3/12 Metrics | Page 2 | The Boneyard

3/12 Metrics

Joined
Mar 26, 2024
Messages
603
Reaction Score
2,503
Rooting for Colorado to keep winning to make our loss to them less bad!
Hey now, they won!
Even if they get clobbered by Houston tomorrow, that should bump their metrics up....which in turn will help ours too.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
194
Reaction Score
1,350
If those are the teams bucking for the 7 seed, there are 4 teams better than us, unfortunately
I don’t see that. Not on a neutral court. We haven’t lost a game in March in 2 years. Seed us wherever.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
7,243
Reaction Score
25,313
UConn:
NET: 30; KenPom: 34; BPI: 17
22:9; 14-6 in the BE; Road/Neutral: 8-7
Quad 1: 5-5; Quad 2: 7-3; Quad 3: 4-1 Quad 4: 6-0

Missouri
NET: 20; KenPom: 20; BPI: 30
21-10; 10-8 in SEC: Road/Neutral: 3-8
Quad 1: 6-10; Quad 2: 3-0; Quad 3: 4-0; Quad 4: 8-0

BYU:
NET: 26; KenPom 24; BPI: 24
23-8; 14-6 in B12; Road/Neutral 8-6
Quad 1: 6-6; Quad 2: 7-2; Quad 3: 4-0; Quad 4: 6-0

Marquette:
NET: 25; KenPom: 26; BPI: 19
22-9; 13-7 in the BE; Road/Neutral: 8-6
Quad 1: 5-8; Quad 2: 7-1; Quad 3: 5-0; Quad 4: 5-0

Kansas:
NET: 18; KenPom: 21; BPI: 12
20-11; 11-9 in B12; Road/Neutal: 6-8
Quad 1: 6-10; Quad 2: 6-1; Quad 3: 5-0; Quad 4: 3-0

Memphis:
NET: 49: KenPom: 48; BPI: 42
26-5; 16-2 in American; Road/Neutral: 12-3
Quad 1: 6-1; Quad 2: 5-1; Quad 3: 9-3; Quad 4: 6-0

Miss St.
NET: 34; KenPom: 32; BPI: 37
20-11; 8-10 in SEC; Road/Neutral: 10-6
Quad 1: 7-9; Quad 2: 5-2; Quad 3: 2-0; Quad 4: 6-0

Gonzaga:
NET: 8; KenPom: 9; BPI: 9
25-8; 14-4 in WCC; Road/Neutral: 12-6
Quad 1: 4-6; Quad 2: 6-2; Quad 3: 5-0; Quad 4: 10-0

Creighton:
NET: 38; KenPom: 36; BPI: 25
22-9; 15-5 in BE; Road/Neutral: 7-6
Quad 1: 5-6; Quad 2: 6-3; Quad 3: 6-0; Quad 4: 5-0

New Mexico:
NET: 41; KenPom: 41; BPI: 47
24-6; 17-3 in MW: Road/Neutral: 9-5
Quad 1: 3-3; Quad 2: 8-1; Quad 3: 3-2; Quad 4: 10-0

Georgia:
NET: 31; KenPom: 33; BPI: 38
20-11; 8-10 in SEC: Road/Neutral: 5-8
Quad 1: 4-10; Quad 2: 5-1; Quad 3: 3-0; Quad 4: 8-0

West Virginia:
NET: 47; KenPom: 51; BPI: 48
19-12; 10-10 in B12: Road/Neutral: 6-8
Quad 1: 6-10; Quad 2: 4-2; Quad 3: 4-0; Quad 4: 5-0
Colorado just beat WVU. Doubly good for us.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,493
Reaction Score
6,266
Colorado over WVU and Texas smoking Vandy both great for the resume. Seton Hall is the one you wish you could have back. Regardless, 6/7 seed is in UConn’s control to seize
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
5
Reaction Score
63
Quad 1A (NET top 15 home, top 25 neutral, top 40 away)

UConn: 3-1
St John's: 2-1
Marquette: 2-4
Creighton: 1-4
Xavier: 1-3
Nova, Georgetown, Butler, Prov, DePaul, Seton Hall: 0-28
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
816
Reaction Score
4,133
This was the Big EAst in 2011. It did so well OOC early in the season that a team that finished NINTH in the regular season could win the tourney and end up as a 4 seed in the NCAAs. But that was us, so no one complained.

The only way to rate conferences is based on OOC play. Because it was months before the NCAAs it's not nearly as good a predictive tool as if teams had their OOC games spread out throughout the year, but it's still all computers have to go on.
Any SEC team playing today winning the conference tournament would likely be more impressive than the UConn's 2011 BET run.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
3,483
Reaction Score
13,049
New BM out and we moved one spot back to the 3rd 8 seed, just behind the zags.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,423
Reaction Score
23,667
I’ll be honest. I don’t get the St. Mary’s hype. Consistently projected a 5 seed. Best win is Gonzaga twice and Nebraska? Good team but 5 seed good? I’ll take the 12/5 underdog.

And they're not alone. We're better than and would be favored over at least half the teams rated above us
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2013
Messages
1,104
Reaction Score
4,306
And they're not alone. We're better than and would be favored over at least half the teams rated above us
Based on what? We're Kenpom #34 and haven't beaten a single team that's projecting better than a 7 seed. We wouldn't be favored over more than 2-3 teams that are currently ahead of us.
 

Online statistics

Members online
395
Guests online
4,841
Total visitors
5,236

Forum statistics

Threads
161,970
Messages
4,285,363
Members
10,118
Latest member
jacobbethel


.
..
Top Bottom