- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 9,051
- Reaction Score
- 39,134
he wasn't coming anyway. This was a "it's not you it's me comment, made up after the fact, likely by his managers. No sense ticking Ollie off and if they can help him out, he might help them some time in the future. An 18 year old kid doesn't make decisions based on the coach's contract.
Quite possibly the most ill-informed thing you've ever posted. And that's saying something.An 18 year old kid doesn't make decisions based on the coach's contract.
An 18 year old kid doesn't make decisions based on the coach's contract.
he wasn't coming anyway. This was a "it's not you it's me comment, made up after the fact, likely by his managers. No sense ticking Ollie off and if they can help him out, he might help them some time in the future. An 18 year old kid doesn't make decisions based on the coach's contract.
The squid could say I have a one year deal so I'll be here for your whole career.Most coaches these days try to work the scam where they have a permanent five-year deal that just rolls over automatically at the end of each year. That way, they can walk into a recruit's house and say "I have a five-year deal so you know I'll be here your whole career." The by-product is it makes it very hard to buy them out if they're not getting it done.
Somehow Hathaway worked that same scam for his own deal, which indicates we had some serious idiots in high places.
Sent from my BlackBerry 9930 using Tapatalk
he wasn't coming anyway. This was a "it's not you it's me comment, made up after the fact, likely by his managers. No sense ticking Ollie off and if they can help him out, he might help them some time in the future. An 18 year old kid doesn't make decisions based on the coach's contract.
he wasn't coming anyway. This was a "it's not you it's me comment, made up after the fact, likely by his managers. No sense ticking Ollie off and if they can help him out, he might help them some time in the future. An 18 year old kid doesn't make decisions based on the coach's contract.
Daniels essentially says its a minor annoyance, but you guys want to use it as an excuse. The myth of Ollie as the great recruiter has yet to be proven, so its nice to have a reason to fall back on when the myth proves itself to be untrue. Historically, UConn rarely had a top recruiting class under Calhoun. They often landed less heralded guys and Calhoun coached them up, especially in the front court. Facey and Samuels are classic Calhoun recruits, I think. Ok but not exactly can't miss type players. We'll see what Ollie does with those same kind of players.
And you do exactly the same thing by ignoring the comments that it has limited impact. Human nature I guess.And Daniels also says that Ollie is actually a very good recruiter. But as usual, you pick and choose whatever fits the argument that you want to make.
Daniels essentially says its a minor annoyance, but you guys want to use it as an excuse. The myth of Ollie as the great recruiter has yet to be proven, so its nice to have a reason to fall back on when the myth proves itself to be untrue. Historically, UConn rarely had a top recruiting class under Calhoun. They often landed less heralded guys and Calhoun coached them up, especially in the front court. Facey and Samuels are classic Calhoun recruits, I think. Ok but not exactly can't miss type players. We'll see what Ollie does with those same kind of players.
Fair enough. He was very good at recognizing talent that others missed in particular.Yes and no. Calhoun built his teams mainly with the first four types of players:
He also usually had 1-2 down years while building those players up to FF/NC teams, it was almost like clockwork until Dyson got injured and Kemba exploded. He also had two high school All-American level kids on those NC teams.
- Criminally underrated recruits (Examples: Okafor/Gordon/Allen/Lamb)
- Guys with potential who he coached up (Examples: Armstrong/Knight/Thabeet)
- Athletes (Examples: Stanley/Dyson/Robertson)
- High school All American type (El-Amin/Hamilton, Charlie/Taliek, Walker/Oriakhi, Rudy)
- Overseas guys (Dove/Sheffer/Giffey)
Yes and no. Calhoun built his teams mainly with the first four types of players:
He also usually had 1-2 down years while building those players up to FF/NC teams, it was almost like clockwork until Dyson got injured and Kemba exploded. He also had two high school All-American level kids on those NC teams.
- Criminally underrated recruits (Examples: Okafor/Gordon/Allen/Lamb)
- Guys with potential who he coached up (Examples: Armstrong/Knight/Thabeet)
- Athletes (Examples: Stanley/Dyson/Robertson)
- High school All American type (El-Amin/Hamilton, Charlie/Taliek, Walker/Oriakhi, Rudy)
- Overseas guys (Dove/Sheffer/Giffey)
But Facey and Samuels are like the Edwards and Austrie on a team that also featured blue-chip recruits (AJ, Dyson, Sticks).
Yes, JC has made a living off of developing unheralded players. But those unheralded players were also complemented by a lot of highly-rated guys who lived up to the hype.
Daniels essentially says its a minor annoyance, but you guys want to use it as an excuse. The myth of Ollie as the great recruiter has yet to be proven, so its nice to have a reason to fall back on when the myth proves itself to be untrue. Historically, UConn rarely had a top recruiting class under Calhoun. They often landed less heralded guys and Calhoun coached them up, especially in the front court. Facey and Samuels are classic Calhoun recruits, I think. Ok but not exactly can't miss type players. We'll see what Ollie does with those same kind of players.
You have absolutely no idea whether he was coming or not.he wasn't coming anyway. This was a "it's not you it's me comment, made up after the fact, likely by his managers. No sense ticking Ollie off and if they can help him out, he might help them some time in the future. An 18 year old kid doesn't make decisions based on the coach's contract.