Why didn't Benedict self impose this year? | The Boneyard

Why didn't Benedict self impose this year?

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,518
Reaction Score
7,139
He knew what the NCAA allegations were, that KO was involved and that the season was lost anyway.

Horrible job.
 
Who’s to say that whatever we did is worthy of a ban? Could just be loss of scholarships and probation
 
He knew what the NCAA allegations were, that KO was involved and that the season was lost anyway.

Horrible job.

Lol.....self-imposing during a season where you won’t even be eligible.

No one is that stupid.
 
Think we may need to separate the NCAA stuff and the firing for just cause into two very distinct buckets
 
maybe the just cause ain't so black and white, maybe it's nothing about violations
 
Think we may need to separate the NCAA stuff and the firing for just cause into two very distinct buckets
C'mon, knowledgeable Boneyard posters absolutely and inexplicably believe just cause must be looking the other way while a few guys practiced a little too much.
 
He could have done it after the Oregon game and might have been taken seriously but any time after that would have been insane. The Arkansas pummeling basically killed that option and after that uconn would have been laughed off.
 
He could have done it after the Oregon game and might have been taken seriously but any time after that would have been insane. The Arkansas pummeling basically killed that option and after that uconn would have been laughed off.
And if he had people would called for his head saying that killed the season. Just saying.
 
I'm a bit concerned because Ollie's contract outlines that to be fired for cause as it relates to the NCAA, the violations have to be "significant or repetitive." As to the significance, either this is bad, or the University doesn't have much ground to stand on. Hopefully its for repeating some minor violation.

Or that an employee/coach under his watch committed a NCAA violation and Ollie knew but didn't report or correct. The most convenient out would be Chillous somehow being tied into this FBI investigation, Ollie knowing, and hiring him anyway.
 
I'm a bit concerned because Ollie's contract outlines that to be fired for cause as it relates to the NCAA, the violations have to be "significant or repetitive." As to the significance, either this is bad, or the University doesn't have much ground to stand on. Hopefully its for repeating some minor violation.

Or that an employee/coach under his watch committed a NCAA violation and Ollie knew but didn't report or correct.


Significant would be the head coach being named responsible for level 1 or 2 infractions where he would face a suspension.
 
If they self-impose, it'll def be next year - which is going to be a mess anyway.

Get the new coach in, get what commitments you can - move on. You don't waste a self-imposed on a year that's already lost and a lame duck coach.
 
Isn’t the new buzz that it was unsanctioned workouts? That stuff is typically a few Game vacation for the coach not a post season ban.
I read that also. WTH? JA and Larrier. That is absolutely ridiculous.
 

Online statistics

Members online
215
Guests online
2,577
Total visitors
2,792

Forum statistics

Threads
164,113
Messages
4,382,618
Members
10,185
Latest member
aacgoast


.
..
Top Bottom