Why were we doubling in the post? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Why were we doubling in the post?

Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,675
Reaction Score
7,551
My thoughts on the doubling strategy:
  • Instead of doubling, I would have rather seen Sanogo at the 4 and Clingan at the 5. It's not great for spacing on the offensive end, but a few mins would have been interesting to give Karaban a breather.
This tactic has really worked well in several recent UConn games. Most teams don’t have answer for it, and Sanogo can continue polishing his 3 pt shooting (Lol) and even if he misses, Clingan likely gets the rebound. The defense on Hawkins, Newton and Karaban or Joey C falls apart.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
2,276
Reaction Score
2,943
Yeah, we really, really needed Johnson in this game. Should have given Springs some minutes, his post D is probably better than Alex's. Karaban was playing post defense against a big, physical guy. The kind of pushing shoving, holding ground D we ask Sanogo to do. That is not his strong suit to begin with, and defending that way is going to consume a lot of energy, so playing 37 minutes is too much. He was a problem on the defensive end against Oklahoma State. Guards coming on the double helped a few times and produced good results.
Guards coming on the double resulted in ball rotation and dunks just as often.

Asking Karaban to play post defense against a talented, physical 4 is not the way to go, but we basically didn't try anything else, which is disappointing.
 

Online statistics

Members online
383
Guests online
2,682
Total visitors
3,065

Forum statistics

Threads
159,820
Messages
4,206,781
Members
10,076
Latest member
Mpjd2024


.
Top Bottom