“Calhoun’s Recruits” | The Boneyard

“Calhoun’s Recruits”

Joined
Dec 17, 2021
Messages
14
Reaction Score
112
Nobody needs my idiotic take but, like the rest of you, I still can’t get over it.

I’ve read quite a few posts lamenting that our expectations were too high for this group of players; 4/5 starters were mid-major level recruits and they simply had hard ceilings. All season long, though, I’ve been wondering what a Calhoun could have done with this group of kids. I honestly think he’d have won that last game by 20.

Remember that game in 2008 when UConn suspended Dyson/Wiggins and Calhoun took the severely depleted roster on the road to #8 Indiana and somehow got the W? Of course it’s not fair to compare anyone to Calhoun, but eking out wins like that are a large part of what makes a great coach.

I’m absolutely not defending Ollie, but anytime someone mention’s 2014, the most popular criticism is that he won it all with Calhoun’s recruits.

So my moronic unanswerable question is: Would Hurley have won with that 2014 roster? I really don’t think so. Dude probably would have started Brimah, Nolan and Olander together. (Joking, but you get my point)

I refuse to believe that this season was the best a strategic/reflective coach could have gotten out of these kids.

Anyway, it’s going to be a long off-season but we got this. We managed to stick it out after mind boggling losses to Tulsa in the AAC so this too shall pass. There’s still a lot to like about Hurley even if it is tough to see at the moment.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
3,677
Reaction Score
8,182
Comparing almost any coach in history to a guy who may be one of the 5 best is just ludicrous. We love St James. It’s in our dna to do so, but that is crazy pressure to out in anyone with less than 20 years HC experience. DH has a lot of learning to do and seems to be improving at the same rate if Andre Jackson. Either will be perfect or totally complete. JC was a true unicorn. Recruiting. Tactics. Prep. Motivation. If you get 2/4 today you have a very high level coach.
Also I appreciate the (good version of )Ollie support. No. No one else at that moment could have done what he did I with that team. He was highly motivated and young enough to connect. He had Durant and Westbrook and lebron and melo on speed dial. They played with purpose the year before. They told the world how hungry they were. He handled the bright lights cause he played under them. Epitome of a Calhoun minded nba guy. Nothing given.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
3,558
Reaction Score
20,362
LOL, lets criticize Hurley for hypothetically not being able to win it all with the 2014 team. Unfreaking real. This place is Looney Tunes.
What’s wild is how many hypothetical situations people throw out that have no impact on the future.

“In another universe Hurley would have (fill in the blank)….”
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
20,682
Reaction Score
49,577
Ollie was a Brimah and one away from losing to St Joes in round 1. The tournament is the worst mainstream way to judge the strength of a program, as much as we hate to admit it.
I don't fully agree. Some coaches have it in the post season and some don't. Rick Barnes is a perfect example. Dude cannot win when it counts. He's been coaching long enough that it's not random variation. The dude chokes.
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2020
Messages
420
Reaction Score
1,901
LOL, lets criticize Hurley for hypothetically not being able to win it all with the 2014 team. Unfreaking real. This place is Looney Tunes.
Critical of DH but OP is looney toons.

Edit: We both used looney tunes. Didn’t even notice at first. Cool.
 

Horatio

I played high school football
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
3,276
Reaction Score
12,160
Hurley probably hasn’t landed his best recruit yet. It’s still early. Plus, he had some hold overs from a rough stretch of recruiting. I’ll cut him some slack. That slack is good for two more seasons.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
4,527
Reaction Score
14,623
Ollie gets a really bad rap around here for what he did with what he was given. Got a title out of a depleted sanction restricted roster and tried his best to stick it out while being banished to the AAC.

Between a crazy amount of injuries, transfers, then recruiting (that started off well) taking a nosedive. It was a very unfortunate tenure from a prominent coach. Crazy how we finally joined the Big East after he left. Can’t take that 2014 title run from him though.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2019
Messages
200
Reaction Score
451
Ollie gets a really bad rap around here for what he did with what he was given. Got a title out of a depleted sanction restricted roster and tried his best to stick it out while being banished to the AAC.

Between a crazy amount of injuries, transfers, then recruiting (that started off well) taking a nosedive. It was a very unfortunate tenure from a prominent coach. Crazy how we finally joined the Big East after he left. Can’t take that 2014 title run from him though.

Was Ollie really "banished" to the American?

IMO, the American would've been just as good as the NBE if UConn would've performed.

Villanova performed up to par. UConn didn't. That was the difference.

Perhaps if UConn would've not had that entire recruiting class defect it may have been different; but - after the OBE split - it made absolutely no difference if UConn would've chosen either the FB group or the Catholic group.

The same issues that killed UConn's competitiveness in the AAC would've happened in the NBE too.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,952
Reaction Score
20,857
I wonder who would have coached Perno's recruits better in the 80's. Perno, Ollie or Hurley?

And why?

TIA
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,744
Reaction Score
7,813
Ollie was a Brimah and one away from losing to St Joes in round 1. The tournament is the worst mainstream way to judge the strength of a program, as much as we hate to admit it.
And DH was non competitive in his round 1 games
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,623
Reaction Score
98,863
What’s wild is how many hypothetical situations people throw out that have no impact on the future.

“In another universe Hurley would have (fill in the blank)….”
I wonder who would have coached Perno's recruits better in the 80's. Perno, Ollie or Hurley?

And why?

TIA


LOL, lets criticize Hurley for hypothetically not being able to win it all with the 2014 team. Unfreaking real. This place is Looney Tunes.


It's always a bit of looney tunes to try and compare how one coach would do in a different era with another coach's players.

OTOH at some point if you want to compare coaches against each other, you have to do some hypotheticals and "what if" scenarios.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
1,630
Reaction Score
3,232
Nate Miles. This year’s team was pretty tough but not tough enough. New Mexico State was tougher and better particularly Allen.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
4,527
Reaction Score
14,623
Was Ollie really "banished" to the American?

IMO, the American would've been just as good as the NBE if UConn would've performed.

Villanova performed up to par. UConn didn't. That was the difference.

Perhaps if UConn would've not had that entire recruiting class defect it may have been different; but - after the OBE split - it made absolutely no difference if UConn would've chosen either the FB group or the Catholic group.

The same issues that killed UConn's competitiveness in the AAC would've happened in the NBE too.
The American was a bad conference man. There’s a reason everyone was screaming to join the big East. Those Christmas break games against Houston were in front of nobody. Tournament games in Hartford and Memphis? It was hard selling to kids to play in that conference.

That exodus was crazy too. Never saw anything like it from kids who were getting PT. Combine that with AG being hurt every year and the other injury bugs and he couldn’t catch a break. It’s water under the bridge at this point. It’s kind of bizarre how we talk about a coach that has as many national championships as Syracuse though.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
2,470
Reaction Score
9,621
Nobody needs my idiotic take but, like the rest of you, I still can’t get over it.

I’ve read quite a few posts lamenting that our expectations were too high for this group of players; 4/5 starters were mid-major level recruits and they simply had hard ceilings. All season long, though, I’ve been wondering what a Calhoun could have done with this group of kids. I honestly think he’d have won that last game by 20.

Remember that game in 2008 when UConn suspended Dyson/Wiggins and Calhoun took the severely depleted roster on the road to #8 Indiana and somehow got the W? Of course it’s not fair to compare anyone to Calhoun, but eking out wins like that are a large part of what makes a great coach.

I’m absolutely not defending Ollie, but anytime someone mention’s 2014, the most popular criticism is that he won it all with Calhoun’s recruits.

So my moronic unanswerable question is: Would Hurley have won with that 2014 roster? I really don’t think so. Dude probably would have started Brimah, Nolan and Olander together. (Joking, but you get my point)

I refuse to believe that this season was the best a strategic/reflective coach could have gotten out of these kids.

Anyway, it’s going to be a long off-season but we got this. We managed to stick it out after mind boggling losses to Tulsa in the AAC so this too shall pass. There’s still a lot to like about Hurley even if it is tough to see at the moment.
See the numbers in the 'RSCI Top 100' column? You call the roster severely depleted, but it's actually massively more talented than this year's team even without Dyson and Wiggins.

1648037070695.png
 
Last edited:

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
11,961
Reaction Score
18,458
Was Ollie really "banished" to the American?

IMO, the American would've been just as good as the NBE if UConn would've performed.

Villanova performed up to par. UConn didn't. That was the difference.

Perhaps if UConn would've not had that entire recruiting class defect it may have been different; but - after the OBE split - it made absolutely no difference if UConn would've chosen either the FB group or the Catholic group.

The same issues that killed UConn's competitiveness in the AAC would've happened in the NBE too.
Completely disagree. The AAC (a mid-major conference) hurt our recruiting.
 

Inyatkin

Stairway to Seven
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
2,417
Reaction Score
9,340
KenPom last year under Ollie, 179. Georgetown this year, 182. It's a fair comparison.
As for the American, it was always decent at the top, but the bottom half absolutely ruined any chance of getting good computer numbers.
 

Online statistics

Members online
573
Guests online
3,131
Total visitors
3,704

Forum statistics

Threads
157,028
Messages
4,077,787
Members
9,972
Latest member
SeaDr


Top Bottom