- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,881
- Reaction Score
- 5,952
100%.Do we play in Brooklyn on Friday?
6 Games 3 Sessions during the day.
100%.Do we play in Brooklyn on Friday?
6 Games 3 Sessions during the day.
Yes: 4 games Friday. 2 games Sunday.Do we play in Brooklyn on Friday?
6 Games 3 Sessions during the day.
Watch it happenOverall 1 can't get best 2 seed.
What is the concern with UNC?So We get the best 2 seed by far because ratings? Swap UNC with Tenn and I’ll live with it.
I just don’t want UNC/ISU as our 2 or Auburn/UK as our 4. Don’t care who the 3 is.
This is my concern and also my expectation (not what should happen, but what is likely to happen).East: UConn / UNC / Baylor / Kansas
Midwest: Purdue / Marquette/ Duke / Auburn
South: Houston / Tenn / Creighton / Alabama
West: Iowa St / Arizona / Illinois / Kentucky
Arizona is the worst #2 seed. They should be in our regionThis is my concern and also my expectation (not what should happen, but what is likely to happen).
And yet some of those teams will be gone after the first weekend. There's always a region that gets wiped out early.This is my concern and also my expectation (not what should happen, but what is likely to happen).
That's right, but that's also assuming the committee won't just shift around the S-curve to get their desired result...Overall 1 can't get best 2 seed.
I think that’s exactly what will happen. We are #1 overall and if UNC falls to a 2 seed they’ll be #5 overallUnder the premise that UNC is a 2 seed, the only way we avoid them is if we are the #1 overall and they #5 on the S Curve. I am not certain of both things being true.
This 1000%That's right, but that's also assuming the committee won't just shift around the S-curve to get their desired result...
Stop worryingThis is my concern and also my expectation (not what should happen, but what is likely to happen).
I’m not necessarily worried about ISU either they only go 7 deep with no backcourt depth but it’s the principle we shouldn’t be matched up with the best 2 seed.What is the concern with UNC?
They looked terrible when we played earlier this year. Think we beat them easily even without our A game.
Anyone but Auburn they are closer to a 2 seed than a 4 seed imoOur 2 seed and 3 seed matters, but keep in mind that they need to knock one another out before potentially facing us. Our 4 seed is probably the most important. Say a prayer that it's Kansas because they are getting bounced immediately
That is correct. But if they keep ‘Zona west for geography, we’re not getting UNC or Iowa State. Most likely Tennessee.Arizona is the worst #2 seed. They should be in our region
I have Tenn at 5 and UNC at 6.I think that’s exactly what will happen. We are #1 overall and if UNC falls to a 2 seed they’ll be #5 overall
we shouldnt be matched up with either we should get #8 and if that's marquette we should get #7. we shouldnt get #5 or #6 b/c zona gets to play in the west that would be utter B SI have Tenn at 5 and UNC at 6.
I want Arizona in our bracket. I really think it should be true S-curve, especially since the Arizona will get preference for the first weekend.we shouldnt be matched up with either we should get #8 and if that's marquette we should get #7. we shouldnt get #5 or #6 b/c zona gets to play in the west that would be utter B S
they prioritize location over the S curve for the top 2 seeds.I want Arizona in our bracket. I really think it should be true S-curve, especially since the Arizona will get preference for the first weekend.
Ultimately, I think the only changes to the S-Curve is to avoid conference matchups when possible and early-round re-matches.
1v8, 2v7, 3v6, 4v5 should be the Regional Finals with the 1 seed alone having regional preference.
But, again, let's see who even gets there (including us, NCAAs are nuts).