Sam Prahalis? You mean the person that 80% of this board said would be a terrible terrible pick?
She did. I was impressed by how hard she played her senior year too.Glory had a really nice rookie year.
And the same one that some people including Cam have already recognized is not likely to be a PG to lead a team to the title.Sam Prahalis? You mean the person that 80% of this board said would be a terrible terrible pick?
Congrats to Tiff!
Sam Prahalis? You mean the person that 80% of this board said would be a terrible terrible pick?
Glory had a really nice rookie year.
she has always played like that. That great athletic ability. I think she did play good against the Sparks.Glory was impressive - she is the energizer bunny in a hyper-athletic 6'3" frame. Her offensive output was impressive for a rook and her hustle on the boards was there as always.
How did she do against Nneka? Did they match up against each other when the Shock played the Sparks or did she have to guard Candace ?
She will be around the W for a long time.
Sam looked lost playing against UCONN...and that's something for Saniya to think about...if someone with that much talent could be completely neutralized by a college team...imagine how much better she could be now if she'd had the benefit of that program...
Sam looked lost playing against UCONN...and that's something for Saniya to think about...if someone with that much talent could be completely neutralized by a college team...imagine how much better she could be now if she'd had the benefit of that program...
(1) It's often easier to neutralize a player in college because she has teammates who are weak links. That is much less likely in the pros.
(2) You have no idea how she would've done with Geno. Not every player is right for him. And he might not have wanted her anyway.
(3) She landed on the all-rookie team; I think she's done just fine. Why the need to denigrate?