- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 15,889
- Reaction Score
- 90,173
Unfortunately he's out a lot of money after betting on the Mavericks since he was 100% sure they were going to beat the Celtics.Care to wager ?
Unfortunately he's out a lot of money after betting on the Mavericks since he was 100% sure they were going to beat the Celtics.Care to wager ?
Reed was higher rated than Clingan coming out of high school. Regardless, I love how Hurley exploits his players strengths depending on match ups which I also believe drives the team culture and individuals confidence, even if they are not starting.Samson is starting, it's a lock.
If you watch both of their highlights from last season, Reed is a much more skilled big man. Two things will keep Reed from starting - he doesn't pick up Hurley's system and somehow Samson makes an absurd leap in skill and IQ this summer. Samson started at the 4 before getting injured and became our backup center. He doesn't have the size to defend the 5 position similar to Coleman Hawkins.When Hurley re-recruited Samson during the 2023 szn do you think his pitch was “play behind Clingan for a year and then play behind the starting center from the worst team in the power 5” OR “play behind Clingan for a year and then start during your senior season” ?
Samson has flaws but let’s be real about Reed, he has some major major issues. There are maybe a handful of centers that could have transferred in and taken Samson’s spot and Reed sure as heck ain’t one of them. If we did reel a starting caliber center I don’t see Samson sticking around to play back up in his last year of eligibility.
If you watch both of their highlights from last season, Reed is a much more skilled big man. Two things will keep Reed from starting - he doesn't pick up Hurley's system and somehow Samson makes an absurd leap in skill and IQ this summer. Samson did start at the 4 before getting injured and then became our backup center
I’d just give 5 of stews minutes at SF/3rd G to Ball so they’re both at 20mpg. Otherwise agree.Agreed. This is how I'd imagine minutes. I'm wrong on this every year, but it's fun to imagine. I think we may be deep enough to have our guys max out at 30 mpg. More like 22-23 than 23-24 in that regard. This is my "big game" minutes, so ignore the spot minutes you might see from the bench guys. We're going 9 deep.
PG: Hass 25, Nowell 15
SG: Mahaney 25, Solo 15
SF: McNeeley, 25, Stewart 15
PF: AK 30, Stewart 10
C: Reed 25, Samson 15
I think this is going to be a developmental year for Abraham and Ross. It will be their time (as well as Nowell) when AK and McNeeley (and Hass) are gone.
Care to wager ?
Ok. Game 1 starter. You have Samson. I have Reed. Stakes?Yeah let’s do it.
Let’s side barOk. Game 1 starter. You have Samson. I have Reed. Stakes?
Good idea.Let’s side bar
Those were a few highlights vs. Penn State and some others. Adama’s footwork worked vs everyone.He has footwork like Adama with greater size and strength.
Reads as kind of harsh evaluation! For college bball I’d say he’s def better than avg. Whether he’s better than Reed or not though remains to be seen.Samson has demonstrated absolutely zero so far to auto warrant top 5 team starter minutes. He was dreadful in key stretches this year, rebounding rate was abysmal, foul rate was crazy, has no offensive game other than dunking. The dunking was a product of amazing guards and system. In many of the games where we blew teams out, his +\- was in the red. He gets pushed around a ton, has a high center of gravity on a slight frame. Yes he has flashes, and eye catching moments with the dunks, and is great in transition. Don’t overvalue the highlight play dunks, they’re worth 2 points like all other baskets not 3s. Many of the loyalists want to pay it back to him, but if you take him on pure skills he’s an average starting 5 at best. It was often a massive downgrade when he was in and only buying time till Clingan got his rest.
I’m pulling for the kid as much as anyone and hope he makes a leap, but based on what I’ve seen I’m cautious to think it’s going to happen. I’ll eat crow if it does, happily.
Reed if nothing else is a much bigger and stronger kid, with nice touch. I see much higher upside with him. Danny will figure it out.
Obviously they're different players and there's no use arguing over who is better. But DAMN this kid has potential in the post. He's got good size, strong as hell, some crafty footwork, super nimble for his size.
He's a potential all-conference player if he cleans up his decision-making. I mean, just the the second play of that video is an elite offensive movement only a handful of D1 centers can even try to pull off. It's obvious why we prioritized him.
Nice pivoting and spins and step-throughs.. Finishes with both hands consistently. Nice feel on the o-boards. Fights hard for position.
Michigan ran the worst offense I've ever seena high-major team run. Literally. Reed was basically asked to force up 1v1 shots with no movement or outlet to shooters every game. And his shooting %s still weren't bad. Surround him with some safety valves on those post-ups and he will cut his TO rate by a third. Get more easy buckets off elite offense? Make that cut it in half.
Sanogo was a two time first team BE and the MOP of the final four, put some respect on his name. I think we need to pump the brakes on the hyperbole around here with regards to the new guysYeah, I agree. I said earlier I think he can be a better version of Sanogo due to his athleticism.
Sanogo was a two time first team BE and the MOP of the final four, put some respect on his name. I think we need to pump the brakes on the hyperbole around here with regards to the new guys
For example, some games Tarris starts, others Samson…some games Stewart, others McNeeley, etc.
Are you new to the boneyard?I think we need to pump the brakes on the hyperbole around here with regards to the new guys
This coaching staff has proven they are now the innovators of CBB…
While every staff scouts and game-plans for each game, it would be wild if they start to craft an opponent-specific strategy hyper-focused to the point of having interchangeable starting lineups to maximize mismatches for as many minutes as possible based on the projected starters/subs of the other team.
We’ve got 10+ deep amazing talent with different enough toolboxes to make it happen.
For example, some games Tarris starts, others Samson…some games Stewart, others McNeeley, etc.
Can’t wait to see what our boys have in store for us in the Fall!
You and @husky429 are likely right but I keep all doors open for innovation with our coaching staff. Gotta stay ahead of the imitators!The starting lineups won’t change but the amount of minutes distributed between the rest of the players will
You know if you swap out "Twitter" for "X" the tweets will appear in your post, right? It's fine if you don't feel like doing it, but I just wanted to make sure you were aware of it as an option.
Nice find on the tweet.