- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 196
- Reaction Score
- 304
PAYNE was a BIG MAN, not as cut as YOUNG but still big. He couldn't establish a presence in the paint versus AB/PN, which was surprising how many times I thought he got away with a foul. He can def shoot from the outside, just like their 4, another big man who has a nice shot from outside.
Compare this to Young, who looks chiseled from a block of granite. What's his game outside of size and hustle? Is he as refined as MH from the Ville? Will we struggle in this guard penetrate backside clean up like we did versus the Cards? From the two times I have seen Young play, he doesn't have much of a touch from the outside, am I right?
Can our big boys treat him like they did Payne, shutting him down from the paint, keeping him off the boards, and if we do, should that be enough to win the game? To me, he is their biggest player, their catalyst, shut him out, and with our guard play, who else on their end can beat us? Not being arrogant, but wondering.
Your thoughts?
Compare this to Young, who looks chiseled from a block of granite. What's his game outside of size and hustle? Is he as refined as MH from the Ville? Will we struggle in this guard penetrate backside clean up like we did versus the Cards? From the two times I have seen Young play, he doesn't have much of a touch from the outside, am I right?
Can our big boys treat him like they did Payne, shutting him down from the paint, keeping him off the boards, and if we do, should that be enough to win the game? To me, he is their biggest player, their catalyst, shut him out, and with our guard play, who else on their end can beat us? Not being arrogant, but wondering.
Your thoughts?