Can you say numerical….
Can you say numerical….
This is what I recall from Aruda's chart. Most of the D groups (and some on O) were just listed.... not as 1's and 2'sTweet deleted, anyone got the depth chart?
This is what I recall from Aruda's chart. Most of the D groups (and some on O) were just listed.... not as 1's and 2's
View attachment 103180
Numerical on skill positions:
The 2023 is a template header typo - the skill players are listed numerically - Fagnano is #2 and Evers is #3,Why does it say 2023 and why Fagnano listed first and Evers second?
It was a 4-way OR.. that ultimately Mora revealed isn't really an OR.. it's EversWhy does it say 2023 and why Fagnano listed first and Evers second?
There are clearer pictures of big foot...
Of course there are, he's all over the place.There are clearer pictures of big foot...
I like Porter as WR3 and Murawski earning the chance to develop. I don't like Rosa at RB 4. Maybe Edwards and Robinson are just that good. Getting hyped!Official Game #1 -
View attachment 103202
They’re in numerical orderI like Porter as WR3 and Murawski earning the chance to develop. I don't like Rosa at RB 4. Maybe Edwards and Robinson are just that good. Getting hyped!
Why post a 2 deep that looks like a roster?Official Game #1 -
View attachment 103202
learn to codeWhy post a 2 deep that looks like a roster?
Auburn with 37 starters on D, it's like our right end room last year.