Then people wonder why coaches cheat? They would have to be stupid not to bend the rules in order to feed their families.
If a kid commits verbally, he should have to sign a letter within two weeks. And this letter should bind the player to that coach and school for a year or they don't play college ball for a year. This would eliminate a lot of the intrigue and corruption in the recruiting business.
My problem with this is simple. The UConn basketball program wants the state to spend 150 mil for a new civic center for its team.The benefit of a LOI is almost entirely with the school, with severe potentialT negatives for the kid. We hashed this out repeatedly with Daniel Hamilton (surely you remember these discussions) and why he was waiting so long.
There is provision now for that case and no reason to not continue itThe average coach of a team in the NCAA tournament makes a salary of around $1.5M/year. That's exclusive of bonuses, incentives, payments from apparel companies, etc. So your "feed their families" point is silly.
More importantly, you want to force the 18 year old to pledge a year of his life to a coach who can - and often does - bounce to a new school before the kid sets foot on campus. In what universe does that strike you as fair?
You asked why a kid would wait. The answer is obvious: it's not in their best interest.
There really isn't anything else to discuss.
Because it provides at least some buffer between a car salesman of a coach refusing to take no for an answer and a 17-year old kid and his family.
Because it provides at least some buffer between a car salesman of a coach refusing to take no for an answer and a 17-year old kid and his family.
These same kids have never seen a contract in their life. They haven't purchased a car, house (of course) or other binding agreement. A coach makes an enticing and convincing pitch, the kid's mind is blown and he says yes (I would bet emotionally). Do you really expect that kid to sign right then and there? Or better question do you really expect their parent to allow that kid to sign right away? They are not picking a sport to dribble and shoot, but a college to grow, mature and get an education. Of course it may not result in that but nonetheless its part of the decision.If a kid commits verbally, he should have to sign a letter within two weeks. And this letter should bind the player to that coach and school for a year or they don't play college ball for a year.
We have also "encouraged" committed kids to "look around". Translation, we think we just spotted a better kid at your position so run along. I believe the kid I'm thinking of was named Will Harris and he ended up at UVA.I always wondered this about recruiting as well. Essentially a verbal commit means nothing because the kid can change his mind at any time until he signs the LOI. We have been left at the alter in recent years as far as this goes with Harkless, Melvin, Jackson, Ali, and to some extent Bynum if you want to include him. If I were a coach, I wouldnt feel 100% comfortable about a recruit until he officially signs.