How haven't I? Because I called a poor defender a defensive liability and criticized an organization that wants to have a defensive identify for selecting players who obviously don't fit said identity?
Saying "huge defensive liability .... and that she's been so for entire WNBA career" over and over and over again does not make it true.
But her showing over and over again that she cannot guard her position and does nothing for the team's defensive identity does make it true. I'm not saying anything that hasn't been attributed to her for her entire career. She is a defensive liability and has been since she stepped foot into the WNBA.
I think that taking in your entire posting history, I see your credibility as inadequate.
You're upset because I am not going to sugarcoat things about a UConn alum (or anyone, for that matter) just for the sake of appeasement. If I was painting a rosy picture about Katie Lou, you wouldn't even engage.
I have been fair and balanced regarding the critiques of Caitlin. She has a long way to go. However, I'm not going to write off her entire future just because she's struggled during her first two games as a pro. She didn't face defensive pressure and speed/athleticism in the B1G like she's facing now. She's going to have to adjust. But I've made it clear that she has not been very good so far. I just refuse to write her off after two pro games.
Katie Lou, on the other hand, is five years older and has faced this level of pressure previously. She is who she is at this point in her career--and it's not enough for this Fever team.