The problem is that TO, EW and Nolan are all foul prone. And Nolan still hasn't figured the game out. So KO needs TO and EW at the five, DD and NG at the four, RJ and OC at the 2-3, SN 1-2 and RB at the 1. The problems wasn't with KO's subbing. The problem is lack of depth and guys who are average players getting into foul trouble.
Put that line up in and 8 minutes after the game starts TO and EW have 2 fouls apiece and then what. Nolan? Yikes. KO needs ten fouls from EW and TO to cover the five.....maybe down the stretch it's worth experimenting with Bazz, Boat, DD, TO, and Wolfe. I'd be curious to see how they respond at their natural positions.
Agree about the foul trouble problem. I was referring more towards the end of the game where hopefully they have some fouls to give but might be more comfortable with the offense because of their roles.Put that line up in and 8 minutes after the game starts TO and EW have 2 fouls apiece and then what. Nolan? Yikes. KO needs ten fouls from EW and TO to cover the five.
Problem with DD at the 3 is that he would then his ball handling deficiencies become more exposed and we would see more turnovers. At the 4, he has a quickness advantage and when hitting has the ability to stretch the defense. He would also struggle to stay in front of most opposing 3s but his long arms and good timing in shot blocking help him at the 4.....maybe down the stretch it's worth experimenting with Bazz, Boat, DD, TO, and Wolfe. I'd be curious to see how they respond at their natural positions.
At the end of games with neither in foul trouble I believe its worth exploring.Agree about the foul trouble problem. I was referring more towards the end of the game where hopefully they have some fouls to give but might be more comfortable with the offense because of their roles.