I thought the last two drives were coached pretty well, no? That must be done throughout the game.It's not arguable that he does. The question is why?
I really want to see the guy succeed. But Geez Louise. I think his teams might perform a little better, if he showed more confidence in them.
It's not arguable that he does. The question is why?
I really want to see the guy succeed. But Geez Louise. I think his teams might perform a little better, if he showed more confidence in them.
This is the same guy who, last year, went on the road to an SEC team and was faking every damn kick. Flea-flickers. With a team that had just come off 2-10 and had no reasonable right to think they'd be in the game.
Now that they improved to mediocre, he's coaching terrified. I don't get it.
This is the same guy who, last year, went on the road to an SEC team and was faking every damn kick. Flea-flickers. With a team that had just come off 2-10 and had no reasonable right to think they'd be in the game.
Now that they improved to mediocre, he's coaching terrified. I don't get it.
Really nailed this.I've seen enough to come to the conclusion that he is coaching exactly how he wants to coach. He's picked all his assistants from a pool he is fami with, he hasn't taken over the offensive play calling 'cause he doesn't like it, he's a 2 time Big10 defensive 1st team player so he knows what it takes to get stops, he works from 4:30am to 10:30pm during fall camp - unless he is a complete idiot he sees what is going on. His team will do the basics better than anyone else and that will keep the game close 'til the 4th qtr. where superior execution of the basics and superior physical stamina will win most games. It's a bonus if other team is reckless and gives UConn a chance to jump on them early but UConn will grind it out from the 1st play.
If you are trying to gain fan interest then run, run, run, and punt isn't going to pull in any casual fans. He really isn't a very good game day coach. I support him as a fan, but am nervous about our direction.Diaco is very metrics driven. He quantifies and measures factors correlated with success. He has said as much many times. So, if a negative turnover ratio is highly correlated with losing, he is obsessively focused on no turnovers. That was one of his first goals coming in. The strength program works the same way. Measure, measure. He recruits the same way. Body frame matters. But, there is more to the game than that and he is turning these kids into little zombies in a box with no latitude to make plays because he won't take the risk. They are very short leashes. He is arriving in the same suffocating place as PP GDL just from a different angle. The only time anything was opened up was when TJ took over a sinking ship.
You nailed it. Dude is a kook. We want so much to believe after the Pasqualoni nightmare he gets the benefit of the doubt. This team is pretty damn good despite of, not because of, pretty boy BobI just think he's a really odd dude. He goes to Missouri and fakes 15 field goals, and plays FCS teams to tie. Fish cakes, batman, vampires? I think he had a few concussions at Iowa
Watched the replay and saw this nugget.
The Arkeel TD late had something interesting take place. The 2 plays before the TD and the TD:
Play 1
Did anyone notice that Peart was moved to TE on the right side while they over loaded the left side? They then ran it towards Peart for minimal gain.
Play 2
Pass int gives us 1st and goal.
Play 3
Knappe was moved to the left TE spot, again overloaded on the left and Arkeel runs that way for TD
That will cause future opens to pause.
If he tries a FB dive on the goal line, that's when we'll confirm that his playcalling philosophy comes straight out of playing Madden 06. Loading the TE to the side of the run was easy money.
I used to play tennis quite a bit, with varying levels of success. When I was at my worst, I would try to be a big hitting, baseline playing Andre Agassi. The problem was I did not have the precision to avoid making tons of unforced errors. It felt good to swing hard, and every once in a while I could groove some winners that looked good and impressed my opponents. I got tired of losing though, so I changed my game. Less baseline play, more easy to execute, high probability swings. I was a lot more successful in terms of W-L.
I would love to some day be able to consistently hit winners on the baseline. But I also prefer winning matches. Sometimes you have to choose between two competing interests.
I'm thinking that Diaco and his staff have determined based on what they have seen in practice, that they are not yet ready to win on the baseline. What IS inexcusable to me is the clock management, and the seemingly irrational risk-taking when they deviate.
Watched the replay and saw this nugget.
The Arkeel TD late had something interesting take place. The 2 plays before the TD and the TD:
Play 1
Did anyone notice that Peart was moved to TE on the right side while they over loaded the left side? They then ran it towards Peart for minimal gain.
Play 2
Pass int gives us 1st and goal.
Play 3
Knappe was moved to the left TE spot, again overloaded on the left and Arkeel runs that way for TD
That will cause future opens to pause.
But is that the QB type he is comfortable with? You also can't write-off the bizarre clock management to conservatism. The whole process of calling a play, getting it in to the huddle and the getting it off before zero time is too often a needless drama.I think part of the conservatism comes from having a QB that can't throw.