Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Shades, post: 3760918, member: 6101"] 44 pt. She really hasn’t had a bad game so far this season against lesser competition. Tonight’s game against TAMU will be interesting. The new coach wants to play positionless ball or small ball... SF’s are the PF’s. They already have Stokes and maybe Zahui, maybe Han.... and the big from Louisville. I wonder if the Liberty would consider trading #1 for #2 & #5. Plus they were starting Mabrey with decent results. Only if she‘s enthusiastic about playing in the WNBA. She seems to have avoided attending college in America. Internationals who attend American colleges are much more reliable in showing up to the WNBA. Remember all the hype about Vadeeva being a lottery pick? She fell to #11 because nobody could tell if she was enthusiastic about the WNBA. It could be she only told the Sparks she was enthusiastic in the hopes of going there. Conspiracy theory. No no no no no. There should be something better at #9. Hope for Mack or Kuier to fall or find a gem of a guard like Gondrezick or Kiana Williams. Boley strikes me as a KML type of player, not a post like Shepard. No offense, but I don’t want that type of player. She’s welcome to prove me wrong though (on a different team). Mabrey has proved me wrong so far. I know who does those picks for that site and they’re pretty helpless without input from Rebkell.The Boley pick must have been their attempt at independence.;) [/QUOTE]