Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="MarkyMark, post: 4657300, member: 12210"] Thanks for posting this Huskymedic. My view is the so-called "experts" are going to be more constructive on Uconn than the actual selection committee. I base that primarily upon last year's record, accomplishments, and seeding. That's why I don't pay much attention to these guys in addition to hosting discussions last month (I echo dbmill's comments on this matter). Can the committee view Uconn in a more favorable light this year? Yes, I believe that's possible based primarily on last year's tourney success (goodwill). However, I still think the so-called experts are, almost in every case, overseeding and over ranking Uconn compared to my expectations for the committee. Not trying to be a buzzkill but looking at it honestly. If Uconn does not win this tournament I still need to need the committee to show me the BE can be a 2-bid conference in the current environment. [/QUOTE]