similarly if a camera crew tried to tape a football game without the rights to do so, they get sued by the rights holder. If you don't believe me, try walking into Gillette with your own camera crew next fall.
Just like if The Big12 denied payment to a school if they left the conference. If The Big12 didn't pay Kansas, they would be in breach of contract. ESPN/Fox/NBC will pay for what ever contract says, obviously. Since ESPN/Fox has their hands in The Big12 and The Big10 broadcasting, why can't they just broadcast those games on their outlets in the Midwest and Northeast? They bought them. The Big12 can't say "You can't show Kansas' games, we forbid it." Then The Big12 would be in breach of contract and could lose payment.
Since ESPN/Fox works with both conferences, how could The Big12 prevent them from filming the games? They can't. Since ESPN has rights to The Big12's tier 1 games, and when would Kansas be a tier 1 game, Fox already has the rights to the tier 2/3 games. They bought them. They can do whatever they want with them. If they want to put them on the BTN (which they own 51% of), what's stopping them?
The only real issue getting around a GoR is what's in it for the new conference. They are adding another mouth to feed without getting something back from the media, unless the new conference can get ESPN/Fox to pay more for something they already own (why there won't be An ACC Network anytime soon). The only way I see that if it was a huge move, like Texas (which isn't happening).