bballnut90
LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 7,388
- Reaction Score
- 32,987
Wow--that was not what I expected at all. That was far and away the best performance of any team this season. Louisville absolutely obliterated Notre Dame on both ends of the court. Wow. They were up 94-53 before Walz pulled Durr and Hines Allen. This is Notre Dame who was 66-2 in conference play since joining the ACC and has been the perennial #2 team in women's basketball for the last 6-7 years.
Quick thoughts/observations:
1. That was the weakest effort I've ever seen from a McGraw coached team. Zero ball movement, everyone looked frazzled, and there was no effort defensively. Hines Allen was fantastic, but she had way too many open midrange jumpers. She shot 15-20--put a body on her! Durr also had several looks that were wide open. Not sure what the ND guards were thinking, she shoots 50% from deep with a number of her looks being contested and they gave her wide open shots. She should be top priority on a scouting report and she had great looks all night. There were a few plays where Arike just looked straight up lazy, and several players in the 3rd quarter where no one got back defensively besides Mabrey to challenge Louisville. Horrible effort on both ends of the court. I'll give some sympathy since they don't have any depth, but they just gave up. Mabrey was the lone Notre Dame player who I thought really gave her best effort. She was extremely rattled and was pressured playing point guard against Louisville's quick guards, but I thought she battled out there....which brings me to my next point.
2. Notre Dame is going to have a very difficult time if they face teams with quick guards who can disrupt Mabrey. Without Thompson available to come in and alleviate Marina, the only other options are Arike, who is far from a PG, and Young, who is also far from a point guard. For that matter, Mabrey really isn't a point guard either. She's best utilized as a 2 or 3. She isn't a great decision maker and the role is definitely affecting her play.
3. I wouldn't count out Notre Dame yet. They did beat UCONN in 3/4 quarters and all 5 of their starters are very capable scorers, but I am very curious to see how they'll do in a rematch with Louisville in the ACC Tournament...assuming there's a rematch.
4. Louisville could not have played any better than they did tonight. Durr and Hines Allen were ridiculously good, but I thought Fuehring and Shook were the unsung heroes of the night. They did most of the dirty work and made things very difficult for Notre Dame when they drove the lane. Great defensive showing. Carter and Jones were also fantastic. The starting 5 shot 38-53...that's almost 72% from the field. That, combined with an incredible defensive performance led to a 41 point differential before the stars were pulled. I don't think that will ever happen again for Louisville, but wow that was incredible.
5. If I'm a UCONN fan, I'm not more nervous about matching up with Louisville. This game was an anomaly compared to the rest of their showings this year. This was their '2013 Baylor' game. The last 5 games they've scored 66, 62, 55, 74 and 67. Durr has a knack for playing great in big games, but I don't think they'll bring a similar effort next month.
6. I DO think Louisville is a major Final Four contender after tonight. Walz's teams in the past have struggled with consistency--they can bring a big effort like this and then they'll bring a lackluster effort in the next few games. It seems like that's been the case this year, as they've had some really great wins (tonight, Oregon, Michigan), but have had some poor efforts too (SDSU, GT, NC State). Curious to see how it shakes out. They blew me away tonight htough.
Quick thoughts/observations:
1. That was the weakest effort I've ever seen from a McGraw coached team. Zero ball movement, everyone looked frazzled, and there was no effort defensively. Hines Allen was fantastic, but she had way too many open midrange jumpers. She shot 15-20--put a body on her! Durr also had several looks that were wide open. Not sure what the ND guards were thinking, she shoots 50% from deep with a number of her looks being contested and they gave her wide open shots. She should be top priority on a scouting report and she had great looks all night. There were a few plays where Arike just looked straight up lazy, and several players in the 3rd quarter where no one got back defensively besides Mabrey to challenge Louisville. Horrible effort on both ends of the court. I'll give some sympathy since they don't have any depth, but they just gave up. Mabrey was the lone Notre Dame player who I thought really gave her best effort. She was extremely rattled and was pressured playing point guard against Louisville's quick guards, but I thought she battled out there....which brings me to my next point.
2. Notre Dame is going to have a very difficult time if they face teams with quick guards who can disrupt Mabrey. Without Thompson available to come in and alleviate Marina, the only other options are Arike, who is far from a PG, and Young, who is also far from a point guard. For that matter, Mabrey really isn't a point guard either. She's best utilized as a 2 or 3. She isn't a great decision maker and the role is definitely affecting her play.
3. I wouldn't count out Notre Dame yet. They did beat UCONN in 3/4 quarters and all 5 of their starters are very capable scorers, but I am very curious to see how they'll do in a rematch with Louisville in the ACC Tournament...assuming there's a rematch.
4. Louisville could not have played any better than they did tonight. Durr and Hines Allen were ridiculously good, but I thought Fuehring and Shook were the unsung heroes of the night. They did most of the dirty work and made things very difficult for Notre Dame when they drove the lane. Great defensive showing. Carter and Jones were also fantastic. The starting 5 shot 38-53...that's almost 72% from the field. That, combined with an incredible defensive performance led to a 41 point differential before the stars were pulled. I don't think that will ever happen again for Louisville, but wow that was incredible.
5. If I'm a UCONN fan, I'm not more nervous about matching up with Louisville. This game was an anomaly compared to the rest of their showings this year. This was their '2013 Baylor' game. The last 5 games they've scored 66, 62, 55, 74 and 67. Durr has a knack for playing great in big games, but I don't think they'll bring a similar effort next month.
6. I DO think Louisville is a major Final Four contender after tonight. Walz's teams in the past have struggled with consistency--they can bring a big effort like this and then they'll bring a lackluster effort in the next few games. It seems like that's been the case this year, as they've had some really great wins (tonight, Oregon, Michigan), but have had some poor efforts too (SDSU, GT, NC State). Curious to see how it shakes out. They blew me away tonight htough.