cuse got lucky about a rebound. but wisconsin was not lucky making 9-11 threes to start the second half. i guess it's easy to cherry pick one play or another and call it "lucky".Posted in another thread.
Cuse got lucky that Wiscy kid couldn't catch the airball cleanly. No one on him and an easy two if he catches that. Need some luck though in the NCAAT.
cuse got lucky about a rebound. but wisconsin was not lucky making 9-11 threes to start the second half. i guess it's easy to cherry pick one play or another and call it "lucky".
First, someone is overly sensitive. What are you 15. Luck is something that allows teams to win in the NCAAT as mentioned. Also, your team won, WTF are you doing over here?
Second, it's not cherry picking when you are discussing the final sequence of the game. If Wiscy had made that last shot or last 3, they would have been lucky because those were bad, off-balance threes.
Third, the ball squeezing out of the rebounders hands is extremely bad luck. Making or missing shots is more skill than luck, unless you want to say every jump shot made by either team was "luck". Wiscy had fairly decent looks and shots throughout the game. They didn't make many off balance "lucky" shots.
Fourth, you are shooting off at the wrong person. I am one of the few over here who actually likes the Cuse team. Though because of jerkwads like you I am starting to abhor most of your fanbase.
The last play? Howabout the last 4 minutes, where Wisconsin would dribble the ball around for 32 seconds then send up a heave, then get the offensive rebound, burn 35 more seconds, and send up another horrible shot. It seemed like they had possession for 3 straight minutes, and they just could not pass the ball inside the 3 point arc.
Wisconsin did a better job killing the clock for us (Cuse) than we did. They literally would slow down a fast break to set up for a 3 pt shot. It was the most exiciting, boring game I ever watched.