- Joined
- Nov 23, 2011
- Messages
- 1,729
- Reaction Score
- 4,154
Nm
I think we’re better off hoping those three teams’ metrics/rankings go up; because in no world is three in a row a fluke. We are clearly a vulnerable team; hopefully, by March, the rest of the basketball world sees those losses as not bad.As the season progresses Maui will look more and more like a fluke. Our resume is not as good as our ranking, but IMO the ranking underestimates how good this team is, as strange as that sounds...
Doesn't sound strange to me; we haven't seen this team at their full potential yet.As the season progresses Maui will look more and more like a fluke. Our resume is not as good as our ranking, but IMO the ranking underestimates how good this team is, as strange as that sounds...
I'm less concerned about how good/bad our losses look than about our wins.I think we’re better off hoping those three teams’ metrics/rankings go up; because in no world is three in a row a fluke. We are clearly a vulnerable team; hopefully, by March, the rest of the basketball world sees those losses as not bad.
As a follow-up to this, Evan Miya has us as the #1 team when playing in the Continental US:For context:
KenPom: 12
Bart Torvik: 14
Evan Miya: 12
It makes sense that our AP ranking is higher than the analytics; this shows that the sentiment is that we're better than our metrics, which Maui hurt. That said, if people ignored Maui entirely, we'd rank much higher.
I'm not sure why they don't do it like this, but if you asked me today, on a neutral court against any other team in the country, I think we'd be one of the top 5 teams.
We got lucky staying in the top 25 after Maui. We have moved up 14 spots in 2 weeks, that is more than enough.I expected Top 10. I think too many are still focused on media coverage of the Maui debacle instead of recent big wins.
This is based on talent and coaching.
Gonzaga and Baylor have both.
Texas has neither.