UCONN -8.5 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

UCONN -8.5

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,245
Reaction Score
34,960
No we didn't blow the lead against St John's or Providence. Providence was 6.5 and we won by 7, and St John's was 7.5 and we won by 9
We were up big and never let the win percentage get lower than 93% (in the PC game). Would I have preferred the games stayed in the teens-twenties? Yes—I'd have been much happier without two separate 12-0 runs on PC's side. Was I ever worried? No.

Here's the win probability graphs for each game:
Screen Shot 2023-03-13 at 7.34.46 PM.png



Screen Shot 2023-03-13 at 7.34.18 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,245
Reaction Score
34,960
So it’s 50-50?
Ah, yes. A 1-point road loss in which we controlled most of the game but lost (and a game in which our head coach and some other staff members were out with covid) is 100% equal to the home game we were up 16 and never had less than a 92% chance of winning in the last 10 minutes.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
3,463
Reaction Score
11,276
This was my source.
HuskyWarrior611 might have had a slightly different line from the one on Covers.com when he placed his bet. As I am sure you know, the lines can move slightly near game time depending on which way the bets are going.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,502
Reaction Score
31,493
Ah, yes. A 1-point road loss in which we controlled most of the game but lost (and a game in which our head coach and some other staff members were out with covid) is 100% equal to the home game we were up 16 and never had less than a 92% chance of winning in the last 10 minutes.
\s
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,102
Reaction Score
12,185
If we get past Iona I think we make the sweet 16. Let's see Hurley win more than 1 game in the tourney for he first time.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
1,010
Reaction Score
1,973
No we didn't blow the lead against St John's or Providence. Providence was 6.5 and we won by 7, and St John's was 7.5 and we won by 9
I should have clarified. Blown leads in relation to the spread. They were up 16 on seton hall with 6 minutes. Then a comedy of errors ensued and they didn't cover the 11(?).

They were up 17 on SJU with 13 remaining and barely escaped that one winning by 9 (7.5 pt spread).

Then the debacle that occured at MSG against PC. 26 pt lead widdled down to 5.

They were an ATS machine in OOC when their team rating was low, but lately they aren't exactly killing it when it's pts in excess of 5. Missed FTs and TOs seem to be the norm with big leads.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,536
Reaction Score
66,940
They were an ATS machine in OOC when their team rating was low, but lately they aren't exactly killing it when it's pts in excess of 5. Missed FTs and TOs seem to be the norm with big leads.
So basically you don't trust the team to cover a large spread because we only cover 2/3 of the time when we specifically blow a big lead. Got it.

We're 5-1 ATS in our last 6 in games where we were favored by more than 5.
 
Joined
May 1, 2014
Messages
5,676
Reaction Score
5,894
Yeah I think I got in at 7. Vegas got it back in blood after I got in at the right time for Nova.
I can validate I had -7 which was the opening line for some time. Thankfully I hedged PC in game.

There were definitely some "sweaters" toward the end of the season. The easy bets ended when the losing streak began. I stopped betting us heavy.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2016
Messages
507
Reaction Score
2,596
Just got to win by 1! I'm not a gambler but if I was I, I would bet against my team so at least there's a consolation prize incase they lose.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
1,010
Reaction Score
1,973
Interesting unless the comparative conference strength blows up in your face.

 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,452
Reaction Score
18,170
I'm not betting against Uconn and Marquette in a first round game. Both teams could easily be up by way more.
 

Online statistics

Members online
264
Guests online
2,407
Total visitors
2,671

Forum statistics

Threads
157,339
Messages
4,094,958
Members
9,985
Latest member
stanfordnyc


Top Bottom