You guys have gone off the deep end!

[metsfan2323]

Or it could be that the opponents let UConn players take what "should" be good shots because UConn plays guys who can't shoot. For a lot of UConn players the old adage "there is a reason you are open" is unfortunately true.

Well we're in the top 5 of that stat, knock it if you want I think it's a result of good coaching. The teams ranked ahead of us are all terrific.

 

[the Q]

This isn’t wrong, but it’s also primarily evidence of teams not getting anything at the rim against us.

Whaley is a god lol

The problem is teams are scorching hot on corner 3s

 

[jdb50]

Until the former point guard recruits great shooting guards and more than one at a time we are going nowhere. And I am not talking just shooting guards but players that have an excellent handle.

 

[Klipper]

If you love Hurley, that's fine...with the players he has he should have won 20 plus games...taken the team to a spot in March Madness. But don't expect him to win in the NCAA's when you are eight men deep at most and rarely can put two players on the court that can put the ball in the basket. You know why they led the Big East in offensive rebounding? Because they miss so many shots! Forget about height get some kids that can score!

 

[metsfan2323]

Forget about height get some kids that can score!

I think you see this change already in his most recent recruits all of whom are noted shooters/scorers. Better shooting is on the way.

Hawkins has great shooting form, Karaban looks like a shooter, the word on the street is that Floyd can shoot, Clingan is a gifter scorer, and Castle looks like a terrific offensive weapon. Is the fanbase going to be patient enough for this new wave of players or do we want to run Hurley out of town? I hope we show some patience.

and BTW Hurley has already put a terrific offensive player into the NBA but it didn't help us last year because of the elbow injury/surgery.

 

[giddyup]

I could've simply just "liked" your post, but I had to reply. This is the best, most rational, logical assessment I've heard yet. Can the mods somehow put a pin in this post alone? So we can refer to it all summer. @OkaForPrez you're the voice of a generation.

Back to back one and done with supposedly talent laden squads hardened by a supposedly super basketball conference is bull crap. Hurley could have top 10 recruits at every position and he’d run them into the ground. Great recruiter, big mouth with nothing behind it.

 

[Jaydumo20]

I understand your frustration. I for one never thought that this team was talent laden, though. Did you?

Back to back one and done with supposedly talent laden squads hardened by a supposedly super basketball conference is bull crap. Hurley could have top 10 recruits at every position and he’d run them into the ground. Great recruiter, big mouth with nothing behind it.

Isaiah whaley became a legit player under Hurley. His growth was tangible. Also, you don't think Cole and Tyrese benefited from playing under Hurley? I don't think he ran them into the ground. He actually increased their stock 10fold

 

[USNavyDog]

Hurley isn't hurting anything by referring back to struggles of the program and where it is right now getting better. I think he got misquoted by the New London Day. He's drawing a comparison to show how much this program has healing and grown out of a tough situation and its not a knock against Ollie. Hurley has been awesome.

Despite what happened to Kevin Ollie, I'm glad he's doing well after what happened. I'll always remember Ollie keeping the team positive during that 2012/13 season of no post season eligibility and still guiding that team to a 20 win season and ending on a high note when Ryan Boatright swished that shot against Providence at the Gampel Pavilion. Also, he won Uconn that 4th title a year later in 2013/14 with Shabazz, Boatright and co.

 

[UCSouth]

Back to back one and done with supposedly talent laden squads hardened by a supposedly super basketball conference is bull crap. Hurley could have top 10 recruits at every position and he’d run them into the ground. Great recruiter, big mouth with nothing behind it.

Give it up. You're BS is quickly becoming tiresome.

 

[KingAG]

Hurley isn't hurting anything by referring back to struggles of the program and where it is right now getting better. I think he got misquoted by the New London Day. He's drawing a comparison to show how much this program has healing and grown out of a tough situation and its not a knock against Ollie. Hurley has been awesome.

Despite what happened to Kevin Ollie, I'm glad he's doing well after what happened. I'll always remember Ollie keeping the team positive during that 2012/13 season of no post season eligibility and still guiding that team to a 20 win season and ending on a high note when Ryan Boatright swished that shot against Providence at the Gampel Pavilion. Also, he won Uconn that 4th title a year later in 2013/14 with Shabazz, Boatright and co.

Hurley has never said a disparaging word about Ollie. The whole thread was a reach.

 

[willie99]

I wonder how many of the Hurley Haters thought Calhoun couldn't win the big one in the 90's?

Probably at least 75%

This team had serious deficiencies on the offensive side of the ball. And I'm talking talent wise, everyone lacked something. The closest thing we have to well rounded NBA potential player was Hawkins, who missed the post season.

The team played hard, played defense and rebounded. I loved watching these son of a b's fight.

My only problem with Hurley is that he didn't do enough with the freshman. Although that was a nationwide epidemic this year.

More talent is on the way

THANK YOU DAN HURLEY

 

[willie99]

And jrazz12, the biggest Karen on this board, does his thing

Clown

He dislikes everyone who's not as angry and hate filled as he is

Caio child

 

[GotNets?]

Here’s my problem with the expectations people have. They are largely based on an extremely rare historical precedent in terms of outperforming expectations in the tourney.

UConn’s last regular season dominant team was 2009.

Our sweet spot window was about 10-15 years.

We were extremely blessed to win in ‘11 and ‘14 with teams that were capable surely, but not expected to win. In fact ‘14 almost died in the cradle.

Hurley has us back to that ‘11 & ‘14 level already without the miracle runs.

Those who believe we should be back at the 00’s think we deserve hall of fame level coaching and program building performance.

What programs performance as a benchmark would make people satisfied with Hurley right now?

Gonzaga? Still haven’t won the big one. Kentucky? Just got bounced a community college from Jersey. What’s the comp standard?

Nobody is satisfied with back to back first round exits but it’s not an endictment.

And for the Hurley is easy to prepare for crowd, what he does has us in the top 5 of net good shots vs our opponents.

Is there a better coaching statistic normalized for player performance than that?

In terms of good comps, would any of these suffice?

Cronin at UCLA
Musselman at Arkansas
Juwan Howard at Michigan
HDavis at UNC

These are all schools with titles or final 4 experience and serious hoops pedigree with a relatively new coach in a strong conference. If they can do it at their schools, then we should be able to do it too.

Instead, I think Hurley is more like these names… all of which are saying goodbye:
Shaka at Texas
White at Florida
Keatts at NC State
… or whoever’s halfway decent at some school that’s sniffed success before.

I like that stat though changing tack.

 

[KingAG]

In terms of good comps, would any of these suffice?

Cronin at UCLA
Musselman at Arkansas
Juwan Howard at Michigan
HDavis at UNC

These are all schools with titles or final 4 experience and serious hoops pedigree with a relatively new coach in a strong conference. If they can do it at their schools, then we should be able to do it too.

Instead, I think Hurley is more like these names… all of which are saying goodbye:
Shaka at Texas
White at Florida
Keatts at NC State
… or whoever’s halfway decent at some school that’s sniffed success before.

I like that stat though changing tack.

All of the coaches in the first tier inherited programs already in a power conference and their programs were much better of than UConn when Hurley got here

 

[UncleSpliff]

I’d like to know for some of the people here how long are you willing to give Hurley the benefit of the doubt without actually winning a single NCAA tournament game. What if this happens next year? We get bounced in the first round as a higher seed or don’t even make the tournament for the 3rd straight year ? How long are you going to use the excuse about the state of the program when Hurley took over? In year 5 of a rebuild there are NO more excuses. I haven’t seen anything from Hurley at this point that leads me to believe that he can take us back to being a contender. I hope I’m proven wrong but I just don’t see it. If this happens again next year we really need to evaluate the state of the program. I’d like to think we can find a coach for 3 mm per year that can win a single ncaa tournament game.

 

[GotNets?]

All of the coaches in the first tier inherited programs already in a power conference and their programs were much better of than UConn when Hurley got here

That’s fair — or at least people can agree to disagree because it’s circular logic otherwise. It’s hard to find comps for this kind of thing.

The point that I’m trying to make is that UConn has a unique legacy similar to some of the blue bloods. Maybe Indiana winning a play in game in year one would be a better comp (just thought of that one). Hurleys not building this from scratch without any resources though. If he’s not getting it done after four years, he’ll have more shots, but those two losses were so god awful that it’s eviscerating his credibility for the future. If he wants to give it the old college try, he has to start by winning a game.

Handicapping for this years debacle, he probably needs to go to the second weekend to make up for the fact he didn’t win one this year.

This is the kind of steady progress pattern that some people expect to see from Hurley I think. It’s more realistic than those comps I gave before like Cronin or Hubert Davis, but we’ll see….

Year 3: in the tournament
Year 4: win a game
Year 5: win two games
Year 6: elite 8?

We’ll see…..

 

[jrazz12]

Oh little @willie99 you're breaking my heart.

I throw around likes and dislikes at will because it's quicker and easier than engaging on every subject. And because it doesn't mean anything. But clearly it upsets your snowflake feelings, calling me out without tagging me and then running behind the block button and misspelling the word "ciao".

For the record, I didn't like you trashing our players in favor of the guy making $3 million a year who's supposed to be giving them the best chance to succeed. But go on, cry more.

 

[willie99]

In terms of good comps, would any of these suffice?

Cronin at UCLA
Musselman at Arkansas
Juwan Howard at Michigan
HDavis at UNC

These are all schools with titles or final 4 experience and serious hoops pedigree with a relatively new coach in a strong conference. If they can do it at their schools, then we should be able to do it too.

Instead, I think Hurley is more like these names… all of which are saying goodbye:
Shaka at Texas
White at Florida
Keatts at NC State
… or whoever’s halfway decent at some school that’s sniffed success before.

I like that stat though changing tack.

My analogy would be very different. I say the Hurley Haters remind me of

Cronin at Cincinnati
Dixon at Pittsburgh
Barnes at Texas

Where successful coaches were run out of town by people who didn't what they had

I find the hate for Hurley appalling, mind-blowing, unfathomable.... some combination thereof

PS: And I think we need to remember that we were playing great at the end of year two. The only reason he may not have won a post season game that year was because there were no post season games played that year

 

[Doctor Hoop]

Isaiah whaley became a legit player under Hurley. His growth was tangible.

Yes, but not sure if you recall him riding the pine until late in the season soph year, then finally getting a few minutes here and there until it became obvious that his motor and defense were indispensable. All at a time that a lot of ‘yarders wanted him run off.

You have to have vision for your players‘ capabilitit’s, sometimes changing how you play if those capabilities don’t match. (Ahem … stopping penetration by 1 player … cough)

 

[OkaForPrez]

I’d like to know for some of the people here how long are you willing to give Hurley the benefit of the doubt without actually winning a single NCAA tournament game. What if this happens next year? We get bounced in the first round as a higher seed or don’t even make the tournament for the 3rd straight year ? How long are you going to use the excuse about the state of the program when Hurley took over? In year 5 of a rebuild there are NO more excuses. I haven’t seen anything from Hurley at this point that leads me to believe that he can take us back to being a contender. I hope I’m proven wrong but I just don’t see it. If this happens again next year we really need to evaluate the state of the program. I’d like to think we can find a coach for 3 mm per year that can win a single ncaa tournament game.

I think for me the seat would get warm if we missed the tournament two years in a row. That’s my standard. Calhoun never did and I don’t expect top tier programs to. I expect to go to the tourney 3/4 or 4/5 years. I expect a sweet 16 or better run once in that cycle.

Once you’re in I work under the assumption that anything can happen.

It’s equally irrational to credit Mick Cronin with Johnny Juzang going off last year as it is to penalize Hurley for Teddy Allen.

I don’t disagree that there’s some questions raised about Hurley’s improv skills. But I’m willing to be patient and let him develop assuming the above is true.

 

[djct1999]

Here’s my problem with the expectations people have. They are largely based on an extremely rare historical precedent in terms of outperforming expectations in the tourney.

UConn’s last regular season dominant team was 2009.

Our sweet spot window was about 10-15 years.

We were extremely blessed to win in ‘11 and ‘14 with teams that were capable surely, but not expected to win. In fact ‘14 almost died in the cradle.

Hurley has us back to that ‘11 & ‘14 level already without the miracle runs.

Those who believe we should be back at the 00’s think we deserve hall of fame level coaching and program building performance.

What programs performance as a benchmark would make people satisfied with Hurley right now?

Gonzaga? Still haven’t won the big one. Kentucky? Just got bounced a community college from Jersey. What’s the comp standard?

Nobody is satisfied with back to back first round exits but it’s not an endictment.

And for the Hurley is easy to prepare for crowd, what he does has us in the top 5 of net good shots vs our opponents.

Is there a better coaching statistic normalized for player performance than that?

On top of that, he and Kimani(in the Midwest)were back at work. Showing up for Donovan’s state final game in support. That’s why players love him. This isn’t for show. Dan Hurley does it with sincerity and passion.

 

[jibsey]

On top of that, he and Kimani(in the Midwest)were back at work. Showing up for Donovan’s state final game in support. That’s why players love him. This isn’t for show. Dan Hurley does it with sincerity and passion.

Hurley is a worker and a recruiter so let’s just take a deep breath and relax a bit. This thing is going to work out. Just plug the holes we have on offense with new talent. That’s the whole deal right there, it’s not bad coaching. One of my friends tried to tell me that it was New Mexico State’s coach that was the difference the other night. Teddy Allen was coached up to 37 points and then in the next game he was coached down to 12 points?

 

[Kathy]

Hurley is a worker and a recruiter so let’s just take a deep breath and relax a bit. This thing is going to work out. Just plug the holes we have on offense with new talent. That’s the whole deal right there, it’s not bad coaching. One of my friends tried to tell me that it was New Mexico State’s coach that was the difference the other night. Teddy Allen was coached up to 37 points and then in the next game he was coached down to 12 points?

He's right- it was coaching, but not Jans.

 

[Jaydumo20]

Hurley is a worker and a recruiter so let’s just take a deep breath and relax a bit. This thing is going to work out. Just plug the holes we have on offense with new talent. That’s the whole deal right there, it’s not bad coaching. One of my friends tried to tell me that it was New Mexico State’s coach that was the difference the other night. Teddy Allen was coached up to 37 points and then in the next game he was coached down to 12 points?

People are gonna say that Arkansas coaching on defense is what shut him down. Something Hurley couldn't do. But they couldn't stop Allen coming up clutch last night and I wouldn't exactly say that Arkansas figured them out. Foul shots decided this one.

 

[Jaydumo20]

He's right- it was coaching, but not Jans.

I knew this was coming. The analysts said after the 1st half of last night's game that it was the worst 1st half of basketball they'd seen in a long time, by both teams. The 2nd half was brutal too. Musselman didn't exactly coach a beauty. To eke out a win on FT's was probably not EM's plan.

They did a better job on Allen and played a closer game than us, but let's not act like Musselman is COY after that.

 

[UCSouth]

Oh little @willie99 you're breaking my heart.

I throw around likes and dislikes at will because it's quicker and easier than engaging on every subject. And because it doesn't mean anything. But clearly it upsets your snowflake feelings, calling me out without tagging me and then running behind the block button and misspelling the word "ciao".

For the record, I didn't like you trashing our players in favor of the guy making $3 million a year who's supposed to be giving them the best chance to succeed. But go on, cry more.

How old are you? Serious question.

 

[Kathy]

I knew this was coming. The analysts said after the 1st half of last night's game that it was the worst 1st half of basketball they'd seen in a long time, by both teams. The 2nd half was brutal too. Musselman didn't exactly coach a beauty. To eke out a win on FT's was probably not EM's plan.

They did a better job on Allen and played a closer game than us, but let's not act like Musselman is COY after that.

Never said COY but you said it - they did a better job on Allen.

 

[Dooch]

The reason we lost to NM St had more to do with them hitting 65% on 3s and less about Allen even with his 37 points. Against Ark they shot around 23% on 3s, which is much closer to their season average.

 

[ucp990411]

and we didn't have the real Bouknight last year vs Maryland just a close facsimile of him.

Based on what he’s done this year maybe that was the real Bouknight.

 

[Matrim55]

I’d like to know for some of the people here how long are you willing to give Hurley the benefit of the doubt without actually winning a single NCAA tournament game.

Two more years.

I actually expect us to take a step backwards next year, then a big step forward in '23-24. If we're not a Sweet 16 team that year, then he's on the hot seat for 24-25.