- Joined
- Dec 6, 2016
- Messages
- 4,634
- Reaction Score
- 12,319
Absolutely not. It is clear he holds a grudge.Serious question...Does Emmert have a real life??
Absolutely not. It is clear he holds a grudge.Serious question...Does Emmert have a real life??
It is not persecution and saying so insults those who have had to deal with it and stating that is not being a , it is being truthful. Does anyone want to engage like an adult or just throw around personal attacks (because they literally don't have a proper retort)?
I am totally admitting and agreeing that this is a vendetta, it is unfair, it is a grudge. That is clear.
Ya, because a cat picture posted by a troll over and over has really persuaded me (so, that is not being obstinate). To be obstinate an attempt actually has to be made to properly persuade the person (which has not be done). But whatever man, whatever sob story you want to tell about our mens bball team, ya, feel free, they indeed have been "persecuted"! The team is bad enough, we don't need to make false claims, it is bad enough. I don't need to try and feel anything. I feel comfortable and confident in my intelligence. One who needs to insult another persons intelligence, however, hmm...Hey boss, from your post: "Persecution is the systematic mistreatment [of an] individual or group by another individual or group."
There's a pretty solid argument that it fits if you have any familiarity with the relationship between UConn basketball and the NCAA, and recognizing that reality doesn't "insult" Holocaust victims or whatever nonsense you're peddling. It's genuinely bizarre that you're being so obstinate, but I guess some people just need to try to feel smart.
Now just keep repeating that it's not persecution, which I guess is your well-reasoned rejoinder.
Ya, because a cat picture posted by a troll over and over has really persuaded me (so, that is not being obstinate). To be obstinate an attempt actually has to be made to properly persuade the person (which has not be done). But whatever man, whatever sob story you want to tell about our mens bball team, ya, feel free, they indeed have been "persecuted"! The team is bad enough, we don't need to make false claims, it is bad enough. I don't need to try and feel anything. I feel comfortable and confident in my intelligence. One who needs to insult another persons intelligence, however, hmm...
Oh cool, you do one of those fake translation things, because that has NEVER been done before, how unique... and yet you are the one who actually has nothing to say, the irony! Way to go!Translation: "I have nothing to say. I'm just a blowhard."
Good effort, bud. Solid showing.
If they were investigating because of Wilson would they really appeal the last denial? We know the investigation has been ongoing since the fall and they appealed after Christmas.
I am down to about zero respect for our Athletic Department but even I don’t think they could be quite that stupid.
If they were investigating because of Wilson would they really appeal the last denial? We know the investigation has been ongoing since the fall and they appealed after Christmas.
I am down to about zero respect for our Athletic Department but even I don’t think they could be quite that stupid.
Given that this is all purely hypothetical, IF our appeal set St. Johns off and caused them to retaliate, is that an off-the-wall reaction by them or something our athletics dept should have anticipated as a possibility?
The chance of our appeal being granted by the NCAA always seemed low, so not a lot of upside for taking on that risk.
At the same time, I think we owed it to Sid to at least make a run at it on his behalf, so I’m not sure there was really much of a choice for our athletics dept. We’re just completely snakebit.
he’s one of ours smh ...
Fair point. If Wilson is not one of the five recruits the NCAA is looking at, though, that would seem to put a hole in the St Johns “sour grapes” theory of where the initial NCAA complaint came from. . . .
A's and B's where they never wrote the one course paper which was the only requirement.We got punished for giving our players Fs. UNC gave their players As and Bs. So they were fine.
Have you ever heard of hyperboleOh cool, you do one of those fake translation things, because that has NEVER been done before, how unique... and yet you are the one who actually has nothing to say, the irony! Way to go!
So, prove to me how it is possible for a bball team to be persecuted. Because no one has done so yet. I have heard of religious groups, ethnic and racial persecution..but wow, a bball team! So, do tell! Really, do tell (and feel free to spare me the underhanded condescending stuff) because I am all ears..
It's interesting, but I really don't think UConn's name is being dragged through the mud all that much as a result of this.
I've been paying attention to people's responses on various platforms and, while there's some doofus' (cuse fans, obviously) that are like "duuuh UConn's dirty duuuh," most CBB fans' reaction to this have been to attack the NCAA for all the various issues they're facing at the moment.
Unless something major is found, I really don't think UConn's reputation will be tarnished all that much.
A's and B's where they never wrote the one course paper which was the only requirement.
If Emmert survives the MSU scandal AD Dave should hire away one of Emmert's underlings. Bring someone he likes into the athletic department. If you think this is a long standing vendetta against UConn then we should make it hard for him to continue to hate us. We have enough wasted salaries as it is in this incompetent athletic department, what's one more if it will give us some immunity moving forwards? play the game
How about Oregon 2 years ago w/ 3 players in the tourney which were identified in police reports of on-campus rape...teflon and top recruits.Could someone make a list of schools that had worse violations than us and say SMU/Tennessee but received little to no sanctions?
UNC - 20+ year Academic Scandal - Nothing
Louisville - Hookers, $ to recruits - self imposed ban/still waiting
Syracuse - failed drug tests, money to athletes from a local YMCA, talked with the NCAA to start violations after 2003
Michigan State - Sexual assault coverups - TBD
Baylor -
FSU -
Miami -
Kansas - every year there's something with several players
can't remember certain punishments for some of the schools
.There’s some connection there with Zach Brown tooThe St. John’s sour grapes theory to me is just people conflating the Wilson appeal timing with Jacobs’ article.
There’s some connection there with Zach Brown too
Touchè. I was one of the ones that started it lolIt started before anyone mentioned him.
Yes, I know what hyperbole is. And yes, I agree that Uconn is being singled out, or at least there are a handful of teams being treated less fairly than the majority. I am fairly certain Emmert has some kind of grudge against Uconn (for obvious reasons). Any way, that is where I stop.Have you ever heard of hyperbole
The use of persecution in this case would be the equivalent to saying I’m starving to death when you are hungry.
A team certainly can be singled out for punishment especially if it’s done for personal reasons like the APR ban.
The converse is also true the powers to be can turn their back on much more egregious deeds if they choose.
If your older than 16 and you haven’t learned these truths you are extremely lucky , innocent, or really dense.