You heard it here first Uconn will have only 3 losses all year | Page 2 | The Boneyard

You heard it here first Uconn will have only 3 losses all year

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,002
Reaction Score
1,310
Nailed it

printcomp.aspx
 

joober jones

Finally Non-Fat Guy
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
4,737
Reaction Score
9,654
With the two losses we've already had, the 3 described by the OP would give us 5 on the season. If we somehow pull off a 3 loss season with 5 losses, he'll really be able to tell us to put it in our pipes and smoke it.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
471
Reaction Score
576
a loss to florida
a wtf loss
and a late season loss either in aac or ncaa tourney

I will resurrect this thread in April to say I told you so
3 loses ugh?? To Yale was you counting that loss or did you have that game as a win??
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,222
Reaction Score
4,547
a loss to florida
a wtf loss
and a late season loss either in aac or ncaa tourney

I will resurrect this thread in April to say I told you so
After the Yale loss, you are right on the money. Congrats!
 

Rico444

In the mix for six
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,732
Reaction Score
30,554
I don't know what everyone's so upset about; I'm pretty excited to know that we're now going to run the table en route to #5.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,054
Reaction Score
21,372
time to run the table baby
 

UCweCONN

Former Poster
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,875
Reaction Score
6,606
Well, I was way off in my prediction for the Huskies but was right about SMU doing nothing despite returning their veteran team. I said they'd have a successful regular season but do nothing in the NCAA's and got ripped for saying it. At least I have that. Misery loves company.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
5,292
Reaction Score
19,788
Well, I was way off in my prediction for the Huskies but was right about SMU doing nothing despite returning their veteran team. I said they'd have a successful regular season but do nothing in the NCAA's and got ripped for saying it. At least I have that. Misery loves company.

I mean, they got boned by an absurd application of the goaltending rule, but don't let that slow you down.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,149
Reaction Score
8,314
In the OP's defense I take the crown for worst prediction of the season. I said we had a 50-50 chance to repeat. Whoops.
 

UCweCONN

Former Poster
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,875
Reaction Score
6,606
I mean, they got boned by an absurd application of the goaltending rule, but don't let that slow you down.
They did still throw the ball away to give them the chance for that call to be made and did have a chance to win right. They also allowed Alford to hit 8 or 9 threes or does that not count? I guess the goaltending call is the single reason they lost, huh?
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
5,292
Reaction Score
19,788
They did still throw the ball away to give them the chance for that call to be made and did have a chance to win right. They also allowed Alford to hit 8 or 9 threes or does that not count? I guess the goaltending call is the single reason they lost, huh?

So what's your point? That unless you play a perfect game, you deserve to lose? Nobody said SMU was perfect, but if the refs didn't just give 3 points to UCLA there, SMU wins the game, and your idiotic proclamation is proven wrong.
 

Stainmaster

Occasionally Constructive
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22,004
Reaction Score
41,499
They did still throw the ball away to give them the chance for that call to be made and did have a chance to win right. They also allowed Alford to hit 8 or 9 threes or does that not count? I guess the goaltending call is the single reason they lost, huh?

"Allowed" Alford?

Maybe Alford is nearly a 40% 3PT shooter? Maybe teams face good players who shoot well? Nice job brazenly defending your prediction, but Alford's shooting performance wasn't solely a function of bad defense. As much as I'll get slapped around for admitting this about a UCLA player, he's good.
 

UCweCONN

Former Poster
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,875
Reaction Score
6,606
So what's your point? That unless you play a perfect game, you deserve to lose? Nobody said SMU was perfect, but if the refs didn't just give 3 points to UCLA there, SMU wins the game, and your idiotic proclamation is proven wrong.
So I said they'd nothing in the NCAA Tourney. Do you consider winning one game in the NCAA Tourney 'something'? Maybe in SMU'S world that's a great season. Now they have no wins.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
336
Guests online
2,098
Total visitors
2,434

Forum statistics

Threads
157,651
Messages
4,117,298
Members
10,008
Latest member
macklin


Top Bottom