- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Messages
- 1,428
- Reaction Score
- 1,835
I think replacing USF with Tulsa would make more sense.Those are the 4 schools I think would fit best with the pac 4
Basically up until Herbst, it was never emphasized (with an over reliance on state funding) so we fell woefully behind, making it that much more difficult to catch up. That said, UConn needs to work the heavy hitters in Fairfield County and continue to increase the percentage of alums who give a small amount monthly.Honest question ... why does UConn have such a hard time building a large endowment etc. Do we have less successful grads?
It’s because New England is full of great colleges, and UConn has never tried very hard to increase the endowment. In recent years, they’ve been pushing harder and getting more donations, but that’s not the way it was during the 50s 60s 70s 80s 90s and early 2000s.Honest question ... why does UConn have such a hard time building a large endowment etc. Do we have less successful grads?
I don’t think Memphis fits with the pac schools.. higher education is important to them
USF is vastly better from a research perspective.I think replacing USF with Tulsa would make more sense.
Besides the late start, the biggest issue with the the endowment relative to other schools is compounding of principal over decades. If you return 7% per year, your money will double in a decade.Honest question ... why does UConn have such a hard time building a large endowment etc. Do we have less successful grads?
Basically up until Herbst, it was never emphasized (with an over reliance on state funding) so we fell woefully behind, making it that much more difficult to catch up. That said, UConn needs to work the heavy hitters in Fairfield County and continue to increase the percentage of alums who give a small amount monthly.
they despite having the high end education don't really think smart, tulsa has a better chance than boise or memphis simply cause of academics, which is insanely stupid and limits them severelysurprised that the PAC 4 would be willing to make x-country trips to USF. memphis makes more sense imo. better at football and bball and half the distance.
smu/rice/tulane/memphis is a nice pod, with the PAC 4 being another. the last pod should be the 4 most attractive MW schools: SDSU, Boise, CSU, UNLV?
It's always been a Cartel.That correction was a bad idea. It now seems like the Big 10 and SEC are acting as a cartel.
????UConn just posted they would pay the ACC $10 mill a year for entry.
Balling!
?UConn just posted they would pay the ACC $10 mill a year for entry.
Balling!
There are 18000 posts in the key tweets thread not a single one is a key tweet.Aren't they all non-key until one proves true?
Tulane problem is they simply didn’t view sport’s as important to an educational institution. Memphis problem is they don’t view academics as important to an educational institution . The thing with a school like Tulane they can get back in the game with a smart investment In sports , with Memphis the hill is a lot steeper .If true Memphis fans will be apoplectic falling behind Rice, Tulane and USF.