- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,003
- Reaction Score
- 1,320
3 loses ugh?? To Yale was you counting that loss or did you have that game as a win??a loss to florida
a wtf loss
and a late season loss either in aac or ncaa tourney
I will resurrect this thread in April to say I told you so
3 loses ugh?? To Yale was you counting that loss or did you have that game as a win??
No I was counting on a one point win for UConn lolYes, was you counting that lose?
After the Yale loss, you are right on the money. Congrats!a loss to florida
a wtf loss
and a late season loss either in aac or ncaa tourney
I will resurrect this thread in April to say I told you so
Well you were half right in that we did hear it from you first...I was wrong
Well, I was way off in my prediction for the Huskies but was right about SMU doing nothing despite returning their veteran team. I said they'd have a successful regular season but do nothing in the NCAA's and got ripped for saying it. At least I have that. Misery loves company.
They did still throw the ball away to give them the chance for that call to be made and did have a chance to win right. They also allowed Alford to hit 8 or 9 threes or does that not count? I guess the goaltending call is the single reason they lost, huh?I mean, they got boned by an absurd application of the goaltending rule, but don't let that slow you down.
They did still throw the ball away to give them the chance for that call to be made and did have a chance to win right. They also allowed Alford to hit 8 or 9 threes or does that not count? I guess the goaltending call is the single reason they lost, huh?
They did still throw the ball away to give them the chance for that call to be made and did have a chance to win right. They also allowed Alford to hit 8 or 9 threes or does that not count? I guess the goaltending call is the single reason they lost, huh?
So I said they'd nothing in the NCAA Tourney. Do you consider winning one game in the NCAA Tourney 'something'? Maybe in SMU'S world that's a great season. Now they have no wins.So what's your point? That unless you play a perfect game, you deserve to lose? Nobody said SMU was perfect, but if the refs didn't just give 3 points to UCLA there, SMU wins the game, and your idiotic proclamation is proven wrong.