Did anyone have a 32 point win if you knew Alex and Ball would have 9 points each and shot 1-8 from 3? Imagine if they both had a good game.
Good to know they can score when some guys are off.
Reibe matching Reeds numbers with 5 fewer minutes is a good thing.
Weird that Mullins started out...
I do not speak for the people - just saying what I think. There's more to his game that hasn't been tapped. Not having tapped that isn't hurting us, but tapping it can bring us to another level. Just like getting Ball back to shooting around 40% brings us to another level.
I was going to put something in my post that likewise it would also be good if Ball was shooting closer to his historical average instead of 10% below. And it would be good if AK was taking a few more at 42% and also making more bunnies, but I decided to focus just on Reed as that was the player...
I don't think it's hate so much. Even though he is putting up very solid numbers, the eye test says he could be (much?) better. Seems he has a couple rebounds just slip out, a couple of bunnies not get over the rim and obviously a few free throws not go down every game.
He is capable of having...
Well, I don't think you can base your conclusion on one game where we exceeded every prediction model and Vegas by 3 or 4 fold. It's not like you are betting everything every time on one game.
But I also agree there aren't many making money over an extended period of time (years, not weeks)...
Well your initial line wasn't the line. Huge difference between -2.5 and -6.5.
I don't bet but if forced, I go money line on UConn and Creighton with the points.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.