Tonyc
Optimus Prime
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,435
- Reaction Score
- 34,638
It is predestined that Felicia "Fee" Aiyeotan will be coming to UConn. We are in danger of losing the multiple names! Bria Hartley and Brianna Banks have left and Briana Pulido and Breanna Stewart will both graduate next year. Kiah and Kia will no longer be together after next year. Obviously we need to add Fee to our next fall's incoming Napheesa "Phee" Collier in order to keep Geno's brain agile. Now that he's in his 60s, too many unique names would probably confuse him
Like the new one better?I think the title of this thread is unfortunate.
The internal investigation is the usual stonewalling. The Pope is going to speak to them about this when he finishes his e-mail lessons. (Thursday Yahoo news feed and Good Morning America.)Unbelievable. That guy Gallagher needs to be hauled into court and put on the stand. Would like to know what if anything is going on with the internal investigation at Wood.
Would like to continue to follow this story. Am not a big fan, as you know, of innuendo hurled at successful rival basketball programs or their players (or players' families).
Like the new one better?
Yes, thank you.Like the new one better?
Oh yes, let's play the race card. That must be it.Unfortunately this hits a little too close to home for me-literally.
Just sent the following letter to the school president and Athletic director.
***************************************************************************
To: gzimmaro@archwood.org,
jsette@archwood.org
Gentlemen,
The situation described in this article is racist, uncharitable, and abusive.It is a prime example of where a coach (John Gallagher) has lost proper perspective. Athletics should be instructive and enriching for all participants. For a grown man representing your Catholic High School to turn his back on an opposing team, consisting of teenage girls and refusing to shake hands is unacceptable.
Remove this coach from his position today!
A concerned Parent, Catholic, Human being.....
http://www.phillyvoice.com/smear-campaign-girls-basketball-neumann-goretti/
Oh he
Oh yes, let's play the race card. That must be it.
How many other speculations are in order?That certainly might be it...you can't discount that card this day and age! Sadly.....
There is no might be in it, the race card is definitely in play here; Not only with the accusation leveled by Coach Gallagher but also with the foot dragging inaction of Archbishop Wood and the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, and with Coach Gallagher's pregame handshake snub.That certainly might be it...you can't discount that card this day and age! Sadly.....
A grown man who would turn his back on young girls and refused to shake hands deserves no benefit of the doubt. Even if it turns out that these girls were somehow able to evade all the checks and enter this country illegally in order to escape a desperate situation at home, Gallagher's behavior is despicable, and could be racist.How many other speculations are in order?
You have some serious basketballs to defend this creep. Just say'n...Oh he
Oh yes, let's play the race card. That must be it.
Sonny,Oh he
Oh yes, let's play the race card. That must be it.
Actually, it’s not a race issue, no matter how much we might try to make it out to be – it’s an African issue and that’s not the same thing as I suspect, being an inner city school, there a number of other black players at Neuman, none of which Gallagher is attacking. The original question is whether the African players – not the black players – but just the African players – are the ages that they claim to be, and there may be at least some legitimacy to that question (though probably just a little).There is no might be in it, the race card is definitely in play here; Not only with the accusation leveled by Coach Gallagher but also with the foot dragging inaction of Archbishop Wood and the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, and with Coach Gallagher's pregame handshake snub.
Actually, it’s not a race issue, no matter how much we might try to make it out to be – it’s an African issue and that’s not the same thing as I suspect, being an inner city school, there a number of other black players at Neuman, none of which Gallagher is attacking. The original question is whether the African players – not the black players – but just the African players – are the ages that they claim to be, and there may be at least some legitimacy to that question (though probably just a little).
I write from personal experience. My siblings have adopted several Asian and African children. We have come to wonder in the last year or so if the Africans are older than what we were told at the time of adoption – they are larger and more athletic than their classmates, for example; though being siblings, an early growth spurt could just run in their biological family. But our African children do seem just generally older, further along in their growth/development – more mature – than their classmates and their American cousins.
In other parts of the world, records aren’t kept as strictly as they are here (our kids came from huts with dirt floors – literally) and it isn’t inconceivable that someone might change a person’s birth date for various reasons, including “adoptability”…or athletic eligibility. While everyone seems to be going gaga over Mo’ne Davis, let’s not forget an earlier Little League World Series hero from a decade earlier, Danny Almonte. It happens.
That doesn’t mean it did happen. But if Gallagher – and this is a very limited and specific defense – is looking at two kids, and just two kids, and they just don’t look like they’re sixteen or seventeen, it may be reasonable to ask that question, without it being a racial issue. How Gallagher handled this is a different matter, and frankly, unacceptable; but from reading the entire article, there’s nothing to indicate that this is a general racial issue, so let’s not make it one.
Actually, it’s not a race issue, no matter how much we might try to make it out to be – it’s an African issue and that’s not the same thing as I suspect, being an inner city school, there a number of other black players at Neuman, none of which Gallagher is attacking. The original question is whether the African players – not the black players – but just the African players – are the ages that they claim to be, and there may be at least some legitimacy to that question (though probably just a little).
I write from personal experience. My siblings have adopted several Asian and African children. We have come to wonder in the last year or so if the Africans are older than what we were told at the time of adoption – they are larger and more athletic than their classmates, for example; though being siblings, an early growth spurt could just run in their biological family. But our African children do seem just generally older, further along in their growth/development – more mature – than their classmates and their American cousins.
In other parts of the world, records aren’t kept as strictly as they are here (our kids came from huts with dirt floors – literally) and it isn’t inconceivable that someone might change a person’s birth date for various reasons, including “adoptability”…or athletic eligibility. While everyone seems to be going gaga over Mo’ne Davis, let’s not forget an earlier Little League World Series hero from a decade earlier, Danny Almonte. It happens.
That doesn’t mean it did happen. But if Gallagher – and this is a very limited and specific defense – is looking at two kids, and just two kids, and they just don’t look like they’re sixteen or seventeen, it may be reasonable to ask that question, without it being a racial issue. How Gallagher handled this is a different matter, and frankly, unacceptable; but from reading the entire article, there’s nothing to indicate that this is a general racial issue, so let’s not make it one.