To say Sedona is better than Paige "to create and finish in the midrange" is a joke. Why don't you write a letter to ESPN and NBAdraftroom arguing why Sedona not in their list? No need to defense her in here.
Sedona is very good player but not performing at a NPOY or NDPOY level now. Saying is very cheap and I can say this also. Your opinions are only represented by You. No need to deny other's opinions?
What Prince has done to change the program? Is she involving in the coaching stuffs? Prince helps and promoting the TCU program by scoring more points. But changing the TCU program? Please tell us how?
And Sedona is 24.5 years old, born My 20, 2000. In USA if you are 24.5 years old we call it 25 years old.
I was referring to Prince having a better midrange than the other 6-7 players listed above, not Paige. I’m fully in the camp that Bueckers is a better player and prospect and is the clear cut number 1 pick.
Prince is averaging 20/11 and 4 blocks on 64% shooting for an undefeated top 10 team with her best showings coming against ranked foes, scoring 30+ and putting up 20/20 in upset wins. In your opinion what else is needed to qualify as playing at a “NPOY level?” Have you watched her play this year?
Paige and a few others are also performing at a NPOY level. Voelpel mentioned Prince as a POY candidate yesterday, so I’m not alone in this thought process.
In regards to changing the program, a few weeks into the season TCU has gone from unranked to its highest ranking in program history. Prince is the team’s best player on either end. If TCU can sustain themselves as a strong program, she deserves credit for being a catalyst to putting TCU women’s basketball on the map when previously they’ve been an afterthought.
And I’ve lived in the USA my whole life. I have never heard of people rounding their age at the half year mark, but you do you.