Houston is the biggest and rapidly growing market without a team, but I think for this league a major question is whether there is already an established base of women's basketball fans in the area.At least 10 bids!
I’m gonna guess Nashville or Houston.
- Philly
- Cleveland
- Charlotte
- Nashville
- Detroit
- Milwaukee
- St Louis
- KC
- Houston
- Austin
We already have the CT Sun, so there def wouldn't be new team in our small state. If anything, the Sun would move to maybe Boston. Would be unfortunate, but a better market and better amenities most likely for the players.Hartford?
Double up to 24. By adding two teams every couple of years. The WNBA moved a bit too soon on the other expansion teams. Now they are playing what if. Adding Golden State was a smart move. Sorry Portland and Toronto but your cities just don’t compare. With the Caitlyn Clark effect this past season everyone wants a team. Portland had a chance. It didn’t work. Do did Detroit, Cleveland and Charlotte. Go to the bottom of the list. As oldhusky said; Nashville and Austin make the best sense. Adding one team brings us to 16. Keeping building off of that if the numbers continue grow or stabilize.
Could you inform me: is the U of Texas arena seemingly 2nd class because it's a college arena? Or is it not a top-notch facility?The problem with Austin is that they plan to play at the UTexas arena. Seems very 2nd class.
Ultimately a big thing that matters, which we don’t see well, is the quality of the bids — the investors, their experience, their plans. Several of the bids are from NBA teams, which surely helps.
One plus for Charlotte this time is the proximity to SC. Now that WCBB has taken off there, gotta be more built in interest now. And if they get some ex SC players …
Milwaukee and St. Louis are both not big WCBB hubs and have summer competition with MLB. Those seem less attractive.
Because it's a college arena.Could you inform me: is the U of Texas arena seemingly 2nd class because it's a college arena?
11k is fineAustin. Moody is nice. But it only holds just under 11,000 fans for basketball (up to about 15,000 for concerts). 5 years ago that would have been great. With the growth of the game, I think that is too small.
The WNBA is May-Sep, while the NFL is Sep-Feb and the NHL is Oct-Apr. So if there is any overlap it is the beginning of the NFL when the WNBA playoffs are on.Could you inform me: is the U of Texas arena seemingly 2nd class because it's a college arena? Or is it not a top-notch facility?
(I honestly don't know the answer to the second question.)
I read a comment somewhere thinking that Austin would be good because there isn't that much professional competition, save for the men's soccer team, which is a whole different situation.
In the same vein, Nashville also has a men's soccer team, but its two pro teams -- the Titans (NFL) and Predators (NHL) -- are dormant during most of the WNBA season, so the Summit would have that time to themselves (is that subject-verge in agreement?)
Can see Charlotte, for the reasons discussed, plus no real competition during that time.
I wouldn't mind seeing a team in Philly to increase some Atlantic rivalries, plus it's close enough to my northern NJ home, but not sure the team would be a draw in sports-saturated city that does tend to clear out in the summer to various locales. Wonder what former poster, UConnHusky, a Philly native if I recall, would've thought about chances in that city?
Stay tuned.