It’ll probably be
10 B1G
10 SEC
3 ACC
3 B12
1 G5
1 at large
Based on preseason poll
SEC7: 1 Tex, 5 Ga, 8 Ala, 9 LSU, 13 SC, 15 Fla, 18 Okla
B1G7: 2 PnSt, 3 OhSt, 7 Ore, 12 Ill, 14 Mich, 20 Ind, (nr) USC
ACC5: 4 Clem, 10 Mia, 16 SMU, (nr) Lou, (nr) GaTech
B125: 11 ASU, 17 KSU, 22 ISU, 23 TTU, (nr) BYU
G5 2: 25 Boi, (nr) Tulane
ATL2: 6 ND, 19 TAMU
Not in: 21 Miss, 24 Tenn
If the proposal of 7-7-5-5 for the P4 comes to fruition then I think that actually “saves” the ACC and B12. Let’s be honest, the 5th best in those conferences are mediocre.If you eliminate conference championships at what point does it make sense to eliminate conferences? The ACC already took a step in that direction with unequal revenue distribution. At some point do we just go to a "every man for himself" model? The logic is pretty much the same. "We want to reward teams who invest in college football"
The SEC and B1G loudly complained about the seedings last year bring determined by winning your conference not merit.It's super dumb, but this is what we get when the only motivating factor to doing anything is money. JMO but the sweet spot is 8 teams. Trying to justify that there are potentially 24-28 teams that can win a flipping football playoff is hilarious. The format below at least gives everyone a chance to compete for a title, while satisfying TV by having a few more of the blue blood types getting in.
2 B1G
2 SEC
1 ACC
1 Big 12
1 G5
1 Independent or P4 Entrant determined by ranking position.