There is no doubt that there is sometimes a double standard, but at the same time Geno is one of those guys looking to find a slight when it's not always there. Not everything said about women's basketball has to be a referendum on the way the sport is covered...sometimes there are questions that deserve a legitimate response. Nobody complains about Tiger or Phelps or Serena or Bolt because they aren't manifestations of gulfs in talent between nations...they are merely individuals who happen to be generational athletes.
It isn't his fault nor UConn's fault. But it was bad for college basketball when UCLA was winning the championship every year in the men's game, it was bad - and still is, to some degree - for the sport of basketball on a world level when the U.S. was 70 points better than anybody else (though I admit I enjoyed it) and it is bad for college football when it is dominated by particular regions of the country. Athletes or even teams that dominate within confined periods of time can be great for a sport...dominance that endures in a way that seems institutionalized is probably not as good. It is one mans opinion but I don't think an unreasonable one.