- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Messages
- 1,433
- Reaction Score
- 1,856
This will change the media narrative.We need hotter cheerleaders. No need for student cheerleaders. Get some professionals.
Nobody really wins. Another conference who has been around forever was destroyed, regional rivalries were destroyed, everyone will be flying all over the country for non-revenue sports...This has a peaceful ending in my opinion. Stanford and Cal take only 50% shares to go to the ACC. The expansion holdouts get compensation.
The Pac-12 invites all 12 MW institutions and Gonzaga.
The CFP goes to a 5/7 format instead of 6/6.
Everybody but OSU and WSU wins.
Wait! We win!?!?!This has a peaceful ending in my opinion. Stanford and Cal take only 50% shares to go to the ACC. The expansion holdouts get compensation.
The Pac-12 invites all 12 MW institutions and Gonzaga.
The CFP goes to a 5/7 format instead of 6/6.
Everybody but OSU and WSU wins.
I don’t debate that even though I think college sports are better with 6-7 top tier regional leagues.Nobody really wins. Another conference who has been around forever was destroyed, regional rivalries were destroyed, everyone will be flying all over the country for non-revenue sports...
This is like other people saying UConn has FCS facilities.Awesome that Cal, who sucks at everything and has no fans, will get a landing spot.
If the Pac is rebuilding and we can join as a football only, I don't see why not. Dream -- have a 12 team conference with an eastern flank of UConn, USF, Temple and Navy, a western flank of the four remaining Pac members and a central part of, say, San Diego State, SMU, and two others. The eastern flank are all football only members. UConn stays in the Big East, Temple goes back to the A-Ten (which would be good for their hoops as well), Navy stays in the Patriot and USF finds a southern conference without football. As to the eastern schools, three have played at a P-6 level when the Big East had a guaranteed big time bowl for their champion, and Navy has competed at a near P05 level for most of hte last 20 years. Plus, those are all schools that don't embarass Stanford and Cal academically.Navy FB to sail independent seas? Or, potentially Midshipmen FB in new PAC west?
Hypothetical, UConn FB in the east. Would UConn be interested in the latter ? ? ? No strong opinion, just tossed out for discussion purposes only.
I've thought the same except Army instead of Temple.If the Pac is rebuilding and we can join as a football only, I don't see why not. Dream -- have a 12 team conference with an eastern flank of UConn, USF, Temple and Navy, a western flank of the four remaining Pac members and a central part of, say, San Diego State, SMU, and two others. The eastern flank are all football only members. UConn stays in the Big East, Temple goes back to the A-Ten (which would be good for their hoops as well), Navy stays in the Patriot and USF finds a southern conference without football. As to the eastern schools, three have played at a P-6 level when the Big East had a guaranteed big time bowl for their champion, and Navy has competed at a near P05 level for most of hte last 20 years. Plus, those are all schools that don't embarass Stanford and Cal academically.
Do you understand They’re the Flagship University of the most populous state in The US with 40 million people . They have assets of $136 billion and are typically ranked as the top public academic institutions in the country and is world famous .Awesome that Cal, who sucks at everything and has no fans, will get a landing spot.
I've thought the same except Army instead of Temple.
UConn should approach the PAC 4 with a football only conference like this, and honestly you don't even need the central division (and can replace USF with Army). I posted the following a week ago:If the Pac is rebuilding and we can join as a football only, I don't see why not. Dream -- have a 12 team conference with an eastern flank of UConn, USF, Temple and Navy, a western flank of the four remaining Pac members and a central part of, say, San Diego State, SMU, and two others. The eastern flank are all football only members. UConn stays in the Big East, Temple goes back to the A-Ten (which would be good for their hoops as well), Navy stays in the Patriot and USF finds a southern conference without football. As to the eastern schools, three have played at a P-6 level when the Big East had a guaranteed big time bowl for their champion, and Navy has competed at a near P05 level for most of hte last 20 years. Plus, those are all schools that don't embarass Stanford and Cal academically.
UConn should approach the ACC and offer to join for free for 7 years like SMU. If Cal, Stanford, and SMU are invited (ND will not join), it doesn't make sense to have 17 football members. You need an even number if you go to 9 conferences games, which makes sense if you have more than 14 members.UConn should approach the PAC 4 with a football only conference like this, and honestly you don't even need the central division (and can replace USF with Army). I posted the following a week ago:
West
Stanford (Olympic in WCC)
Cal (Olympic in WCC)
OSU (Olympic in WCC)
WSU (Olympic in WCC)
East
UConn (Olympic in Big East)
Army (Olympic in Patriot)
Navy (Olympic in Patriot)
Temple (Olympic in A10 or Big East)
Would be an interesting football conference that has no impact on basketball/Olympic. Could even get some baseball series with Stanford/Cal/OSU...
Notre Dame might also find this conference kind of attractive for a scheduling deal. Stanford, Army (at Yankee Stadium), Navy (at FedEx), UConn (at Fenway), Temple (at Lincoln). Could "leave" the ACC and park Olympics in the Big East.
The reason I think my scenario is more likely is that it leaves the 4 PAC schools with an 8 team conference with the PAC name that stays western, if not pacific. I think that would be preferable than joining the WCC. And it’s their conference to invite whom they want.UConn should approach the PAC 4 with a football only conference like this, and honestly you don't even need the central division (and can replace USF with Army). I posted the following a week ago:
West
Stanford (Olympic in WCC)
Cal (Olympic in WCC)
OSU (Olympic in WCC)
WSU (Olympic in WCC)
East
UConn (Olympic in Big East)
Army (Olympic in Patriot)
Navy (Olympic in Patriot)
Temple (Olympic in A10 or Big East)
Would be an interesting football conference that has no impact on basketball/Olympic. Could even get some baseball series with Stanford/Cal/OSU...
Notre Dame might also find this conference kind of attractive for a scheduling deal. Stanford, Army (at Yankee Stadium), Navy (at FedEx), UConn (at Fenway), Temple (at Lincoln). Could "leave" the ACC and park Olympics in the Big East.
Stanford is offering to join the ACC for free for several years. They're gone.The reason I think my scenario is more likely is that it leaves the 4 PAC schools with an 8 team conference with the PAC name that stays western, if not pacific. I think that would be preferable than joining the WCC. And it’s their conference to invite whom they want.
UConn should approach the ACC and offer to join for free for 7 years like SMU. If Cal, Stanford, and SMU are invited (ND will not join), it doesn't make sense to have 17 football members. You need an even number if you go to 9 conferences games, which makes sense if you have more than 14 members.
You get in the club first and get paid later. We would get a half share starting in 2031 and a full share in 2036.Isn't the concern with UConn athletics not being in the P4 a monetary one? So the solution would be to join the P4...for zero media dollars?
Do you realize that most of their students don’t care about US sports at all?Do you understand They’re the Flagship University of the most populous state in The US with 40 million people . They have assets of $136 billion and are typically ranked as the top public academic institutions in the country and is world famous .
The only shocking thing about CaL is with that type of weight they find themselves on the outside at all .
Stanford and Cal ignored athletics as trivial entertainment for the masses or they would both be in the B1G . It demonstrates that if you want to play you better be serous
It's lunacy in here. Next they'll be saying UConn should pay Oregon State and Washington State for the privilege of sharing a conference with them. They've completely lost the script.Isn't the concern with UConn athletics not being in the P4 a monetary one? So the solution would be to join the P4...for zero media dollars?
What are you talking about? UConn would forego media distributions for seven years. If Stanford and SMU are willing to do it to get into the club, why aren't we? This isn't the Big 12. This is the ACC- a league we have been trying to get into for years. A league with our former rivals (Syracuse, Pitt, BC, Louisville) + Tobacco Road. If we get a half share starting in 2031 and a full share in 2036, we would be foolish not to accept. We get less than 4.5 million per year from our TV deals. We can survive seven years of lost TV revenue with just the uptick in ticket sales alone. Put your pride at the door.It's lunacy in here. Next they'll be saying UConn should pay Oregon State and Washington State for the privilege of sharing a conference with them. They've completely lost the script.
Stanford doesn't have a conference and they aren't going to play for free in the ACC for 7 years.What are you talking about? UConn would forego media distributions for seven years. If Stanford and SMU are willing to do it to get into the club, why aren't we? This isn't the Big 12. This is the ACC- a league we have been trying to get into for years. A league with our former rivals (Syracuse, Pitt, BC, Louisville) + Tobacco Road. If we get a half share starting in 2031 and a full share in 2036, we would be foolish not to accept. We get less than 4.5 million per year from our TV deals. We can survive seven years of lost TV revenue with just the uptick in ticket sales alone. Put your pride at the door.