2024 Maui Invitational Matchups | Page 2 | The Boneyard

2024 Maui Invitational Matchups

Respect your opponents, everyone in this tournament can beat us on any given day. And while I trust we'll be a top ten program in March, this tournament is being played in November. We have to gell
 
Finally get that Memphis match-up they were otherwise supposed to have to do as part of leaving the American. Nice how that requirement kind of went away.
 
It's always said in these tournaments, but there's a huge difference in winning the first game or not with this bracket.

Huge difference from Memphis, likely Colorado/Dayton and Memphis, Michigan St,/top 10 team.
 
Evidently they're only in the field every other year.
And thank goodness they are not in the tournament this year because they are Division 2 if I am not mistaken and playing them means a quality win cannot be earned.
 
Originally I was annoyed that we drew a ho-hum program like Memphis after the past two years, but the more I think about it, I guess it makes sense. Maybe I'm off in my frame of thinking, but this is the only way I can conceptualize it.

#1 UConn vs. #8 Memphis
#2 UNC vs. #7 Dayton --opposite side of bracket
#3 ISU vs. #4 Auburn --opposite side of bracket
#5 MSU vs. #6 Colorado

Weird because normally I'd expect a 3-6 matchup and a 4-5 matchup, but I can't see how the committee would put ISU or Auburn lower than MSU. The former two teams are loaded. Am I missing something?
 
Originally I was annoyed that we drew a ho-hum program like Memphis after the past two years, but the more I think about it, I guess it makes sense. Maybe I'm off in my frame of thinking, but this is the only way I can conceptualize it.

#1 UConn vs. #8 Memphis
#2 UNC vs. #7 Dayton --opposite side of bracket
#3 ISU vs. #4 Auburn --opposite side of bracket
#5 MSU vs. #6 Colorado

Weird because normally I'd expect a 3-6 matchup and a 4-5 matchup, but I can't see how the committee would put ISU or Auburn lower than MSU. The former two teams are loaded. Am I missing something?
I could be wrong but I don't think it's setup as a true 1 v 8, 2 v 7 bracket. If it is we're definitely not the 1 seed because Dayton and Colorado are projected to be significantly worse than Memphis
 
I could be wrong but I don't think it's setup as a true 1 v 8, 2 v 7 bracket. If it is we're definitely not the 1 seed because Dayton and Colorado are projected to be significantly worse than Memphis
NJHoops mentioned we were obligated to play Memphis as part of leaving the AAC, so maybe we are the #1 seed but asked them to adjust the bracket to make sure we play Memphis and are done with that obligation?
 
It appears Penny is losing too many players every year

We know what that's like
 
Originally I was annoyed that we drew a ho-hum program like Memphis after the past two years, but the more I think about it, I guess it makes sense. Maybe I'm off in my frame of thinking, but this is the only way I can conceptualize it.

#1 UConn vs. #8 Memphis
#2 UNC vs. #7 Dayton --opposite side of bracket
#3 ISU vs. #4 Auburn --opposite side of bracket
#5 MSU vs. #6 Colorado

Weird because normally I'd expect a 3-6 matchup and a 4-5 matchup, but I can't see how the committee would put ISU or Auburn lower than MSU. The former two teams are loaded. Am I missing something?
I think if you change the seeding to "TV popularity" or "fanbase size" from "how good they'll be" you'll see a better fitting pattern.

1 UNC - 8 Dayton
4 Auburn - 5 ISU
3 MSU - 6 Colorado
2 UConn - 7 Memphis

Then you flip the bracket so that the best matchups are in primetime.
 
I wonder how good their opponent was, MSU is on a Euro tour


Seems like a mid tier team from a decent Euro pro league (Adriatic - ABA), so pretty good competition. Probably roughly comparable to a G-league team, who would pretty much all be favored over college teams. Assuming it was their A team, a 5 point loss is a decent result.
 
Seems like a mid tier team from a decent Euro pro league (Adriatic - ABA), so pretty good competition. Probably roughly comparable to a G-league team, who would pretty much all be favored over college teams. Assuming it was their A team, a 5 point loss is a decent result.
I've never heard of most of these guys but they're definitely a lot older than a college team. Nate Watson, who was a pretty good player at PC, is on the team.


 
Izzo has been a major thorn in UConn's side. Overall record against Michigan St. is only 4-4, including a devastating Final Four loss, UConn's only loss ever in the Final Four. Izzo has also handled UConn the last 2 meetings. It's about time for Danny to put a major smackdown on them, hopefully in the 2nd round.
 

Online statistics

Members online
239
Guests online
3,308
Total visitors
3,547

Forum statistics

Threads
164,206
Messages
4,387,336
Members
10,195
Latest member
ArtTheFan


.
..
Top Bottom