http://www.inc.com/david-evans/5-rules-for-making-cash-a-figurehead-king.htmlPretty much any model that maximizes profit would maximize attendance.
If you've dealt with EASYSEAT at all... you would never assume they could even define algorithm, nevermind develop an effective one.
You're not wrong. But I don't think too many people outside of this conference are going to notice there's 4k or however many empty seats. Does anyone on the east coast comment on the MWC or Horizon League having empty seats? Not really. If having a sellout was important to the league, they'd lower prices. It's not, so they didn't.
http://www.inc.com/david-evans/5-rules-for-making-cash-a-figurehead-king.html
Have you thought about contacting the CEO directly or a Courant contact?
After UConn fans ran up the resale ticket prices for the NCAA Regional @ the Garden last year, I'm not sure why are people area suprised that those in the ticket selling business wouldn't try to maximize profits? They have no fan allegiance (UConn or otherwise).
Makes me have to ask this question: is the American Pilgrim Conference responsible for the cheap easy seat tickets that were sold? Thinking they put those up there to sell a bunch of tickets off the bat.
You don't find it annoying 4k people missed out on the experience today because the American Athletic Conference is rigging the ticket market?
Annoyed - maybe, surprised - no.
No allegiances other than to dead presidents. (applies to conference, re-sellers and venue).
And you think it's in the conference's best financial interest to leave 10k seats empty for two UConn games? Maybe you are missing my point? I can respect an allegiance to money - if they could actually execute on that.
I'm not missing your point @ all. I was only asking why anyone would be suprised. As strange as it sounds - I'm just not sure selling out was high on their list (I get it's counter intuitive).
Here is latest comment from Aresco:
"I'd say we're satisfied with attendance," Aresco said, just before the start of the UConn-Tulsa semfinal game on Saturday, when it looked as if about 12,000 were in the stands. "We knew if UConn advanced, it would be good. … We calibrated [prices] very carefully. We priced them lower than last year at Memphis, and much lower than at the Garden for the old Big East and the ACC tournament. There will always be people who say it's too expensive, but we'll certainly examine it every year."
http://www.courant.com/sports/uconn...nn-tickets-0315-20150314-story.html?track=rss
It's more that I understand they can't maximize their revenue when they don't sell a quarter of their inventory today.
UConn has played 3 games. Those three games were played to 18k empty seats.
They can claim they calibrated ticket prices carefully. That doesn't mean they did it well.
Mike Aresco says all sorts of ridiculous things about this conference. Spoiler alert: they aren't always true. If he's really satisfied with the attendance he should be removed from the position at halftime tomorrow and replaced with HFD.
You want to wait till halftime tomorrow?
Annoyed - maybe, surprised - no.
No allegiances other than to dead presidents. (applies to conference, re-sellers and venue).
Pretty much any model that maximizes profit would maximize attendance.
I expect the tourney next year in Florida will have tops a max. of 4-5,000 for any game. UCF and USF aren't sending fans to watch a blowout. The fact that they could have built some momentum for this conference in last two years yet failed to see that is the big problem here. They needed to make some of the seats, (especially early rounds) extremely affordable for the casual fan base. Get them hooked, get the seats filled.