Charliebball
**
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2016
- Messages
- 13,371
- Reaction Score
- 50,355
yup........Does anyone else on the BY want Kneepkens? Reminds me of LLS a little.
yup........Does anyone else on the BY want Kneepkens? Reminds me of LLS a little.
I think she will certainly improve on the offensive end......she simply needs to stop rushing the ball transfer and keep the ball held high because she's been too turnover prone.....How do we know that Jana won’t develop into a decent offensive player? This was only her 1st year of playing against competition in the US. I thought she showed some skills that could be developed further.
This is Chloe's sister correct?
Is she good enough to play with Chloe at SC? With Sakima in the portal, I believe SC has three spots open.Yep. The Kitt that learned probably best to redshirt out the freshman year.
I’m not familiar with her game to say.Is she good enough to play with Chloe at SC? With Sakima in the portal, I believe SC has three spots open.
I'm guessing with her Do Not Contact that she will be joining her sister and platooning with her.Is she good enough to play with Chloe at SC? With Sakima in the portal, I believe SC has three spots open.
Hard not to like Kitts. Works hard and leaves it all on the court. She's kind of how I imagine Ashlynn Shade (whom I adore) would be if she were a few inches taller.I'm guessing with her Do Not Contact that she will be joining her sister and platooning with her.
For some reason, I would have enjoyed seeing Chloe in a UConn uniform...oh well.
Assuming ND makes the tournament. They have little left right now.
Audi Crooks would like a word - 23.4 ppg. A few others come to mind: Reagen Beers and Sedona Prince, for example. I'm not really sure what "consistently" means, but they averaged 17.3 and 17.2 ppg, respectively. All are 6'4" or taller. If by "true Big" you mean someone who never tries or attempts to shoot treys, well, they're an endangered species precisely because when you can have a Stewie, Candace Parker, or A'ja Wilson who can do it all inside AND threaten from beyond the arc, "true Big" is simply a liability.Other than Betts, name me one other true Big in the country who can consistently score? As for Bigs getting in foul trouble, they all do, including Betts.
I think Milford means the other Lou - as in Lopez Senechel. Which is a more recent "comp" for a shooting wing than Katie Lou.KLS?
Agree with your suggestions. I guess my point would be there are very few bigs in the country who are consistent scorers. You may be able to count them on one hand.Audi Crooks would like a word - 23.4 ppg. A few others come to mind: Reagen Beers and Sedona Prince, for example. I'm not really sure what "consistently" means, but they averaged 17.3 and 17.2 ppg, respectively. All are 6'4" or taller. If by "true Big" you mean someone who never tries or attempts to shoot treys, well, they're an endangered species precisely because when you can have a Stewwie, Candace Parker, or A'ja Wilson who can do it all inside AND threaten from beyond the arc, "true Big" is simply a liability.
Agreed. I honestly think it says as much about the runway for "true Bigs" in today's game. There's basically about as many true centers in the W as well - among top players, I can think of the Joneses (Brionna and Jonquel), Griner, Shakira Austin, Cardoso and sorta/kinda Boston and Reese. Even Tina Charles regularly takes and makes treys these days.Agree with your suggestions. I guess my point would be there are very few bigs in the country who are consistent scorers. You may be able to count them on one hand.![]()
Better pro prospect and better college player are not necessarily the same thing.Miles is a better prospect than Van Lith in my mind, but maybe they're both limited.
A'ja did not threaten from beyond the arc in college. Did she even have 20 attempts in 4 years? I'd say the same for her handle. What she had in college was a solid midrange game, a quick leap off the floor on offense and defense, great shot blocking ability and really quick feet. And she was money on putbacks and layups. Like many bigs, her game expanded quite a bit once she got to the W. She is a tremendous shooter and ball handler now. Same is true of the Joneses, Azura, Austin, et all. Their games expanded greatly in the W.Agree with your suggestions. I guess my point would be there are very few bigs in the country who are consistent scorers. You may be able to count them on one hand.![]()
The tweets have since been deleted, but someone responded to this and said they were surprised to see Tennessee on this list, and wondered if Kiyomi was lying again (as she got caught doing on her previous list with Louisville), and Kiyomi responded saying, "Yea I lied lol"Tennessee not shying away from recruiting players with some major red flags. Signed the Pauldo Twins (more so their dad having red flags than the girls), plus UT is apparently in talks with both McMahon and now McMiller. All 4 are extremely talented but I personally wouldn’t touch any with a 10 foot pole if I’m trying to establish a good locker room culture.
Better pro prospect and better college player are not necessarily the same thing.
UhhhhhhhhhhhhThe tweets have since been deleted, but someone responded to this and said they were surprised to see Tennessee on this list, and wondered if Kiyomi was lying again (as she got caught doing on her previous list with Louisville), and Kiyomi responded saying, "Yea I lied lol"
Kind of explains her list.Uhhhhhhhhhhhh
And the demand/desire to be an immediate contributor might be to get (more) NIL.I could never see a scenario where Tessa Johnson would leave SC. However, she has been my favorite player not in a UConn uniform, and her game and size fit UConn like a glove if she ever decided to enter the portal.
Not suggesting poaching, but in this new age of the portal, Tessa owns the top spot on my wish list.
It's bewildering to me seeing the number of first-year freshmen leaving top tier programs like USC, UCLA & ND. I get coach/player conflicts, but it seems the women's game has entered into a one-and-done mentality if things don't go accordingly to plan.
Is it NIL, or the demand to be an immediate contributor?