15 (Possibly) unbreakable sports records | Page 3 | The Boneyard

15 (Possibly) unbreakable sports records

And, IIRC, 705 complete games. (Oops! it’s 749. And I call myself a quant.)
If someone today averaged 20 wins every season for 25 straight years they would still fall short of 511 wins. How many pitchers in the last 25 years have had two or more 20 win seasons in their career?
 
I can't believe no one mentioned Stewie and four MOP's.

You have to stop and think about how difficult that was/is. IceKareem (Lew Alcindor wasn't allowed to play as a freshman) won three and a handful of men and women have won two.
Getting to a final four is difficult. Winning the National championship is more difficult. Winning the Most Outstanding Player is Through the roof.

For the record I think Sarah Strong should have won it this year (Nothing against Azzi, she was also deserving).
 
-Lebron's 8 straight final appearances (as the leading scorer on every team too).

-Lebron's career playoff points (8,267 and counting), 2nd place is at 5,987.

-Caitlin Clark's points generated in college. I'm not sure if anyone has calculated how many points her assists created, but likely she's around 6500 point scored or assisted on, which puts her around 1500ish points ahead of 2nd place (Sabrina Ionescu)

-Misty May/Kerri Walsh winning 21 consecutive Olympic matches together and at one point had a 112 match win streak. Kerri Walsh I believe had 26 consecutive wins at the Olympics across 4 events.

-USA women's basketball winning 8 straight gold medals over 28 years

-I don't know any crazy Simone Biles numbers, but she's surely on this list somewhere.

-Penn State volleyball in 2008 went 114-2 in sets won, and had 111 consecutive sets won across 2 seasons. They also had 111 consecutive matches won from 2007-2010 and won the championship all 4 years.

-Courtney Paris's 2034 career rebounds in college. She's about 200 ahead of 2nd place.

-John Stockton 3265 career steals, he's 500+ ahead of Chris Paul who is in 2nd place at 39 years of age.

-Oksana Chusovitina competing as an Olympic gymnast in 8 separate Olympic games until she was 46 years old. Most gymnasts retire in their early 20s.

-Diana Taurasi winning 6 gold medals in women's basketball
 
Mariano Rivera’s 652 career saves, 0.70 era in the playoffs and had 44 saves at age 43 with a 2.11 era, no closer is eclipsing any other those accolades.
 
.-.
Just think how much his point total would be if he played 4 years like players can but nobody does today. Different era.

Sorry if these records were already mentioned.

Pete Maravich of LSU holds the all-time NCAA Division I records for career scoring (3,667) and average (44.2). [3][4][5] His three consecutive scoring titles from 1968 to 1970 are also the three highest single-season averages in NCAA history. [3] Nine players have earned multiple scoring titles.
 
I think the mantle homerun in Chicago was where the ball was found. In other words wasn’t hit that distance on a fly but rather where it stopped rolling.
 
Michael Johnson's double double gold medals in Olympics 100 m and 200 m in consecutive Olympics.
 
Just think how much his point total would be if he played 4 years like players can but nobody does today. Different era.

Sorry if these records were already mentioned.

Pete Maravich of LSU holds the all-time NCAA Division I records for career scoring (3,667) and average (44.2). [3][4][5] His three consecutive scoring titles from 1968 to 1970 are also the three highest single-season averages in NCAA history. [3] Nine players have earned multiple scoring titles.
Caitlyn Clark (3951 pts) passed the career mark, but Pete played in the era of Freshmen didn't play (same as Kareem), so his 3667 pts was done in 83 games, whereas Caitlyn's record was done in 139 games.

Pete's 44.2 ppg is just ridiculous (Caitlyn's was 28.4 ppg).
 
Just like Pete Maravich being a 3-time All-American 1st teamer @ LSU, the age old question was why wasn't John Wooden more than a 3-time First team All-American Point Guard at Purdue U.? Answer: Freshmen were not allowed to play college basketball.
 
.-.
Caitlyn Clark (3951 pts) passed the career mark, but Pete played in the era of Freshmen didn't play (same as Kareem), so his 3667 pts was done in 83 games, whereas Caitlyn's record was done in 139 games.

Pete's 44.2 ppg is just ridiculous (Caitlyn's was 28.4 ppg).
Plus there were no 3 pt baskets when Maravich played. Clark made a lot of 3pt baskets which made a difference in her career point total.

"The amazing thing about Pete is 44 points per game, in his career, for three straight years in an era with no three-point line. Dale Brown, who coached LSU after Press and Pete were there, went back and charted all the games with the running score – Maravich free-throw, Maravich 22-foot jumper, Maravich layup – and he calculated that with the current college 3-point line rule at 19'9" Pete Maravich would have averaged 13 three-point makes per game, which would have given him a career average of 57 points per game under today's rules!"
 
Last edited:
Rather than Bolt’s 100m record, they should have posted the women’s record. FloJo set the current record, 10.49, in 1988. It was a full quarter of a second better than the record that Evelyn Ashford set four years earlier. Evidently there’s some controversy whether it was wind-aided.
How do you measure a quarter of a second? Not with a Timex!!
 
or Carmel H.S., IN girls just won their 39th straight State Championship in Feb, 2025 (current streak) which probably be broken next year by them as well. They just scored 448 points... so wherever they get beat, it will probably be unbreakable.
Oh yes, good ol Carmel. They only have 179 state championships through the years.
We used to joke how you knew you were in Carmel?
There is a school bus going by with state champs on the side.
 
.-.
How do you measure a quarter of a second? Not with a Timex!!
In high school I once came in third in a 220. My measured time was about half a second lower than the guy who came in second. It was the first time timing for the guy who was timing third place, and he started on the sound of the gun rather than when seeing the smoke.

Human reactions are why all timing is electronic now.
 
In high school I once came in third in a 220. My measured time was about half a second lower than the guy who came in second. It was the first time timing for the guy who was timing third place, and he started on the sound of the gun rather than when seeing the smoke.

Human reactions are why all timing is electronic now.
the amount of time it takes sound to travel the distance from the gun (in the 100 and 200) to the finish line is relatively close to the average untrained reaction time.

So if reacting to seeing the smoke, you should end up starting the watch at about the same time you do hear the sound. Your timer probably was crap...in your favor! but good timers will use both the smoke and the sound to really lock in. At the very least, it meant the timers at our meets were pretty consistent among the lot. I could (humblebrag) pretty consistently beat the sound of the gun in the 100m, but it was more important to be consistent with everyone else.
 
the amount of time it takes sound to travel the distance from the gun (in the 100 and 200) to the finish line is relatively close to the average untrained reaction time.

So if reacting to seeing the smoke, you should end up starting the watch at about the same time you do hear the sound. Your timer probably was crap...in your favor! but good timers will use both the smoke and the sound to really lock in. At the very least, it meant the timers at our meets were pretty consistent among the lot. I could (humblebrag) pretty consistently beat the sound of the gun in the 100m, but it was more important to be consistent with everyone else.
Uh, no. You see the smoke 0.6 second before you hear the pop. So no matter the reaction time, the reaction starts that much later if you’re reacting to the sound than if you’re reacting to the smoke. Whether the person is trained or not is about a tenth of a second, much smaller than the time it takes for sound to travel 200m.
 
Uh, no. You see the smoke 0.6 second before you hear the pop. So no matter the reaction time, the reaction starts that much later if you’re reacting to the sound than if you’re reacting to the smoke. Whether the person is trained or not is about a tenth of a second, much smaller than the time it takes for sound to travel 200m.
What? It's about 130m diagonally across the track. It takes sounds .35s or so to travel that distance.

Me thinks you missed the day they taught pythagorean formula in math. Plus it's a curve, not a square with two 100m edges. The diagonal across a football field is a good estimate of the distance.


Edit: Scoped it out on an actual track on google maps (Uconn's track fwiw). it's ~120m as the crow flies from where a starter should stand to start a 200m race to the finish line. This is .35s....as stated....nowhere near the .6 seconds you suggest.
 
Last edited:
What? It's about 130m diagonally across the track. It takes sounds .35s or so to travel that distance.

Me thinks you missed the day they taught pythagorean formula in math. Plus it's a curve, not a square with two 100m edges. The diagonal across a football field is a good estimate of the distance.


Edit: Scoped it out on an actual track on google maps (Uconn's track fwiw). it's ~120m as the crow flies from where a starter should stand to start a 200m race to the finish line. This is .35s....as stated....nowhere near the .6 seconds you suggest.
The 220 on my high school track was straight. 200 m at 330 m/s is 0.6 s.
 
.-.
2004 Red Sox, down 0-3 to NYY, rips off 7 straight wins vs NYY and STL to beat STL Cards in the World Series.

2011 UConn Men's BB, 11 straight wins in BE tourney and NCAA tourney to win it all.
 
2004 Red Sox, down 0-3 to NYY, rips off 7 straight wins vs NYY and STL to beat STL Cards in the World Series.

2011 UConn Men's BB, 11 straight wins in BE tourney and NCAA tourney to win it all.
Not cool to bring up 2004 lol, that was just a historic run by the Redsox knew my Yankees were cooked after the Sox had back to back walk offs against Mariano in games 4 and 5.

Well we're all UConn fans though 2011 was amazing winning 5 games in 5 days, then pulling it off in the tourney.
 
Not cool to bring up 2004 lol, that was just a historic run by the Redsox knew my Yankees were cooked after the Sox had back to back walk offs against Mariano in games 4 and 5.

Well we're all UConn fans though 2011 was amazing winning 5 games in 5 days, then pulling it off in the tourney.
I was working in SE CT in 2004, in the middle of serious NYY fandom kingdom. I stayed up and watched all of those games, and then had to be on the road by 6:45 am to get to the office by 8 am. My boss was also a BRS fan. Needless to say, there was A LOT of coffee consumed over those 16 days. One IT guy humorously needled me throughout both series and wanted me to make predictions. My response - I'm a Red Sox fan, and a realist, not an idealist. LOL
 
Not cool to bring up 2004 lol, that was just a historic run by the Redsox knew my Yankees were cooked after the Sox had back to back walk offs against Mariano in games 4 and 5.

Well we're all UConn fans though 2011 was amazing winning 5 games in 5 days, then pulling it off in the tourney.
Funny thing is it was an off year for UConn. No bye in the BE tournament. They were lucky to get a 7 seed in the NCAA tournament. But they went nuts at the right time. Considering the circumstances it was truly remarkable.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,017
Messages
4,549,735
Members
10,431
Latest member
TeganK


Top Bottom