Exit 4
This space for rent
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2012
- Messages
- 10,611
- Reaction Score
- 39,701
^^^^^^thisThat said, naming the individuals as defendants was dumb.
^^^^^^thisThat said, naming the individuals as defendants was dumb.
That 5-3 vote to add Penn St in 1982 was 1 vote short (needed to be 6-2). That would have changed everything, none of the football schools would have ever left.Uconn ststus as a red headed stepchild misfit outsider in intercollegiate athletics, perpetually perched on the edge of downfall, began in earnest 35 years ago. The schools basketball programs managed to be included in Gavitt's vision of an urban private school basketball league. Then in 82-83, Penn State wanted in and was excluded by 5-3 vote.
The rest is history of repitition of failure and poor leadership by multiple iterations of state elected and appointed leaders at university and state level.
Multiple opportunities to find a meaningful home for athletics failed. John Rowland and Lew Perkins made it last as long as it did by the driving through1-AA upgrade.
From coaches to adminustrators to politicians, multiple iterstions of hubris, arrogance and ignorance alienated everyone that could help vote for UConn.
In thr game of survivor, we made it to the final round andthe jury selected somebody else,because we alienated everyone.
If you go back in time, convince people to listen to Lew Perkins and others a lot earlier than they did - we waited too long to make the move.
Keep telling yourself that. maybe someday it will be true.
After all is said and done, that's how I feel.I have had so much fun at the UCONN games, it is definitely worth it.
My only regret is that we waited waaaaay too long to upgrade football. That is consistent with how Connecticut does things - hem and haw over something only to make a rushed bad decision at the very last minute, then complain about the eventual negative fallout. If we had upgraded in the 80s...even the early 90s...I really believe we would be in the ACC right now. Better yet, there is a chance the old Big East (the REAL Big East) would still be in existence and a member of a true Power-6 structure. We would have competed against Boston College, Miami, and Virginia Tech for 10 years before their eventual split. That's plenty of time to develop strong partnerships. Of course, we would have needed an invite from the Big East to upgrade. It's my understanding - and I may be wrong - that we had one of those "if you upgrade, you will have a place to play" agreements similar to our Hockey East upgrade.
Our upgrade took way too long and the stadium our state finally relented to bond out was a cheap and quick construction just to get something built. The Rent became outdated in less than 5 months after it opened, offers zero on-campus flair that the majority of FBS stadiums offer, and any attempt to renovate or expand it was met with the same ridiculous "season ticket sellouts" response from our inept AD.
Best of all, we're doing the same exact thing with the new hockey venue. Somebody please wake up Albert Einstein and march him to UConn's front door to, once again, define insanity for our inept AD.
Aside: not entering that Notre Dame series was a stupid opinion back then and looks incredibly stupid now. That series slapped the entitled label on us and rightfully so. New kid on the block UConn tried to dictate decade long terms to Notre Dame. Connecticut politicians are a special kind of stupid.
The lawsuit was a necessary step in the short term. BC's resistance in 2010-11 was based on fear of competition, not revenge. That said, naming the individuals as defendants was dumb.
I have had so much fun at the UCONN games, it is definitely worth it.
That 5-3 vote to add Penn St in 1982 was 1 vote short (needed to be 6-2). That would have changed everything, none of the football schools would have ever left.
St Johns, Villanova. and Georgetown were afraid of football, and responsible for the end of the Big East.That 5-3 vote to add Penn St in 1982 was 1 vote short (needed to be 6-2). That would have changed everything, none of the football schools would have ever left.
This would make sense if other parties to that lawsuit weren’t extended invites...but they were.
Your political dislike of certain people isn’t license to rewrite history.
The lawsuit had to be done. We wouldn't have gotten as close as we did without it.
And many of you continue to delude yourself if you really believe that ACC members held it against us and not Pitt. You're assuming that university presidents are as easily manipulated by social media discussion as you are.
Don't we have a department focused on time travel?phase 1 - build time machine
phase 2 - add Penn St.
phase 3 - .... ??
phase 4 - profit
Can we ban Villanova fans from here? Other two schools barely have fans left.St Johns, Villanova. and Georgetown were afraid of football, and responsible for the end of the Big East.
We were 2-3 years too late on the upgrade. I think if UConn had upgraded in 1995 or 1996, the ACC raid would have worked out very differently.
The Big East breakup worked out well for all but 3 schools: UConn, Cincinnati and USF. There were definitely some tactical moves UConn should have made along the way, like not hiring Pasqualoni. UConn's 2009 team was its strongest, and lost a bunch of close games. That team could have easily gone 11-1 and made a major bowl, and that may have changed a lot of things too.
We will also be too late in cutting football loose. It is destroying our basketball programs in the AAC.