25-26 Rotation | Page 2 | The Boneyard

25-26 Rotation

I am hoping Allie comes back in tip top shape and forces her way into the rotation! I think she can be a scoring machine if she can just get some extended, consistent minutes. Of course, this likely is contingent on her being able to play effective defense at the same time, thus my hope for her to focus on fitness over the summer!
 
I don't agree with this characterization. Geno's substitution patterns were nothing radically different from other seasons where he's had 8+ serviceable players in the regular rotation.

I'm not sure why some fans try to project their own personal fascinations onto Geno. It's the other coaches who should be fascinated with what Geno's accomplished and how he's accomplished it. Geno's seen a thing or two and is not so easily fascinated.
Clearly, we see things differently. In past years, UConn’s starters would play the entire 1st qtr. During the 2nd qtr, Geno might bring in a sub or 2. Absent foul trouble Geno would typically be back with his starters by the end of the 2nd qtr. The starters would begin the 3rd qtr and assuming UConn was pulling away, then and only then, UConn would sub liberally, usually through mop up time.

Prior to this past season, when was the last time UConn had 8+ serviceable players in the regular rotation?
 
I agree with Cuango regarding Allie. Like to see her move into the rotation. Her shooting is first rate and we will need her come tournament time. But, she must up her defense game.
 
I agree with Cuango regarding Allie. Like to see her move into the rotation. Her shooting is first rate and we will need her come tournament time. But, she must up her defense game.
I think that’s a realistic expectation. If you consider that UConn basically used a 5-guard rotation this past season and 2 of those guards are gone, then the 2 logical replacements for Paige & Kaitlyn are Kayleigh & Allie.

On the other hand, I expect Kellis to compete for PT, and UConn’s tremendous depth at wing will likely spillover to some of the guards PT. All that goes out the window if, for instance, UConn’s starting lineup ends up with Jana, Serah, Sarah, Azzi & KK, or Blanca is the real deal and works her way into the starting lineup.

As I have suggested, UConn should sell tickets to practice because that’s where the fiercest competition will take place this coming season.
 
Last edited:
Clearly, we see things differently. In past years, UConn’s starters would play the entire 1st qtr. During the 2nd qtr, Geno might bring in a sub or 2. Absent foul trouble Geno would typically be back with his starters by the end of the 2nd qtr. The starters would begin the 3rd qtr and assuming UConn was pulling away, then and only then, UConn would sub liberally, usually through mop up time.

Prior to this past season, when was the last time UConn had 8+ serviceable players in the regular rotation?
He didn't have the depth he had last year in a decade and he has more this year. The ability to throw different players with different skill sets into a game upon demand is a great luxury. I just remember clearly Geno putting KK in against SC and Kitts having to defend her. Talk about a blow by. That's the great power of a very good and deep bench. This year the options are what the kids call "sick".
 
He didn't have the depth he had last year in a decade and he has more this year. The ability to throw different players with different skill sets into a game upon demand is a great luxury. I just remember clearly Geno putting KK in against SC and Kitts having to defend her. Talk about a blow by. That's the great power of a very good and deep bench. This year the options are what the kids call "sick".
Agreed. The last time you can make the case that Geno had an 8+ player rotation was the 2015-16 season: Stewie, Mo, Tuck, Kia, Lou, Gabby, Pheesa, Saniyah and Nat, and the last 2 on that list are borderline. Once UConn got to the Big Dance, the rotation was trimmed to 7, and it went to 6 after Lou was injured in the national semifinal.
 
Has Geno ever had 15 players before? I’m trying to think of a season when he used up all the scholarships and coming up empty.
He did have 15 players a number of years ago, but I’m not sure all were on scholarship or healthy. At least right now, Geno looks like he will have 15 healthy scholarship players, knock on wood.
 
Between 2021-24, the team was injury cursed. This past season, mostly healthy and a lot of players got PT. If Geno can convince the players and future recruits that the ends justify the means, where championships and development but not PT is the focus, that's the ideal situation. It's not an easy balance, however those kids do exist.
 
Sometimes I wonder if what I have seen and heard from Geno over the past 20 years actually resonates with many on this forum who seem to not listen. Geno is absolutely committed to find the right combinations of players who contribute on defense, affect the game in more than just scoring and work in a half court offense which is paramount to NCAAT success. At the moment he has 6 core players we know will see the bulk of the time-Azzi, Sarah, Ash, KK, Jana, Serah. We know that Heckel will be the backup point guard to make 7. After that, Geno will see who earns time and can evolve the team in defense, offense and effect the games. He may tinker at times, but he will not be playing 12 people come critical games or NCAAT, regardless of what this forum feel his talent is. He does NOT do that. Go to the History Archive and look back on many of the stacked rosters and you will see this pattern. After the core 7, my guess is Blanca (given her pro experience), Morgan (given how Geno played her in multiple situations), Caroline (hopefully gaining back the skills and confidence before the injuries took their toll) will be given longer looks. Ice is sort of a known commodity and has significant competition for her spots this year. Ayanna is in even a much more tenuous position, depth ahead of her, injuries causing 2 years of missed games and practices, limited offensive game skills and a propensity to foul. Again, those are just the facts that she has to overcome. Can she? Of course, but time is not on her side. Allie, for everyone that loves her 3-point shooting, needs to accelerate the development of the other areas of her game to warrant any rotation consideration-she's not especially quick, not a great ball handler, hasn't really shown the defensive skills Morgan has an hasn't not shown a mid-range or driving ability that Ash has shown. I have not seen the full arsenal of her game to know if she can really contribute-she had to be ranked #7 in her class for a reason other than 3 pt shooting so I am hoping is shines through. Kelis and Gandy are freshman with significant talent in front of them that they will have to shine in practice and in the moments they do get.

The Big East is going to 20 games this year so the opportunity to "tinker" will be available. What 10 players will make of the bulk of the playing time will be interesting to watch. But as @Charliebball noted, injuries do happen and this team has so much depth, regardless of who gets hurt, we have quality options-I am immediately knocking on wood to not jinx anyone.

Geno has 12 titles, 2 Olympic Gold Medals, 2 FIBA World titles and he absolutely does not concern himself with how other teams are coached or how they deploy their personnel for him to emulate. He will tailor our schemes to best match up vs. those teams but he is not going to change what has worked for him for 40 years due to perceived talent on the team or how other teams utilize their rosters. He will stick with 8-10 core group on a regular basis with 7 being the aforementioned.

Respectfully submitted.
 
They will develop their skills in practice and over the summer and in the fall. You don't get better in basketball by playing actual games you get better in practice and by practicing. I have a different take on this. I think realistically Kelis and Gandy will see the least time and the remaining players will be brought along as warranted based upon their condition just like Geno did with Aubrey and Caroline. The team is almost exactly who you would select if you wanted to full court press all game. The defensive unknown is Blanca but she is big at 6'2" and fast from what I have seen of her. K9 and KK are both excellent point pressers with KK being pure chaos at times. Then there is Azzi, an underrated defender who may be the best in her position in the country and then Ash, Sarah, and the rest. You can also go "big" with Sarah, Serah and Jana or Ice in anyone of those spots. Ice is a natural 4 though and difficult to defend there. The list goes on and on. I think he plays everyone that can help the team and that is everyone. Sure he winnows down come the post season but he has a lot of combinations to try out. Who are natural fits together? He will find out.
"...and stay happy."
 
Between 2021-24, the team was injury cursed. This past season, mostly healthy and a lot of players got PT. If Geno can convince the players and future recruits that the ends justify the means, where championships and development but not PT is the focus, that's the ideal situation. It's not an easy balance, however those kids do exist.
Sorry, but that is not accurate. Yanna missed the whole season, Azzi wasn’t really ready until December, Aubrey didn’t play until February and then only sparingly, Carol played mop up minutes in the Big East tournament and Morgan had a season-ending injury in February. Only nine of the 14 players were available for the whole season; that is not mostly.
 
Sometimes I wonder if what I have seen and heard from Geno over the past 20 years actually resonates with many on this forum who seem to not listen. Geno is absolutely committed to find the right combinations of players who contribute on defense, affect the game in more than just scoring and work in a half court offense which is paramount to NCAAT success. At the moment he has 6 core players we know will see the bulk of the time-Azzi, Sarah, Ash, KK, Jana, Serah. We know that Heckel will be the backup point guard to make 7. After that, Geno will see who earns time and can evolve the team in defense, offense and effect the games. He may tinker at times, but he will not be playing 12 people come critical games or NCAAT, regardless of what this forum feel his talent is. He does NOT do that. Go to the History Archive and look back on many of the stacked rosters and you will see this pattern. After the core 7, my guess is Blanca (given her pro experience), Morgan (given how Geno played her in multiple situations), Caroline (hopefully gaining back the skills and confidence before the injuries took their toll) will be given longer looks. Ice is sort of a known commodity and has significant competition for her spots this year. Ayanna is in even a much more tenuous position, depth ahead of her, injuries causing 2 years of missed games and practices, limited offensive game skills and a propensity to foul. Again, those are just the facts that she has to overcome. Can she? Of course, but time is not on her side. Allie, for everyone that loves her 3-point shooting, needs to accelerate the development of the other areas of her game to warrant any rotation consideration-she's not especially quick, not a great ball handler, hasn't really shown the defensive skills Morgan has an hasn't not shown a mid-range or driving ability that Ash has shown. I have not seen the full arsenal of her game to know if she can really contribute-she had to be ranked #7 in her class for a reason other than 3 pt shooting so I am hoping is shines through. Kelis and Gandy are freshman with significant talent in front of them that they will have to shine in practice and in the moments they do get.

The Big East is going to 20 games this year so the opportunity to "tinker" will be available. What 10 players will make of the bulk of the playing time will be interesting to watch. But as @Charliebball noted, injuries do happen and this team has so much depth, regardless of who gets hurt, we have quality options-I am immediately knocking on wood to not jinx anyone.

Geno has 12 titles, 2 Olympic Gold Medals, 2 FIBA World titles and he absolutely does not concern himself with how other teams are coached or how they deploy their personnel for him to emulate. He will tailor our schemes to best match up vs. those teams but he is not going to change what has worked for him for 40 years due to perceived talent on the team or how other teams utilize their rosters. He will stick with 8-10 core group on a regular basis with 7 being the aforementioned.

Respectfully submitted.
I think if Geno had 12 players that were as talented or contributed as much as his top 6 players he would figure out how to play 12. Did Geno narrow his NCAAT teams and top 5 games to a magic number due to a pattern or preselected number? I think not. At a certain point, you have to have a chemistry and familiarity for the players on the floor and that can control your numbers but when players contribute a special attribute you need or want, they usually play. Before the games were effectively over in the FF, Geno was playing 9 players. You had KK with speed and defense, Ash with speed and surprising offensive rebounding and her known shooting, Ice to back up Jana and play underneath and Aubrey for defense, disruption, and her floor game. So take a core of KK, Azzi, Sarah, Ash, and Serah next year. Add the certainty of K9, Jana and Ice playing and you have 8. No Caroline, Blanca, Morgan, in the mix?

Clearly we don't know about Morgan's recovery, Blanca's defense or Caroline's full resumption of her earlier skills. Just suppose Morgan gets back and even improves. I think she plays. Geno loved her defense and floor game. She is 6'2" and so is Caroline and so is Blanca. These are big guards/swing players. If Caroline gets it back, she, as a senior, will play. Her offensive game is multifaceted. She can score in bunches and has a nose for the basket. Blanca is a slasher and power finisher. A different skill and one that breaks down a defense. All 3 may merit time and regularity because all 3 can add different elements that complement those of the core and in some cases even introduce new ones.

One thing that Geno demonstrated last year that above and beyond the titles and records makes him the best ever and that is that he can coach any kind of team and talent and transform them into title contenders. Small ball was brilliant in its conception and use. It was a weaponized game changer he brought out at the right times. I see the same thing for other combinations that can play together next year. I think Geno is a very fluid thinker. Whatever flows on this team, he will not turn off the juice. He will nurture it and grow it and make into in February/March a pretty potent concoction.
 
I think if Geno had 12 players that were as talented or contributed as much as his top 6 players he would figure out how to play 12. Did Geno narrow his NCAAT teams and top 5 games to a magic number due to a pattern or preselected number? I think not. At a certain point, you have to have a chemistry and familiarity for the players on the floor and that can control your numbers but when players contribute a special attribute you need or want, they usually play. Before the games were effectively over in the FF, Geno was playing 9 players. You had KK with speed and defense, Ash with speed and surprising offensive rebounding and her known shooting, Ice to back up Jana and play underneath and Aubrey for defense, disruption, and her floor game. So take a core of KK, Azzi, Sarah, Ash, and Serah next year. Add the certainty of K9, Jana and Ice playing and you have 8. No Caroline, Blanca, Morgan, in the mix?

Clearly we don't know about Morgan's recovery, Blanca's defense or Caroline's full resumption of her earlier skills. Just suppose Morgan gets back and even improves. I think she plays. Geno loved her defense and floor game. She is 6'2" and so is Caroline and so is Blanca. These are big guards/swing players. If Caroline gets it back, she, as a senior, will play. Her offensive game is multifaceted. She can score in bunches and has a nose for the basket. Blanca is a slasher and power finisher. A different skill and one that breaks down a defense. All 3 may merit time and regularity because all 3 can add different elements that complement those of the core and in some cases even introduce new ones.

One thing that Geno demonstrated last year that above and beyond the titles and records makes him the best ever and that is that he can coach any kind of team and talent and transform them into title contenders. Small ball was brilliant in its conception and use. It was a weaponized game changer he brought out at the right times. I see the same thing for other combinations that can play together next year. I think Geno is a very fluid thinker. Whatever flows on this team, he will not turn off the juice. He will nurture it and grow it and make into in February/March a pretty potent concoction.
I agree 100% with your post. I’ll add one thing (underlined below) that I haven’t read anyone else mention.

Geno’s newish-oldish MO harkening back to the early TASSK years and resurfacing last year with the Paige-Sarah-Azzi Superteam would illuminate how Geno has fully embraced large rosters with top-down quality players.

Superteams are now a feature of the paradigm shift of the portal and NIL. And this has emboldened Geno’s use of large-rosters — yes, he has had large rosters in the past, but he did not (or could not) stack all the scholarships with quality players.

Geno and CD has built a program that has one of the most alluring “Field of Dreams” siren call to recruits and transfers. In the Superteam era, Geno has now been able stack a full roster with the top-down quality of recruits.

And since Geno and CD do not compromise on the type of recruits they entertain, the program has performed at the wholesome peak level as before without the rocky experiences of other programs in this new landscape.

But is Geno’s newish-oldish approach sustainable? How do you keep 15 quality players happy? In this post, I circumscribe some of the considerations for the 2025-2026 team.

In practice, Geno and CD has deployed a full 40-minute mix-match strategy fed by his best-in-class farm system which is only limited by how many players reach team peak postseason “basketball player” form. Last year, even though the team started with only Paige as the certain commodity, the team had a late season (5)+5 (a Noah’s Ark) rotation, prior to Morgan’s injury, with 9 starters or former starters.

With a second-five/six line of Kayleigh, Ash, Morgan/Caroline, Ice and Jana, I do not know why Geno would constraint himself to a (5)+2 or (5)+3 if this second 5/6 (not forgetting Allie or Ayanna) perform with a full year tutelage from Geno, and team’s metamorphosis starting earlier than the Big East schedule.

Quality mix-match depth is now a great strength, why squander it?

No UConn roster is the same. What is the same is the type of recruits that Geno and CD desire and fortunately are able to attract. So, next year’s team’s 40-minute mix-match play will look a little bit different but would be no less potent.
 
Last year, even though the team started with only Paige as the certain commodity, the team had a late season (5)+5 (a Noah’s Ark) rotation, prior to Morgan’s injury, with 9 starters or former starters.

With a second-five/six line of Kayleigh, Ash, Morgan/Caroline, Ice and Jana, I do not know why Geno would constraint himself to a (5)+2 or (5)+3 if this second 5/6 (not forgetting Allie or Ayanna) perform with a full year tutelage from Geno
This is the question for me: is a 5+5 rotation in March really practical? Morgan fell out of the rotation in February due to injury, and Aubrey’s lingering injury status inhibited kept her from fully entering the late season rotation. This left Geno with a 5+3 rotation bonded in tremendous chemistry in the run-up to the tournament. Was this result merely an accident of those two injuries, or was a contraction to 5+3 inevitable for practical reasons?

@Huskee11 went to an open practice in March and observed that the top 7 or 8 players got the majority of the attention, and wondered if expanding the number of players getting full attention might require limiting or dispensing with the use of male practice players. Perhaps this merely reflects who was healthy at that moment. But it may also suggest a possible limitation to practice time.

The one thing I’m confident of is that Geno devises his team based on the players he has, not according to a rigid system. Last season he had 8 fully healthy and developed players and figured out a path to get that group to an NC. Next season he may have a lot more fully healthy and developed players. My only question is whether he can take a 10 player (or more) rotation into March. Would he stop using male practice players to get all 10 sufficient attention in those late season practices?

Building championship chemistry is a tricky business, and I’m only guessing at how one goes about it. I imagine we all are — unless Dawn or Kim posts under a pen name here. Geno’s small lineup surprised me last season, and I’m sure I’m not alone in this. I am ready to be surprised again this coming season. Changing game plans and lineups is one thing, devising a sustainable practice schedule for those lineups is another.

What little I know of coaching comes from soccer, and some of the same issues arise there. Getting position players familiar enough with each other to pass crisply and at the right moment to avoid offsides calls is one point of similarity. Trusting each other to get to the right spot on defense is another. This takes time in practice, lots of it, and if injuries force late season substitutes, mistakes are inevitable and chemistry suffers as the level of mutual familiarity declines. One main difference between a good coach and a great one is devising a sustainable practice schedule and getting enough players to buy into its demands. I was not a great coach.

I don’t know if my experience maps neatly onto the sort of practical limitations Geno might face in his practice scheduling. But I suspect it might. Are these limitations enough to make a deeper rotation undesirable? I don’t know, but it’s a recurring thought. We all dream of the 5+5 (or more) rotation, me included. I’d love nothing more than to see Geno’s players run opposing teams off the floor night after night in March. I’m sure we’ll see exactly this in the BE schedule. But can he really get them to be able to do it all the way to an NC? I sure hope so.
 
Last edited:
its difficult to avoid the conclusion of at least two deep at every position:
1-KK,K9
2-Azzi, AS
3-Blanca, MC, Caroline
4-SS, Ayanna, Ice
5-Serah Williams, Janna
Injuries, like Caroline, will inevitably reduce the available number to nine or ten (or less).
But I think there will be an unusually expansive rotation--a nice problem.
 
I agree 100% with your post. I’ll add one thing (underlined below) that I haven’t read anyone else mention.

Geno’s newish-oldish MO harkening back to the early TASSK years and resurfacing last year with the Paige-Sarah-Azzi Superteam would illuminate how Geno has fully embraced large rosters with top-down quality players.

Superteams are now a feature of the paradigm shift of the portal and NIL. And this has emboldened Geno’s use of large-rosters — yes, he has had large rosters in the past, but he did not (or could not) stack all the scholarships with quality players.

Geno and CD has built a program that has one of the most alluring “Field of Dreams” siren call to recruits and transfers. In the Superteam era, Geno has now been able stack a full roster with the top-down quality of recruits.

And since Geno and CD do not compromise on the type of recruits they entertain, the program has performed at the wholesome peak level as before without the rocky experiences of other programs in this new landscape.

But is Geno’s newish-oldish approach sustainable? How do you keep 15 quality players happy? In this post, I circumscribe some of the considerations for the 2025-2026 team.

In practice, Geno and CD has deployed a full 40-minute mix-match strategy fed by his best-in-class farm system which is only limited by how many players reach team peak postseason “basketball player” form. Last year, even though the team started with only Paige as the certain commodity, the team had a late season (5)+5 (a Noah’s Ark) rotation, prior to Morgan’s injury, with 9 starters or former starters.

With a second-five/six line of Kayleigh, Ash, Morgan/Caroline, Ice and Jana, I do not know why Geno would constraint himself to a (5)+2 or (5)+3 if this second 5/6 (not forgetting Allie or Ayanna) perform with a full year tutelage from Geno, and team’s metamorphosis starting earlier than the Big East schedule.

Quality mix-match depth is now a great strength, why squander it?

No UConn roster is the same. What is the same is the type of recruits that Geno and CD desire and fortunately are able to attract. So, next year’s team’s 40-minute mix-match play will look a little bit different but would be no less potent.
All good by me except that The Metamorphosis comes in February/March. It will happen again the same time this year . Geno has to get through all of oldude's 3003 combinations before he will ratchet down the defense, ratchet up the offense and they get the eye of the tiger. They will win a lot of games, and probably big ones, on talent and depth alone but Geno will be looking for those "magic" combos like last year's insane small ball. We are going to be a great pressing team as one option. Don't be surprised to see K9,KK, Ash, Azzi and Sarah out there in full court chaos at the same time. Don't also be surprised to see Serah, Sarah and either Jana or Ice out there at the same time also for a giant underneath team or Blanca and Caroline as the 2 wings, Sarah or Serah underneath, Azzi at the point and Ash at the off guard just for fun inter alia. This could be a Big Blue(or White) Machine out there.
 
This is the question for me: is a 5+5 rotation in March really practical? Morgan fell out of the rotation in February due to injury, and Aubrey’s lingering injury status inhibited kept her from fully entering the late season rotation. This left Geno with a 5+3 rotation bonded in tremendous chemistry in the run-up to the tournament. Was this result merely an accident of those two injuries, or was a contraction to 5+3 inevitable for practical reasons?

@Huskee11 went to an open practice in March and observed that the top 7 or 8 players got the majority of the attention, and wondered if expanding the number of players getting full attention might require limiting or dispensing with the use of male practice players. Perhaps this merely reflects who was healthy at that moment. But it may also suggest a possible limitation to practice time.

The one thing I’m confident of is that Geno devises his team based on the players he has, not according to a rigid system. Last season he had 8 fully healthy and developed players and figured out a path to get that group to an NC. Next season he may have a lot more fully healthy and developed players. My only question is whether he can take a 10 player (or more) rotation into March. Would he stop using male practice players to get all 10 sufficient attention in those late season practices?

Building championship chemistry is a tricky business, and I’m only guessing at how one goes about it. I imagine we all are — unless Dawn or Kim posts under a pen name here. Geno’s small lineup surprised me last season, and I’m sure I’m not alone in this. I am ready to be surprised again this coming season. Changing game plans and lineups is one thing, devising a sustainable practice schedule for those lineups is another.

What little I know of coaching comes from soccer, and some of the same issues arise there. Getting position players familiar enough with each other to pass crisply and at the right moment to avoid offsides calls is one point of similarity. Trusting each other to get to the right spot on defense is another. This takes time in practice, lots of it, and if injuries force late season substitutes, mistakes are inevitable and chemistry suffers as the level of mutual familiarity declines. One main difference between a good coach and a great one is devising a sustainable practice schedule and getting enough players to buy into its demands. I was not a great coach.

I don’t know if my experience maps neatly onto the sort of practical limitations Geno might face in his practice scheduling. But I suspect it might. Are these limitations enough to make a deeper rotation undesirable? I don’t know, but it’s a recurring thought. We all dream of the 5+5 (or more) rotation, me included. I’d love nothing more than to see Geno’s players run opposing teams off the floor night after night in March. I’m sure we’ll see exactly this in the BE schedule. But can he really get them to be able to do it all the way to an NC? I sure hope so.
For what follows, it is helpful (at least to me) to think:
  • (a) this year is hopefully the last runoff year of the effects of the biblical injury plague;
  • (b) there is a final-four/elite eight level rotation which affects around 15% of UConn’s schedule;
  • (c) outside of (b), it is a larger rotation during competitive minutes of games which UConn is expected to win; I think we may have plausibly a (5)+6 rotation in this category.
The injury runoff affected (c) rotation players this year: Ice, Jana, Aubrey, Azzi which is a big part of the reason why UConn’s team peak postseason form didn’t emerge until after the TN game.
  • the injury plague has directly affected Ice and Jana’s development and in the case of Ice, her offense at the (4), since she has had to play out of position for her collegiate career thus far.
Next year, Providence-willing, is a normal year in Geno’s newish-oldish MO, where because he has more rigorous practices with a healthy full roster, he is expected to have developed a super-majority of his roster for his rotation;
  • a full roster implies an evenly distributed 4-4-4-3 (or some combination) yearly classes, where each class is a core nucleus in their senior year at the latest;
  • a yearly (5)+2 / (5)+3 rotation for most games implies that a large portion of even the senior or junior classes are not rotation-worthy which is long-term untenable with having a full roster;
  • having a larger rotation in most games — larger than Geno and CD utilized in prior seasons when he didn’t have top-down quality in a full roster — in a 40-minute fast-pace mix-match play is just a natural (necessary and sufficient) consequence of having a sustainable full quality roster.
I also would consider a player part of a rotation if she appears in the competitive minutes of games. And not whether she has played a minimum of x minutes over a season.
 
Allie, Ayanna, Kelis and Gandy are not going to average 10 minutes a game. Add Caroline and Morgan if they are still a health concern.
 
This is the question for me: is a 5+5 rotation in March really practical? Morgan fell out of the rotation in February due to injury, and Aubrey’s lingering injury status inhibited kept her from fully entering the late season rotation. This left Geno with a 5+3 rotation bonded in tremendous chemistry in the run-up to the tournament. Was this result merely an accident of those two injuries, or was a contraction to 5+3 inevitable for practical reasons?

@Huskee11 went to an open practice in March and observed that the top 7 or 8 players got the majority of the attention, and wondered if expanding the number of players getting full attention might require limiting or dispensing with the use of male practice players. Perhaps this merely reflects who was healthy at that moment. But it may also suggest a possible limitation to practice time.

The one thing I’m confident of is that Geno devises his team based on the players he has, not according to a rigid system. Last season he had 8 fully healthy and developed players and figured out a path to get that group to an NC. Next season he may have a lot more fully healthy and developed players. My only question is whether he can take a 10 player (or more) rotation into March. Would he stop using male practice players to get all 10 sufficient attention in those late season practices?

Building championship chemistry is a tricky business, and I’m only guessing at how one goes about it. I imagine we all are — unless Dawn or Kim posts under a pen name here. Geno’s small lineup surprised me last season, and I’m sure I’m not alone in this. I am ready to be surprised again this coming season. Changing game plans and lineups is one thing, devising a sustainable practice schedule for those lineups is another.

What little I know of coaching comes from soccer, and some of the same issues arise there. Getting position players familiar enough with each other to pass crisply and at the right moment to avoid offsides calls is one point of similarity. Trusting each other to get to the right spot on defense is another. This takes time in practice, lots of it, and if injuries force late season substitutes, mistakes are inevitable and chemistry suffers as the level of mutual familiarity declines. One main difference between a good coach and a great one is devising a sustainable practice schedule and getting enough players to buy into its demands. I was not a great coach.

I don’t know if my experience maps neatly onto the sort of practical limitations Geno might face in his practice scheduling. But I suspect it might. Are these limitations enough to make a deeper rotation undesirable? I don’t know, but it’s a recurring thought. We all dream of the 5+5 (or more) rotation, me included. I’d love nothing more than to see Geno’s players run opposing teams off the floor night after night in March. I’m sure we’ll see exactly this in the BE schedule. But can he really get them to be able to do it all the way to an NC? I sure hope so.
One main difference between a good coach and a great one is devising a sustainable practice schedule and getting enough players to buy into its demands. Yes, all of the above is true and more difficult than BB as you have to work with 10 field players. Success, as I was fortunate to have in U12-U23 select was the exceptional player(s). This was years back and many of my conscripts went on to play for US National team as it was at the time. UConn and Geno are back on top due to Paige and Sarah last year and most hopefully, Azzi, Sarah and Serah this year. I applaud the success of women's BB as I mourn the demise of men's soccer.
 
I also would consider a player part of a rotation if she appears in the competitive minutes of games. And not whether she has played a minimum of x minutes over a season.
Thanks for your thoughtful response, @NycUcWbbFan and especially that final remark about what counts as "rotation." I am not wedded to any particular number of minutes, and I agree that playing in "competitive minutes" is what matters. However.......

regularity also matters.

A player who gets competitive minutes once in a while is usually someone responding to a sudden need, but tends not to be who Geno wants on the floor in crunch time. When I see stats like that, I rewatch those games, and this is almost always what you find. As an example, Inês Bettencourt played 9 mins against Princeton three seasons ago in a very close win. This was more than her typical role, and she played a crucial part in avoiding an upset. But this hardly made her a rotation player. By the same token, Aubrey got some key minutes toward the end of the season. But she was not on the floor regularly enough for us to call her a rotation player this season, even though she has been one in previous seasons.

This is why I raised the question concerning the practicability of a deeper rotation. I don't have an answer, and I am moved by your observation that having 15 very talented players almost demands a deeper rotation. The only other consideration I can think of is that prior to the portal era, players tended to move through the program in predictable ways, and if they didn't start as freshmen -- as very few did -- they cold soldier on in the confidence that they would eventually be in the rotation, perhaps as sophomores or juniors. Kyla Irwin is perhaps a good example of this. She stuck with the team even though her minutes were limited in the first two seasons, but gradually became a regular who averaged almost 17 minutes in her final season. Sadly, in the portal era, it's harder to see how that sort of loyalty can be sustained without some extraordinary effort by the coaches and teammates.
 
Between 2021-24, the team was injury cursed. This past season, mostly healthy and a lot of players got PT. If Geno can convince the players and future recruits that the ends justify the means, where championships and development but not PT is the focus, that's the ideal situation. It's not an easy balance, however those kids do exist.
Sorry, but that is not accurate. Yanna missed the whole season, Azzi wasn’t really ready until December, Aubrey didn’t play until February and then only sparingly, Carol played mop up minutes in the Big East tournament and Morgan had a season-ending injury in February. Only nine of the 14 players were available for the whole season; that is not mostly.
Accurate, or the lack thereof, would be if I specifically stated a certain number or percentage of players that were healthy. "Mostly" was used as a comparison to the prior seasons. There were 14 players on the roster. One could argue that there were no expectations for Yanna, Carol, or Aubrey to play, so that leaves 11. Azzi missed the first four games of the season (3 being blowouts), then 4 in Dec due to the sprain, playing in 34 games. Morgan played in 24 of the 40 games. For Geno to have 9-11 players available was an improvement from 6-9 (give or take).

My point was that over the span of the entire season, there were 10-11 players available, in comparison to the 3 prior years.
 
Geno will as he always does, will provide minutes to whoever he feels best meets the needs of the team as the match ups dictate. Certainly, a big plus but few have commented on the great benefits such a deep team give him in practice. Many pluses that will show up in both game performance and player development.
 

Online statistics

Members online
31
Guests online
1,420
Total visitors
1,451

Forum statistics

Threads
163,960
Messages
4,376,758
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom