Recent content by Phil

That's likely, but the presentation leaves something to be desired, as there is no hint that they did it that way. Plus, even if you do, you should have: Men #1 Women #1. Listing Geno with #2 makes no sense.

Yes, .841 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Summitt

AI is worse at math than one might expect. I had a friend explain it to me, so it does make sense, but it seems easily fixable.

So that's what BFF stands for.

I am a huge Citron fan but I can't think of any way to justify picking her over Paige.

Excellent point. I've hated realignment for multiple reasons and you've added one more. Many fans underestimate the challenges of putting together a bracket. It's far more complicated than simply ranking them all in placing them in an S surve. Amount other things they have some rules about teams...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023%E2%80%9324_NCAA_Division_I_women%27s_basketball_rankings Last year, there were rankings on March 4, March 11, March 18 than a skip to the April 8 final

Sorry, why do you think this? They have in the past.

Unforunately, no, it was a paid site and I stopped paying.

I read she has already signed a pro contract, so I don't expect her back.

Six ranked unbeaten but eight unbeaten. Buffalo and Portland are undefeated.

Maybe. Massey has Miss at 28, not saying that is the right answer, but suggests 18 might be generous. However, it definitley is not Providence.

And volleyball starts conference tourney this week, with a chance at the NCAA tournament.

You've got it. :)

I get your point, but the AP doesn't do a poll after the NC game