I think part of the conservatism comes from having a QB that can't throw.
He is conservative because he doesn't have the talent to open up the offense.
He is conservative because he doesn't have the talent to open up the offense.
Honestly, his style of coaching doesnt fit the B12 offensively
He is conservative because he doesn't have the talent to open up the offense.
UConn might not be loaded with ESPN Top 300 talent, but they have enough talent in their skill positions to at least get by with a halfway ambitious offense.
We're actually loaded with kids who should be 4-stars but the recruiting services are BIASED AGAINST US YOU GUYZthat's a load of crap. We don't even know who's talented because we don't give anyone a chance to make plays
Agree. He is extremely risk avoidant. I was thinking about why he is this way and the only answer I could come up with is he is developing a long term strategy that keeps all games close, within striking distance. He believes that this is the best shot at winning. That is why he is emphasizing closing at the end of games so much. With him it's all about, old fashioned smash mouth, defensive oriented, ball control, clock chewing football - the antithesis of up tempo run and shoot. I don't think you will see Diaco at Foxwoods at the crap table any day soon. Crazy thing is this team will win more this year and probably go to a bowl game. This team will not win many style points. They win ugly and are blue collar all the way. Where the lack of confidence comes into play is he doesn't seem to feel we can win against, Houston, Cincy, VA, BC, USF, etc without controlling the tempo of the game with a run oriented approach. The team seems to have bought into this philosophy.
And the fact that I saw last night was that most of the AAC teams looked a lot better than UConn does.What a difference between us plodders and the rebuilding SMU team against North Texas last night. SMU attacked with a fast paced offense.
Plodding is ok if you consistently win. Plodding is college football death if you struggle.
Interesting perspective, and likely the correct one. Here's the thing, he does take some shots, there aren't all that many though. I wonder what people would be saying about him if those dropped passes, or passes thrown behind the receiver connected?I've seen enough to come to the conclusion that he is coaching exactly how he wants to coach. He's picked all his assistants from a pool he is fami with, he hasn't taken over the offensive play calling 'cause he doesn't like it, he's a 2 time Big10 defensive 1st team player so he knows what it takes to get stops, he works from 4:30am to 10:30pm during fall camp - unless he is a complete idiot he sees what is going on. His team will do the basics better than anyone else and that will keep the game close 'til the 4th qtr. where superior execution of the basics and superior physical stamina will win most games. It's a bonus if other team is reckless and gives UConn a chance to jump on them early but UConn will grind it out from the 1st play.
There are plenty of MAC teams and Sun Belt teams with less talent that find a way to open up the offense. UConn doesn't open up the offense because BD doesn't want to. BD doesn't coach scared but he definitely is afraid of turnovers.
So your saying if we get into the B12 we'll develop a more consistent passing game, not to mention a more exciting offense?Gary Patterson at TCU has a ground and pound offense when they were invited into the Big XII. Look at them now. A few years of Big XII recruiting helped
He is conservative because he doesn't have the talent to open up the offense.
And he won't . . . ever . . . with that approach. Kids with play making skills coming out of high school aren't gonna want to come to UConn to be part of a unit (the offense) that functions primarily to give the defense a break on the sideline.
Wouldn't be shocked to see receivers transfer out either considering we only throw to 1 or 2 per game.
Okay, I was pretty critical of Thursday's performance but I think this is too much after one game.