AAC - the tourney numbers four years in

Discussion in 'UConn Men's Basketball' started by BugsyCT, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:59 AM.

  1. CL82

    CL82 It's going to be ok - calm down and enjoy the ride

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    17,837
    Likes Received:
    23,715
    I guess sitting down and having a picnic on the train tracks is pleasant until the next train comes through. I'd rather run as fast as I can to try to get out-of-the-way though.
     
  2. ConnHuskBask

    ConnHuskBask Shut Em Down!

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    5,068
    Likes Received:
    5,845
    Agreed. Now, I think Cincinnati and SMU were both a bit underseeded, but by the same time, the biggest thing to blame is the teams themselves.

    Now, do I think this year in particular did Cincinnati get screwed having to play the best 3 seed at a 10pm EST tip? Yes. In general though, if the AAC wants better seeds, UConn, Memphis and Temple could maybe just not suck?

    For all the arguing and doomsday scenarios about this damn league, if UConn would just what it needs to do, we'd still be given favorable seeds.
     
  3. August_West

    August_West Free SD!!!!

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    16,030
    Likes Received:
    28,691

    I think the more accurate analogy is that "you have 10 years to live. do you want live out your days boning a 7 or a double bagger *" ?


    * double bagger = one bag on her head, one bag on yours in case hers breaks.
     
    CTBasketball likes this.
  4. freescooter

    freescooter

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    2,937
    Hey knock Cronin all you want but if we had Cincy's record plus the title in 2014 we would be considered a national power. Instead it took a miraculous shot to get us into our only other NCAA tourney.

    I do agree that Memphis and Temple have both disappointed bigly. I honestly thought this should be a 5-6 bid league most of the time and 4 in a bad year. But it looks to me like Houston Memphis and Tulsa are finally making an effort. Actually UCF too
     
  5. FfldCntyFan

    FfldCntyFan AD Dave is my hero!

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,763
    Likes Received:
    6,837
    As you also consider an Arby's heart attack on a plate to be a good deal your ability to identify good deals may be a bit suspect.
     
  6. Pudge

    Pudge

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    3,575
    This is the Charlie Bfystyk - cloud always over my head - perspective.

    Fact is ... every damn University (all 11) are seeking to be far better in Hoop (as they are in Football). How do I know? Look at who they are hiring and the dollars they are spending in Coaches and Capital Improvements. This is a league that is aiming to be better. You can say the results are mediocre; however ... I would argue. SMU and Cincinnati were very good teams this year; Houston is getting far better with Sampson. But, this BONEYARD crew? Yeah YOU. Every day you can read a post that the AAC is less than the A10. Or the CAA. Really? Have you been to Olean, NY? Do you really think the stickyness of longer term improvement will be at St. Josephs or Delaware or UMass?
     
  7. jibsey

    jibsey

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    2,380
    Have to have a strong and diverse enough team to succeed in this tourney. SMU plays 6 players. Players can go cold at any time and it's happened to a bunch of teams. Some of ACC's best teams with great RPI's and schedules are going down big time so what does that say? As a conference we have to qualify more teams but when the BE was strong with tons of bids it was UCONN that had to save the conference. All the hype and buildup of Duke all year long went up in smoke in the round of 32, showing that the propaganda machine can't be trusted.
     
  8. Pudge

    Pudge

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    3,575
    Can't argue with this ...

    A HIGH level UConn would pull this AAC from modest to something far greater. They/WE need to be far greater. Cincinnati, Houston, SMU - all - are on a upswing. Memphis (IMHO) and UCF are both better than the last few years. Dunphy will have good Temple teams. The AAC needs a solid lead horse and UConn has not been to our standard.
     
    freescooter likes this.
  9. freescooter

    freescooter

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    2,937
    People think about the old Big East in the 2000s but forget that it went through a period in the late 80s 90s when it was far from dominant. Really it was the addition of Louisville Cincinnati Marquette and the departure of BC and Miami (BC fell of the charts in the ACC, Miami was good only late in its tenure) that made the league so dominant and pushed the others to improve.
     
  10. kobe

    kobe

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    1,235
    First order of business is move the conference tournament from Hartford,
    CT. If the arena's gonna be empty let it be empty in New Orleans so I will actually go to one.
     
    CTBasketball likes this.
  11. Pudge

    Pudge

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    3,575
    Two can play that game ... I would rather stick chopsticks up my rectum than have skyline chili.

    WE could have done what the AAC Women's tourney did - and many UConn fans would have been happier - place the tourney at the Mohegan Sun Arena (45 minutes away) a you would have entertainment, bars, restaurants, hotels etc.

    Placement at Liacouras or at several home venues would be worse. Not by much - and we know that as well as Aresco.
     
  12. USNA90

    USNA90 New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2015
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    5
    More disturbing than the early tournament exit of SMU and Cincy is the fact that UConn played five games against those two teams this year, lost all of them, and was only in one of the games. Those two teams looked unbeatable, and I had almost convinced myself that SMU and Cincy were legitimately good. But I guess we have no right to complain about the perceived weakness of the conference when UConn is part of the problem, rather than the solution. It would be nice if one of these years UConn is actually in striking distance of being the regular season champion, instead of a middle of the pack team in a two-bid conference.
     
    freescooter likes this.
  13. 4in16

    4in16 uses the force

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,461
    Likes Received:
    1,530
    It wasn't supposed to be in Hartford again this season, it got moved so Orlando could host 1st and 2nd round NCAA games. It was a late change and Hartford stepped up.
     
  14. BFieldHusky

    BFieldHusky

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    845
    This was an extremely young and thin league. Lot of turnovers on teams, 3 new coaches. I actually think the league is going in the right direction. UCF hired a decent coach. I like Dunleavy short term at Tulane. I thought Tubby Smith hire at Memphis was decent. Cincy and SMU have been consistent in the regular season. Memphis, UCONN and Temple have been the big disappointments in league play.

    I think next year could be the best year yet for the league. Cincy should be a Top 20 team. SMU if Semi comes back could be Top 20. UCONN hopefully returns to the Top 25. UCF is a borderline tournament team. Watch Temple next year. And maybe Memphis can return to glory. Houston is opening a new building in two years which should help.

    The big key, and many have mentioned it, is scheduling OOC. SMU really did nothing out the league. That part they control. UCONN, Temple and Cincy to an extent schedule competitively out of league. Other teams need to do the same for this to work.
     
    jibsey likes this.
  15. freescooter

    freescooter

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    2,937
    I favored the Palestra myself. It is a historic site for basketball. Size is good for this league at 9000 and it is easily reachable from everywhere with a major hub airport and NE corridor rail. Major tv market. And it is a neutral site. Alas now it's the Ivy tourney home I think.
     
  16. kobe

    kobe

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    1,235
    The SEC requires that all OOC schedules get approval. You see it paid off this year with 10 teams in the top 100 RPI teams. Maybe Aresco needs to do the same.
     
    UConNation and Drew like this.
  17. jibsey

    jibsey

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,128
    Likes Received:
    2,380
    This has been discussed ad nauseum but isn't it time for every team in the AAC to try to schedule as strong an OOC as possible? I realize that it's hard to get the games but we need the competitiveness. It's hard to push this after losing to Wagner and Norteastern ( ours sced was pretty good) but it should come from the top of the league.
     
  18. BugsyCT

    BugsyCT

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    3,659
    Strong OOC and early season tourneys like Maui & Atlantis. (SMU is in Atlantis next year)
     
  19. CL82

    CL82 It's going to be ok - calm down and enjoy the ride

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    17,837
    Likes Received:
    23,715
    Lol, how is that even remotely an accurate analogy.:D

    (If we were on a different board I'd reference your LCW...)
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2017 at 2:22 PM
  20. Slasher

    Slasher

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2014
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    237
    The lower half of the league definitely has to schedule better. Temple, Cincy and UConn schedule fine every year. SMU, Memphis, Tulsa and Houston need to do better. UCF/ECU/USF/Tulane need to do way better.
     
  21. freescooter

    freescooter

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    2,937
    ECU USF Aand Tulane need to start winning games. It does no good to upgrade your out of conference schedule and get blown out every game. That is just another silly result of these RPI and RPI clones. They create distinctions that don't really exist. Does anyone really think the #220 team is better than the #250 or for that matter #149 is better than #153? Of course they are not. As a matter of fact once you get beyond the top maybe 10-15 the distinction are all highly suspect within teams within 20 places of each other. The distinction gets smaller and smaller the further you get down the list yet we treat is as if it were fact. Any system that prioritized strength of schedule over wins is just silly.
     
  22. Jerry1714

    Jerry1714

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,881
    Likes Received:
    3,783
    I would think people are smart enough to not base a teams season on 1 game, but I guess not. Was Nova not good this year? Or Lville?

    There is no shame in losing to UCLA either, and it does not mean Cincy was not good, they lost to a 3 seed who should have been a 2 seed in good game.
     
    tzznandrew likes this.