Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="ClifSpliffy, post: 3371005, member: 9260"]
1960s 'model cities' program. big gov run amok. I suppose that the explosion in cars, planes,[I] [/I]colour television, Apollo, and the like was partly responsible for many folks to support tearing the past down, and building  more entrance ramps to the future, but it was a  bad idea. to their credit, there  were plenty who said 'don't do this.' the big dig, albeit corrupt, signaled the beginning to the end of the 'model cities' mistake. today, all of connecticut's cities are looking better than they have in a long, long time. housing and people, are, and will continue to be, finding  their way back. [I]Connecticut local train travel is mostly awesome, [/I]and it too, is finding its way back.   there is a new land metric, along the lines of 'urban,' 'rural,' 'suburban,' 'exurban,' and such, that describes areas where, so to speak, a few minutes going one way puts you at saks fifth avenue, 5 guys, or acme corp, while a few minutes the other way puts you in touch with jaws, or bullwinkle, or silence. connecticut has the highest percent of any state with land so identified, [I]a very good way to live. [/I] all that is needed is to rightsize the government/tax  thing.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach