bballnut90
LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 7,951
- Reaction Score
- 36,932
The actual quote from her interview on ESPN, per this Sports Illustrated article. On one hand it can sound like the Fever are better without Clark. On the other it can sound like the team can survive while she gets healthy as they don't have to be dependent on Clark.
People are going to take it the way they want to.
![]()
ESPN Analyst Claims Fever Are 'More Dangerous' Without Caitlin Clark
The Indiana Fever blew the Las Vegas Aces out on July 3, beating them by a score of 81-54 at the Gainbridge Fieldhouse Arena. This marks the second consecutivewww.si.com
""I think that Indiana is even more dangerous when Caitlin Clark doesn't play," Peck said during a July 3 episode of SportsCenter, per an X post from Ken Swift. "Because she's a ball-dominant guard. The ball is in her hands a lot, so you know what you need to try to take away. But when you look at Indiana now, they've got so many weapons.
"When you have a point guard like Kelsey Mitchell, and Aari McDonald making plays on the perimeter, and a post like Aliyah Boston, I'm gonna tell you: Indiana, they are a threat. And it's specifically on the defensive end," Peck added."
Peck's follow up where she basically doubles down. FWIW, she's always had pretty blatant SEC bias in her announcing. If she wants to give credit to the Indiana players, then give credit without undermining Clark. As an announcer she should know that she doesn't have to go out of her way to diminish CC to give her teammates some shine.
Side note: I don't think anyone who follows the Fever under value what Boston and Mitchell bring to the table. They get a lot of love from fans, and McDonald is deservedly getting a lot of attention and props for her play with Clark out. Here's a great article where the author shows you can build up someone without throwing shade elsewhere.