It’ll probably be
10 B1G
10 SEC
3 ACC
3 B12
1 G5
1 at large
Based on preseason poll
SEC7: 1 Tex, 5 Ga, 8 Ala, 9 LSU, 13 SC, 15 Fla, 18 Okla
B1G7: 2 PnSt, 3 OhSt, 7 Ore, 12 Ill, 14 Mich, 20 Ind, (nr) USC
ACC5: 4 Clem, 10 Mia, 16 SMU, (nr) Lou, (nr) GaTech
B125: 11 ASU, 17 KSU, 22 ISU, 23 TTU, (nr) BYU
G5 2: 25 Boi, (nr) Tulane
ATL2: 6 ND, 19 TAMU
Not in: 21 Miss, 24 Tenn
If the proposal of 7-7-5-5 for the P4 comes to fruition then I think that actually “saves” the ACC and B12. Let’s be honest, the 5th best in those conferences are mediocre.If you eliminate conference championships at what point does it make sense to eliminate conferences? The ACC already took a step in that direction with unequal revenue distribution. At some point do we just go to a "every man for himself" model? The logic is pretty much the same. "We want to reward teams who invest in college football"