A Perverse View From CBS Sports | Page 2 | The Boneyard

A Perverse View From CBS Sports

Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,168
Reaction Score
3,170
UConn, UNC, and Kentucky were the only three top 10 teams to win in the last two days AND cover the spread. To call the win last night “mayhem” when covering the spread on the road with no Clingan and Karaban out for a decent stretch in second half with the bleeding is poor reporting.
It's assuming the dude even read a summary of the game nevermind watching it.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,233
Reaction Score
71,988
His final point ("I still believe if you put both resumes in front of the NCAA Tournament selection committee right now, they'd give Purdue the overall No. 1 seed") is 100% correct.

That doesn't mean that Purdue will stay #1 after getting walloped by a decent Nebraska team. But I don't think they fall farther than #2 if they do, and they'll have a number #1 votes as well.
Yes, that's the way he handles his poll, like the selection committee. Not everyone polls the same way, a lot of people poll like power rankings.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
4,354
Reaction Score
44,481
This is what Hurley means when he says we still do not get the respect that we’ve earned - not deserved - earned. How do programs like Purdue and Houston get more respect from the media as media darlings when they have accomplished absolutely nothing?
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
425
Reaction Score
1,858
Was the spread 4.5? We beat the spread. If they spent more than the 15 seconds they spent looking only at the final score, they would have known it was a 14 point pretty late in second half and not really as close as the score.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
8,787
Reaction Score
29,396
This is what Hurley means when he says we still do not get the respect that we’ve earned - not deserved - earned. How do programs like Purdue and Houston get more respect from the media as media darlings when they have accomplished absolutely nothing?
The media hasn’t even voted yet, and it’s not Monday afternoon. Let’s reserve judgement.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,439
Reaction Score
104,739
His final point ("I still believe if you put both resumes in front of the NCAA Tournament selection committee right now, they'd give Purdue the overall No. 1 seed") is 100% correct.

That doesn't mean that Purdue will stay #1 after getting walloped by a decent Nebraska team. But I don't think they fall farther than #2 if they do, and they'll have a number #1 votes as well.

Let's face it, the goal is first two rounds in Brooklyn and regional in Boston. Whatever number is next to UConn's name to achieve that, I'm fine with it.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,439
Reaction Score
104,739
Hows this for perverse?


So Sweet.

Syracuse last made the top 25 in December 2018 and has not yet been ranked under new head coach Adrian Autry. SU did not receive any votes in this week’s AP rankings, but is off to a strong 11-4 start this season.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
434
Reaction Score
2,225
Assessing the "chaos" this week among college basketball's Top Five, CBS Sports has this curiously dismissive comment as to how it reflects on UConn:

"UConn survived the mayhem with an 80-75 win at Xavier but not without trailing in the second half against the mediocre Musketeers.

...

Collectively, the run of results illustrates a lack of dominance among the supposed top teams in the sport and opens the door for recently downtrodden brands such as Duke, Kentucky and North Carolina to reclaim their place atop the college basketball hierarchy."


Curious logic, it strikes me. Rather than lauded as an exception to the "chaos", UConn is lumped with the losers, all part of a discredited Top Five. Oh, well, maybe if we beat Georgetown.
I think this is fine. He says we survived, we did. He said Xavier was mediocre, a sub 500 record would indicate the same. He said a run of results, if we lost 4 of 5 games that would be a run bad run of results. The top 5 lost 4 of 5 games I would call that a bad run of results. The Duke, UNC, Kentucky stuff is kind of silly but those teams generate clicks. This is a not a feature piece it's a daily style quick article compared to a lot of articles out there I actually thought on the whole this one was decent.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
434
Reaction Score
2,225
I think this is fine. He says we survived, we did. He said Xavier was mediocre, a sub 500 record would indicate the same. He said a run of results, if we lost 4 of 5 games that would be a run bad run of results. The top 5 lost 4 of 5 games I would call that a bad run of results. The Duke, UNC, Kentucky stuff is kind of silly but those teams generate clicks. This is a not a feature piece it's a daily style quick article compared to a lot of articles out there I actually thought on the whole this one was decent.
The same author just had us #1 in his power rankings, so maybe we can call off the dogs.
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
129
Reaction Score
744
Assessing the "chaos" this week among college basketball's Top Five, CBS Sports has this curiously dismissive comment as to how it reflects on UConn:

"UConn survived the mayhem with an 80-75 win at Xavier but not without trailing in the second half against the mediocre Musketeers.

...

Collectively, the run of results illustrates a lack of dominance among the supposed top teams in the sport and opens the door for recently downtrodden brands such as Duke, Kentucky and North Carolina to reclaim their place atop the college basketball hierarchy."


Curious logic, it strikes me. Rather than lauded as an exception to the "chaos", UConn is lumped with the losers, all part of a discredited Top Five. Oh, well, maybe if we beat Georgetown.
Did this guy watch us dismantle North Carolina?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,833
Reaction Score
26,349
This team has resilience. No panic. Last year we went in a tailspin with Sanogo and Clingan and came out fine. We're gonna go through some things and hopefully come out the other side with our freshman having big impact. I dont like the pressure of being a #1 seed. Don't want it.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,687
Reaction Score
8,862
If Duke was sitting at #4 in the country this week, there would be ZERO debate over whether they were #1 next week. And certainly no discussion over resume

Hope someone is sending this to Hurley. The disrespect of keeping a team #1 after losing is off the charts. Has it ever happened in the history of the poll??
Sending what to Hurley? The poll following the Purdue loss won't come out until Monday. I hope to god Hurley is worrying about more important things than what one writer or talking head predicts the next poll will say. I even wish you did.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,232
Reaction Score
43,339
Sending what to Hurley? The poll following the Purdue loss won't come out until Monday. I hope to god Hurley is worrying about more important things than what one writer or talking head predicts the next poll will say. I even wish you did.
A little irony here.
 

JakeTheDog

Makin’ bacon pancakes
Joined
Apr 19, 2014
Messages
677
Reaction Score
4,788
This team has resilience. No panic. Last year we went in a tailspin with Sanogo and Clingan and came out fine. We're gonna go through some things and hopefully come out the other side with our freshman having big impact. I dont like the pressure of being a #1 seed. Don't want it.

I agree with most of this but I can’t get on board with the last part. I want to see UConn ranked #1. How long has it been since we were the top ranked team in the country? 2009? Let’s beat Georgetown and see where the chips fall.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,232
Reaction Score
43,339
Collectively, the run of results illustrates a lack of dominance among the supposed top teams in the sport and opens the door for recently downtrodden brands such as Duke, Kentucky and North Carolina to reclaim their place atop the college basketball hierarchy."
Downtrodden definition: oppressed or treated badly by people in power.

We have had our way with Duke and Kentucky in the NCAAs in recent history and we beat UNC this year so I guess UConn fits the definition of power who are treating the blue bloods badly.
 

McLovin

Gangstas, what's up?
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
2,965
Reaction Score
18,878
This is what Hurley means when he says we still do not get the respect that we’ve earned - not deserved - earned. How do programs like Purdue and Houston get more respect from the media as media darlings when they have accomplished absolutely nothing?
I’d assume most of the media has an allegiance to some team (usually Duke or Syracuse) and they will pull for teams like Houston, Gonzaga and Purdue because they know they can’t win in March. Seeing UConn win makes a lot of them sick.

At least guys like Bilas has been able to put their bias aside to give UConn credit where it has been earned, but guys like him are the exception not the norm.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,215
Reaction Score
22,395
Parish rally does a good job explaining Purdue over us, and based on stats he’s right on. We can counter with some maybes and coulda, mighta, but they have better Q 1 and 2, 5 wins against top 20 NET, and beat us on most computer metrics.

I’ll take #2 in college hoops in the oh so critical CBSSports line poll right now knowing we’ve still got significant upside.

And I don't care about computer rankings

We're defending national Champs, they exit early

We're blessed if we're in their bracket
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,455
Reaction Score
37,104
Let's face it, the goal is first two rounds in Brooklyn and regional in Boston. Whatever number is next to UConn's name to achieve that, I'm fine with it.
We're going to have to be a #1 seed -- not necessarily #1 overall -- to get Boston. If we're behind Purdue for valid or BS reasons, it shouldn't affect such placement if we're both on the 1-line. A #2 seed in Boston would be a tall ask since the #1 seed would be at a disadvantage and the Committee isn't going to favor us that way. The only reason we got MSG in 2014 is because as a #7 seed, nobody expected us to even get there.

Anything #3 or higher is probably good enough for Brooklyn, and it would take a serious collapse for that to be at risk.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,283
Reaction Score
35,125
Yes, that's the way he handles his poll, like the selection committee. Not everyone polls the same way, a lot of people poll like power rankings.
I think it's totally legit. And I think it is healthy to have a variety of different voters apply different standards to what Top 25 means. They then all get tabulated together. As long as the voters are consistent in their thinking and logic.
 

gtcam

Diehard since '65
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
11,190
Reaction Score
29,653
Mainstream Media
Nuff said.......................................
 

Online statistics

Members online
704
Guests online
3,427
Total visitors
4,131

Forum statistics

Threads
159,768
Messages
4,204,240
Members
10,075
Latest member
Imthatguy88


.
Top Bottom