cockhrnleghrn
Crowing rooster
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Messages
- 4,466
- Reaction Score
- 8,410
Even if the Gamecocks lose at Gampel in February, there is still a little thing left called the NCAAT in March and April.February 9th can't come soon enough
Even if the Gamecocks lose at Gampel in February, there is still a little thing left called the NCAAT in March and April.February 9th can't come soon enough
Listen, as impressive as that sounds, we've got SMU, Tulane, Tulsa, and Houston to worry about. But I don't wanna brag or anything.Say USC comes into it's game vs UConn undefeated...
That would mean that USC would first have to beat a top-10 ranked Duke - Duke is not in the top-10 now with 3 losses, but they lost all three to ranked opponents in consecutive games with their top player either missing the games to injury or just coming back from that injury - a top-10 ranked Kentucky (who still has to play @ Duke before us), and a top-5 ranked Texas A&M (who will play Texas for their next big game, and also plays UT before us). Also USC will have to beat ranked UGA, who is undefeated and quickly moving up the rankings but will run a gauntlet of TAMU, @ UT, @ UK, and then hosting USC in successive games(!!!). Four days after the UGA game, USC faces UConn...
IF USC gets through all those unscathed, but even struggles through them, will there still be posters here saying that finally UConn gets to show USC who is rightfully the #1 team?
Say USC comes into it's game vs UConn undefeated...
That would mean that USC would first have to beat a top-10 ranked Duke - Duke is not in the top-10 now with 3 losses, but they lost all three to ranked opponents in consecutive games with their top player either missing the games to injury or just coming back from that injury - a top-10 ranked Kentucky (who still has to play @ Duke before us), and a top-5 ranked Texas A&M (who will play Texas for their next big game, and also plays UT before us). Also USC will have to beat ranked UGA, who is undefeated and quickly moving up the rankings but will run a gauntlet of TAMU, @ UT, @ UK, and then hosting USC in successive games(!!!). Four days after the UGA game, USC faces UConn...
IF USC gets through all those unscathed, but even struggles through them, will there still be posters here saying that finally UConn gets to show USC who is rightfully the #1 team?
Silly to bring in the Football world. The "committee" is paid to meet, discuss and evaluate - something they do all week..
You mean we're not getting paid here?
GOOD GOD STOP !!!! YOU ARE NUMBER ONE !!!! For now, simply enjoy it, take it for what it is worth. Share it with friends on your board. The number one paranoia will destroy ya.Say USC comes into it's game vs UConn undefeated...
That would mean that USC would first have to beat a top-10 ranked Duke - Duke is not in the top-10 now with 3 losses, but they lost all three to ranked opponents in consecutive games with their top player either missing the games to injury or just coming back from that injury - a top-10 ranked Kentucky (who still has to play @ Duke before us), and a top-5 ranked Texas A&M (who will play Texas for their next big game, and also plays UT before us). Also USC will have to beat ranked UGA, who is undefeated and quickly moving up the rankings but will run a gauntlet of TAMU, @ UT, @ UK, and then hosting USC in successive games(!!!). Four days after the UGA game, USC faces UConn...
IF USC gets through all those unscathed, but even struggles through them, will there still be posters here saying that finally UConn gets to show USC who is rightfully the #1 team?
Nope, we aren't one of the power five yet.You mean we're not getting paid here?
That may be true but is there anyone who thinks they are the number one team in the country or for that matter, is it possible that there aren't a number of teams in the country that play a better brand of ball then that team. That was one of the worst performances of basketball that I've seen in a very long time. I'm not talking about the athleticism but the actual "skill" of basketball which is to score points while preventing the other team from doing so. I've heard comments about their defensive prowess but I think it had a lot more to do with Duke's ineptness than any defensive excellence. When has there been a more embarrassing number one team???? Shameful!SC could very well come to Gampel on 2/9 undefeated. This would be good
for WBB.
Accomplishments???? They won all their games though they played less than stellar teams and actually won their last game against a team who was horribly overranked and played quite poorly and yet still had a four point lead until they shot themselves in the foot and basically threw the game away. Basically, you would expect a team to EARN the number one ranking by playing examplary ball and as of yet, I don't think there's a lot of people who feel they've ACCOMPLISHED that. In theory, the number one team should be a team that is exceptional and performing at an extraordinary level. Are you suggesting that South Carolina quite fits that description????The number 1 ranking shouldn't matter at all for UCONN fans. You have 9 titles!!! Let someone else enjoy a moment in the sun without belittling their accomplishments.
Did you really forget UConn scoring just 12 points in a half 4 seasons ago? A team that had both Maya Moore and Tina Charles on it, mind you. I think that qualifies as more embarrassing than anything South Carolina did on Sunday.That may be true but is there anyone who thinks they are the number one team in the country or for that matter, is it possible that there aren't a number of teams in the country that play a better brand of ball then that team. That was one of the worst performances of basketball that I've seen in a very long time. I'm not talking about the athleticism but the actual "skill" of basketball which is to score points while preventing the other team from doing so. I've heard comments about their defensive prowess but I think it had a lot more to do with Duke's ineptness than any defensive excellence. When has there been a more embarrassing number one team???? Shameful!
And like USC, Uconn found a way to win. I look forward to the game in February.Did you really forget UConn scoring just 12 points in a half 4 seasons ago? A team that had both Maya Moore and Tina Charles on it, mind you. I think that qualifies as more embarrassing than anything South Carolina did on Sunday.
I originally thought we were on piece work. Last spring I found out we weren't.You mean we're not getting paid here?
I disagree that the polls are irrelevant. It's true they have no impact on the champion that is eventually crowned but they confer an air of legitimacy to teams throughout the year. Right now South Carolina is likely enjoying unearned respect simply because voters tend to knock down teams after losses and boost teams with fewer losses over teams with greater losses. "So what?" you ask. I've already conceded the polls don't crown champions. Recruits are looking at polls though. Perception does affect decisions. Voters SHOULD approach each week's placement the same way they do the preseason poll. Who are best 25 teams and in what order. Instead, the model seems to be whom did I vote for last week and move teams who didn't lose over teams that did. Their only decision appears to be Team A lost, how far should they be demoted.I say this respectfully and recognize you are just giving an opinion -- But I could truly care less.
As others said, it is great for the sport of WCBB. Whether we are 1,2 or 10 is so irrelevant. When we beat them silly at Gampel, all this will work itself out.
In Tiger Woods' heyday, the betting for a major tournament used to be "Tiger vs the field." By the time the FF comes around, the betting will be UConn vs the field.
Texas is undefeated. Should they be ranked above us? Texas A&M, North Carolina, Oregon State, Georgia, and Mississippi State are also unbeaten. Should UConn be ranked #8? And that's just unbeaten top 25 teams. Do we even belong in the top ten?Winning matters, it isn't about style points, who looks the best or whom everyone thinks is the best. On-court results are what should matter. SC is undefeated and until someone beats them they are and should remain #1. Where does this culture if equivocation stem from? In sports winning is what matters, first, last and always!! UConn will get the opportunity to prove who is better on Feb. 9th, after that game, they'll be no doubt about who is #1.
Is that a serious question?Say USC comes into it's game vs UConn undefeated...
That would mean that USC would first have to beat a top-10 ranked Duke - Duke is not in the top-10 now with 3 losses, but they lost all three to ranked opponents in consecutive games with their top player either missing the games to injury or just coming back from that injury - a top-10 ranked Kentucky (who still has to play @ Duke before us), and a top-5 ranked Texas A&M (who will play Texas for their next big game, and also plays UT before us). Also USC will have to beat ranked UGA, who is undefeated and quickly moving up the rankings but will run a gauntlet of TAMU, @ UT, @ UK, and then hosting USC in successive games(!!!). Four days after the UGA game, USC faces UConn...
IF USC gets through all those unscathed, but even struggles through them, will there still be posters here saying that finally UConn gets to show USC who is rightfully the #1 team?
Why should we tout the living conditions in fools' paradises?The number 1 ranking shouldn't matter at all for UCONN fans. You have 9 titles!!! Let someone else enjoy a moment in the sun without belittling their accomplishments.