1/12: NET 25, KenPom: 25 | The Boneyard

1/12: NET 25, KenPom: 25

Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
2,472
Reaction Score
30,356
NET: 25
KenPom: 25
BPI: 12

I know people are upset at DeCoursey and Lunardi, but right now our metrics are in the 5 seed range. The good news? A lof of the teams in front of us are going to beat each other up in the SEC, Big Ten, and Big 12. Keep winning, and our numbers will improve. We have 6 games left against good teams in Marquette/St. John's/Creighton.

Offense is 5 in KenPom, defense is 112. Was 134 to begin the week. 7-4 in Q1/Q2 games.

Notable teams:

Gonzaga: NET:11/KenPom: 9/BPI: 9
Baylor: NET: 19/KenPom: 18/BPI: 11
Texas: NET: 40/KenPom: 39/BPI: 23

Rest of the Big East:

NET:

12. Marquette
25. UConn
28. St. John's
50. Villanova
54. Creighton
62. Xavier
70. Georgetown
83. Providence
88. Butler
131. DePaul
180. Seton Hall

KenPom:

11. Marquette
19. St. John's
25. UConn
44. Creighton
46. Villanova
54. Xavier
63. Georgetown
84. Providence
86. Butler
125. DePaul
151. Seton Hall

BPI:

12. Uconn
14. Marquette
24. St. John's
31. Creighton
39. Villanova
51. Xavier
71. Butler
72. Providence
73. Georgetown
109. DePaul
114. Seton Hall
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
1,717
Reaction Score
9,118
BPI seems more realistic where we are. I feel like we should be a solid 3 seed at the moment. I don’t think there’s more than 8-12 teams better than us right now.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,678
Reaction Score
13,471
I think the frustrating thing is over the last three games we could have done so much more to improve those metrics:

Providence, up 77-65 with 1:46 to go, win by 3
Villanova, blew it at the end
Georgetown, up 23 with 6:55 to go, win by 8

Should be much higher in the rankings. With McNeeley out my mindset is just to win games but we haven't done ourselves any favors for March these past few games.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
4,342
Reaction Score
43,811
I think the frustrating thing is over the last three games we could have done so much more to improve those metrics:

Providence, up 77-65 with 1:46 to go, win by 3
Villanova, blew it at the end
Georgetown, up 23 with 6:55 to go, win by 8

Should be much higher in the rankings. With McNeeley out my mindset is just to win games but we haven't done ourselves any favors for March these past few games.
The “kill the clock” offense is so painful to watch and tbh I don’t really understand why we do it. Our normal offense takes 20-25 seconds to run anyways. What is the benefit of just dribbling around for 25 seconds and then heaving up a terrible shot? Sure it bleeds the clock the same way our normal offense does, but it kills the spreadsheet math which does make a difference when you are on the edge of a seed line in the NCAAT.

We scored 4 points in the final 8 minutes yesterday. We made a 25 point blowout look like a close game because we just decided to dribble around and get 3 shot clock violations in a row.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,824
Reaction Score
34,986
I think the frustrating thing is over the last three games we could have done so much more to improve those metrics:

Providence, up 77-65 with 1:46 to go, win by 3
Villanova, blew it at the end
Georgetown, up 23 with 6:55 to go, win by 8

Should be much higher in the rankings. With McNeeley out my mindset is just to win games but we haven't done ourselves any favors for March these past few games.

In the post-RPI world, style points matter.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,299
Reaction Score
72,337
myp4T20.png
30Sc3du.png
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
17,071
Reaction Score
27,206
There’s no consideration of us missing one our 2 best players? Fine. This is why I don’t follow this crap even when we were number 2.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,366
Reaction Score
48,438
NET: 25
KenPom: 25
BPI: 12

I know people are upset at DeCoursey and Lunardi, but right now our metrics are in the 5 seed range.

I personally would have no problem if we are a five seed in this year's tournament as we still have that open on our bingo card:

One Seed - 1999; 2024
Two Seed - 2004
Three Seed - 2011
Four Seed - 2023
Seven Seed - 2014

We still need five, seven and eight.

Give us a five seed and let the four seed and one seed in our bracket soil their pants on selection Sunday.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,819
Reaction Score
10,416
I think the frustrating thing is over the last three games we could have done so much more to improve those metrics:

Providence, up 77-65 with 1:46 to go, win by 3
Villanova, blew it at the end
Georgetown, up 23 with 6:55 to go, win by 8

Should be much higher in the rankings. With McNeeley out my mindset is just to win games but we haven't done ourselves any favors for March these past few games.
This is why metrics are only so valuable. No team should be punished, and betters only care about whether you cover rather than whether you win, based on whether you stop playing hard once the game is virtually over. We’ve seen the last two years Hurley teams are willing to stop playing hard, and let leads slip, after the game is won. Not worth getting upset about. The Committee will either figure it out or they won’t.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
57
Reaction Score
768
Based on their body of work to date these rankings are reasonable.

But do I think there are one of 8 to 10 teams with legit chance to win it all? Yes. Just about all of the problems we see - and there are a few - are fixable. Biggest question is can they defend and rebound at a championship level when it counts, and I think the parts are there to make it happen. Just less of a margin for error than in the past 2 years.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 6 >>>1!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,377
Reaction Score
43,906
I personally would have no problem if we are a five seed in this year's tournament as we still have that open on our bingo card:

One Seed - 1999; 2024
Two Seed - 2004
Three Seed - 2011
Four Seed - 2023
Seven Seed - 2014

We still need five, seven and eight.

Give us a five seed and let the four seed and one seed in our bracket soil their pants on selection Sunday.
Five, six, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, and play in game.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
2,020
Reaction Score
8,135
I personally would have no problem if we are a five seed in this year's tournament as we still have that open on our bingo card:

One Seed - 1999; 2024
Two Seed - 2004
Three Seed - 2011
Four Seed - 2023
Seven Seed - 2014

We still need five, seven and eight.

Give us a five seed and let the four seed and one seed in our bracket soil their pants on selection Sunday.
There’s no consideration of us missing one our 2 best players? Fine. This is why I don’t follow this crap even when we were number 2.
I think we’ll be forgiven if we can start humming with Liam back and win a few of those key games against the top half of the BE, particularly on the road. The good news is we can likely work our way back up, with the goal being a 3 seed in the East. It starts with Creighton next game. The Marquette matchups will obviously have significant bearing.

What we should hope for is the Auburns and Iowa Sts (and all 1/2 seed candidates) to keep beating teams we will be battling the 3 seed with. Let them have their 1s and 2s as we aren’t getting that high anyway. For instance the Texas Tech loss to ISU yesterday likely helped our cause. I’d be all for taking on a 2 seed Kansas in Newark in the S16.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
343
Reaction Score
1,134
25th is about right, our defense is brutal.

Feels like yesterday we were down 14 to Providence at home and they were scoring every possession.
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2023
Messages
416
Reaction Score
1,930
We have one of the top few offenses in the country and our defense is improving week by week. There was a significant improvement in our defense this week and it will keep getting better. I expect us to be one of about 10 teams who have a shot to win it all.
one game does not a "defense is improviing week-by-week" make.

Until the georgetown game, the defense was in a freefall since the start of the league season....going from 90's to 140's. ranked.
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
21,177
Reaction Score
46,114
Texas Tech caught a break with St. Joe's moving into top 100 NET, making a Q3 loss only a Q2.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,366
Reaction Score
23,276
5 seed is cool, love to watch the 4 seed and the 1 seed on our bracket crying when the brackets are released and then again after we send them home

Then watch the suits talk about "the body of work", because they can't talk about talent. And they have no idea what the eye test even means.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,533
Reaction Score
23,584
one game does not a "defense is improviing week-by-week" make.

Until the georgetown game, the defense was in a freefall since the start of the league season....going from 90's to 140's. ranked.

You can see the improvement, but we are no where near the last 2 years. This is why end of games is important IMO. But DH knows what he is doing.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
54
Reaction Score
317
Who cares about metrics. We' re ranked 9th!!! Should be a 3 seed at worst, even if we slide a spot tomorrow. Rankings mean nothing now! Ridiculous!
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
1,544
Reaction Score
10,274
one game does not a "defense is improviing week-by-week" make.

Until the georgetown game, the defense was in a freefall since the start of the league season....going from 90's to 140's. ranked.
If you don’t think the defense is improving you must not be watching the games. If other teams didn’t shoot 15-20 more free throws a game than us our KenPom defensive numbers would likely be in the 50’s or 60’s. Our defense in Maui was awful, our defense last week was dramatically improved. Ball and Mahaney specifically have improved in this area. Stewart held arguably the best offensive player in the country to 6-20 from the floor and gave us a chance for a good road win. Maybe you can’t see it coming together, but I certainly can
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
1,676
Reaction Score
14,989
If you don’t think the defense is improving you must not be watching the games. If other teams didn’t shoot 15-20 more free throws a game than us our KenPom defensive numbers would likely be in the 50’s or 60’s. Our defense in Maui was awful, our defense last week was dramatically improved. Ball and Mahaney specifically have improved in this area. Stewart held arguably the best offensive player in the country to 6-20 from the floor and gave us a chance for a good road win. Maybe you can’t see it coming together, but I certainly can
I guess I’d argue that fouling too much is major defensive flaw, and a problem we cannot dismiss so easily. Our defensive free throw rate, which is free throw attempts divided by field goal attempts, is 42.9%. That’s #341 in the country, and the worst among all high majors. Hurley’s teams have historically fouled a lot, but last year’s 31.1% rate was much better. We’re elite at defending against two-point attempts (11th nationally), blocking shots (4th), preventing three-point attempts (7th), and decent at keeping teams off the offensive glass (53rd). Teams are shooting 38.4% from three against us (354th ). There’s a lot of evidence that opponents’ three-point percentage is more luck that skill. If we get that inevitable regression, we just need to foul less to have a defense good enough to go on a run. Our offense is, and will continue to be, awesome.

IMG_8540.jpeg
 

Online statistics

Members online
126
Guests online
1,713
Total visitors
1,839

Forum statistics

Threads
160,770
Messages
4,237,488
Members
10,093
Latest member
Verna


.
Top Bottom