Xavier pausing activities

[DayDayTFS]

Yeah, but still a very irresponsible act and with a neck gaiter. Ugh he surely had no concern for others.

How would you know if he cares? They were there drinking already, he helped them out. Typical America... everyone thinks they know best.

 

[superjohn]

Yeah, but still a very irresponsible act and with a neck gaiter. Ugh he surely had no concern for others.

He had concern for a local business, the people who work there, and fans of Xavier basketball.

 

[UConn_Top_Dog]

He had concern for a local business, the people who work there, and fans of Xavier basketball.

I guess he has more concern for them than his own players.

 

[7774]

He had concern for a local business, the people who work there, and fans of Xavier basketball.

Pretty sure he could have just called the bar, given them his credit card number, and told them to cut it off at $2K.

 

[superjohn]

Pretty sure he could have just called the bar, given them his credit card number, and told them to cut it off at $2K.

That would have been better.

 

[Scoe]

Good intentions bad judgement. Probably shouldve paid over the phone and been on a live video with a message to the fans.

 

[BParkDog]

We have a Constitution with a Bill of Rights. There will be no anti-speech bill. The standard cannot be superseded by a legislature. And if it is "within 2 years", the Supreme Court is +3 conservative at the moment. You can rest easy. I will gladly take the over on that bet. The Harper's Letter again had nothing to do with free speech. There is a reason it did not include the phrase within.

Actually, I love this interaction, between us. Maybe we should take it to private, so as not to rankle.
My under/over was for a law being passed - not for a SCOTUS review.

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are just suggestions - they are not binding. They are not immutable. They mean only what 5 people say they mean. Nothing more, nothing less. If 5 people say "Free Speech" does not include "hate" speech, then that's that.

If you want the 2 year U/O on the legislation being enacted, name your wager. I'll take the under.

If you want an U/O on the legislation withstanding SCOTUS review, then I need to see what happens with POTUS and the Senate in 2 months.

 

[7774]

That would have been better.

Yeah, he could have gotten cash back

 

[Edward Sargent]

Pretty sure he could have just called the bar, given them his credit card number, and told them to cut it off at $2K.

I think you are right, nothing he did was meant to be malicious, but with this pandemic less contact is more!

 

[RichZ]

In some states it was more important to keep the bars open than the schools!

Well, remote drinking is kind of like being an alchoholic, isn't it?

 

[DayDayTFS]

opinions are like... we all got one